Skip to content

Update dependency and base image #3239

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 19, 2023

Conversation

oliviassss
Copy link
Collaborator

Issue

#3217
#3214

Description

Test:

  • Applied the new image to deployment, and the deployment was up and running, no issues observed.
  • Trivy scan returned no HIGH or CRITICAL CVEs for the new image.

Checklist

  • Added tests that cover your change (if possible)
  • Added/modified documentation as required (such as the README.md, or the docs directory)
  • Manually tested
  • Made sure the title of the PR is a good description that can go into the release notes

BONUS POINTS checklist: complete for good vibes and maybe prizes?! 🤯

  • Backfilled missing tests for code in same general area 🎉
  • Refactored something and made the world a better place 🌟

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 9, 2023
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (283ca6a) 54.70% compared to head (b8597e0) 54.70%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3239   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   54.70%   54.70%           
=======================================
  Files         148      148           
  Lines        8590     8590           
=======================================
  Hits         4699     4699           
  Misses       3559     3559           
  Partials      332      332           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@oliviassss oliviassss requested a review from kishorj June 9, 2023 20:26
@kishorj kishorj added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label Jun 12, 2023
@kishorj
Copy link
Collaborator

kishorj commented Jun 12, 2023

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 12, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kishorj, oliviassss

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants