Skip to content

Enhance Itanium demangler interface. #1880

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2020
Merged

Conversation

kbobrovs
Copy link
Contributor

Add new APIs needed to use the demangler for C++ demangling in IR passes.
This is a prerequisite for the upcoming ESIMD LLVM passes.

Signed-off-by: Konstantin S Bobrovsky [email protected]

Copy link
Contributor

@bader bader left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suggest committing this directly to llorg repo instead.
It will be pulled into sycl branch from there.
If it's needed in sycl branch urgently, we can cherry-pick it.

@kbobrovs
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK, will do. Reduced the patch to the minimum required.

Add new APIs needed to use the demangler for C++ demangling in IR passes.

Signed-off-by: Konstantin S Bobrovsky <[email protected]>
@kbobrovs
Copy link
Contributor Author

Phabricator:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D81905

@bader
Copy link
Contributor

bader commented Jun 16, 2020

Thanks.
Let's hope it will be accepted w/o regression tests and usages inside the project code base.

Please, fix buildbot/sycl-win-x64-pr failure.

@kbobrovs
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please, fix buildbot/sycl-win-x64-pr failure.

The failure is not related to this patch. Just rebuilt, and this time it went fine.

@kbobrovs kbobrovs requested a review from bader June 16, 2020 21:13
@bader bader merged commit db74d92 into intel:sycl Jun 17, 2020
@kbobrovs kbobrovs deleted the esimd-itanium branch July 30, 2020 12:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants