improve documentation #1451
Merged
improve documentation #1451
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pinage404
force-pushed
the
improve_documentation
branch
from
8a92ad9 to
614491d
Compare
LucilleH
approved these changes
Sep 6, 2023
| * nodejs_19 (19.9.0) | ||
| * nodejs_20 (20.0.0) | ||
| ... | ||
| $ devbox search python |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Lagoja did you intend to include the nodejs results before, or was it supposed to be python?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it should be nodejs for this example, since the results look cleaner
Signed-off-by: John Lago <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Lago <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Lago <[email protected]>
|
Awesome, looks good to land! Thanks again @pinage404! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
I just discovered DevBox
I read the whole documentation
I found some errors
I did a big PR with anrelated content, if you disagree with some of the commits, i can split in several PR
How was it tested?
It's just markdown content, i haven't tested it