Skip to content

[SYCL][Doc] Remove masked_sub_group from proposal #8308

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2023

Conversation

Pennycook
Copy link
Contributor

During implementation, it became clear that the differences between the behaviors of masked_sub_group and other SYCL groups would require developers to special-case too many functions. This is at odds with the goal to support a generic group interface.

The functionality originally provided by masked_sub_group will be provided via a different mechanism.

Signed-off-by: John Pennycook [email protected]

@Pennycook Pennycook added the spec extension All issues/PRs related to extensions specifications label Feb 10, 2023
@Pennycook Pennycook requested a review from a team as a code owner February 10, 2023 18:00
During implementation, it became clear that the differences between
the behaviors of masked_sub_group and other SYCL groups would require
developers to special-case too many functions. This is at odds with
the goal to support a generic group interface.

The functionality originally provided by masked_sub_group will be
provided via a different mechanism.

Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <[email protected]>
@bader bader merged commit a5d62c8 into intel:sycl Feb 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
spec extension All issues/PRs related to extensions specifications
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants