Skip to content

[UR] Skip new command-buffer CTS test on L0 V2 #17566

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2025

Conversation

EwanC
Copy link
Contributor

@EwanC EwanC commented Mar 21, 2025

All UR command-buffer CTS tests are marked as XFail on V2 See CTS generic base class for command-buffer

This was omitted by accident from the new command-buffer CTS tests added in #17494 which don't derive from that base class. Fixed by adding in now.

All UR command-buffer CTS tests are marked as XFail on V2 [See CTS
generic base class for command-buffer](https://github.com/intel/llvm/blob/sycl/unified-runtime/test/conformance/exp_command_buffer/fixtures.h#L48)

This was omitted by accident from the new command-buffer CTS
tests added in intel#17494 which don't
derive from that base class. Fixed by adding in now.
@EwanC EwanC temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock March 21, 2025 12:12 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@EwanC EwanC marked this pull request as ready for review March 21, 2025 12:19
@EwanC EwanC requested a review from a team as a code owner March 21, 2025 12:19
@EwanC EwanC requested a review from fabiomestre March 21, 2025 12:19
@EwanC EwanC temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock March 21, 2025 12:22 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@EwanC EwanC temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock March 21, 2025 12:22 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@EwanC
Copy link
Contributor Author

EwanC commented Mar 21, 2025

@intel/llvm-gatekeepers This is good to merge, thanks

@uditagarwal97 uditagarwal97 merged commit 6d25c1e into intel:sycl Mar 21, 2025
31 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants