-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 790
[SYCL] Implement SYCL2020 reductions with set initialize_to_identity … #3410
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
v-klochkov
merged 6 commits into
intel:sycl
from
v-klochkov:public_vklochkov_reduction_2020_discard_write
Mar 31, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8d3af03
[SYCL] Implement SYCL2020 reductions with set initialize_to_identity …
v-klochkov c286071
NFC - removed guarding macro around Redu.associateWithHandler
v-klochkov 9f03944
Merge remote-tracking branch 'intel_llvm/sycl' into public_vklochkov_…
v-klochkov 415d955
NFC - Minor clean up inspired by code-reviewer's comments/questions
v-klochkov 64e2818
Merge remote-tracking branch 'intel_llvm/sycl' into public_vklochkov_…
v-klochkov 7b1446d
Merge remote-tracking branch 'intel_llvm/sycl' into public_vklochkov_…
v-klochkov File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems changing
DataLessPropKindSize
can be an ABI break since it can changeMDataLessProps
.But, it looks like the minimum value already allocated for
MDataLessProps
is 4 bytes, so that should be OK.Can we define something like
DataLessPropKindMax = 32
with comment "exceeding this is an ABI break" and use it as the size ofMDataLessProps
? Could you please do it as a separate PR?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, sure, I'll do that in a separate PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Created that PR here: #3458