Skip to content

[SYCL] Add ITT annotations for SPIR functions as well #3377

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 22, 2021

Conversation

MrSidims
Copy link
Contributor

Previously if was done one for SPIR kernels

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Sidorov [email protected]

Previously if was done one for SPIR kernels

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Sidorov <[email protected]>
@MrSidims
Copy link
Contributor Author

MrSidims commented Mar 18, 2021

  • Add a test

@MrSidims MrSidims requested a review from vzakhari March 18, 2021 21:15
vzakhari
vzakhari previously approved these changes Mar 18, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@vzakhari vzakhari left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Sidorov <[email protected]>
@MrSidims MrSidims marked this pull request as ready for review March 19, 2021 12:04
@MrSidims MrSidims requested a review from bader March 19, 2021 12:04
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Sidorov <[email protected]>
bader
bader previously approved these changes Mar 19, 2021
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Sidorov <[email protected]>
@bader
Copy link
Contributor

bader commented Mar 22, 2021

@MrSidims, please, take a look at pre-commit failures.

@MrSidims
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MrSidims, please, take a look at pre-commit failures.

Taking a look

@MrSidims
Copy link
Contributor Author

MrSidims commented Mar 22, 2021

@bader I have restarted precommit to see if its sporadic (or at least pressed the button). TBH I have no clue, how this patch could affect the failure: under gdb compilation of the test never passes through "SPIRITTAnnotationsPass::run" function. Also local execution of the test results in an assertion `(BT->getBitWidth() == 64 || (ConstValue >> BT->getBitWidth()) == 0) && "Size of externally provided specialization constant value doesn't" "fit into the specialization constant type"' with a compiler build of 20th of March.

@bader bader merged commit e0455ee into intel:sycl Mar 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants