Skip to content

[SYCL] Implement SYCL_INTEL_device_specific_kernel_queries #2549

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 29, 2020

Conversation

alexbatashev
Copy link
Contributor

Also adjust subgroups implementation

Alexander Batashev added 2 commits September 28, 2020 16:33
@alexbatashev alexbatashev requested a review from a team as a code owner September 28, 2020 13:35
Comment on lines -4164 to -4166
_ZN2cl4sycl6detail11stream_impl15accessGlobalBufERNS0_7handlerE
_ZN2cl4sycl6detail11stream_impl20accessGlobalFlushBufERNS0_7handlerE
_ZN2cl4sycl6detail11stream_impl18accessGlobalOffsetERNS0_7handlerE
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This isn't a breaking change, these lines had been reordered.

sergey-semenov
sergey-semenov previously approved these changes Sep 29, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@sergey-semenov sergey-semenov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@bader bader merged commit 24ae95b into intel:sycl Sep 29, 2020
@alexbatashev alexbatashev deleted the kernel_device_specific_queries branch October 5, 2020 07:55
kbenzie pushed a commit to kbenzie/intel-llvm that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2025
…switch

Move urMemImageGetInfo success test from a switch to individual test
Chenyang-L pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2025
Move urMemImageGetInfo success test from a switch to individual test
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants