Skip to content

[Driver][SYCL] Improve handling of linker inputs for static lib proce… #1851

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 12, 2020

Conversation

mdtoguchi
Copy link
Contributor

…ssing

When processing the command line for static archives, we go through the
direct to linker values (-Wl, -Xlinker) to find any additional libraries
and objects that should be included. The trigger options for that scanning
was too broad, allowing too many options (including options with separate
arguments) to be incorrectly processed as objects and/or libraries.

Signed-off-by: Michael D Toguchi [email protected]

@mdtoguchi mdtoguchi requested a review from AGindinson as a code owner June 9, 2020 22:18
Copy link
Contributor

@AGindinson AGindinson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code looks good -- personally, I couldn't just figure out some LIT intricacies

…ssing

When processing the command line for static archives, we go through the
direct to linker values (-Wl, -Xlinker) to find any additional libraries
and objects that should be included.  The trigger options for that scanning
was too broad, allowing too many options (including options with separate
arguments) to be incorrectly processed as objects and/or libraries.

Signed-off-by: Michael D Toguchi <[email protected]>
@mdtoguchi mdtoguchi force-pushed the private/mdtoguchi/partial-link-obj-fix branch from c37f37f to 069879e Compare June 11, 2020 17:28
@bader bader merged commit ed2846f into intel:sycl Jun 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants