Skip to content

Include pending bytes in response message #205

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2019
Merged

Conversation

dirkmc
Copy link
Contributor

@dirkmc dirkmc commented Dec 11, 2019

See #204

Copy link
Member

@alanshaw alanshaw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code changes look great 👍 - just one question...😨

@dirkmc dirkmc merged commit 0257c3d into feat/haves Dec 12, 2019
@dirkmc dirkmc deleted the feat/pending-bytes branch December 12, 2019 15:42
dirkmc added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2020
* feat: update message protobuf to support new message types

* fix: case of protobuf fields

* feat: include pending bytes in response message (#205)

* Feat/have new msg types (#211)

* feat: SortedMap

* refactor: make SortedMap more efficient

* feat: add request queue

* feat: support want-have & want-block in engine

* fix: block presences deserialization

* fix: ensure blocks are in blockstore before adding them to engine request queue

* fix: reduce engine queue contention

* feat: listen on bitswap/1.2.0 (#212)

* fix: several engine fixes

* refactor: rename some things

* docs: add some docs to task merger

* refactor: more efficient block receive

* docs: add message comments

* refactor: better var names in merger

* fix: merge with master
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants