Skip to content

feat: resolve health check port name for NLB #3419

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 16, 2023

Conversation

fad3t
Copy link
Contributor

@fad3t fad3t commented Oct 3, 2023

Issue

#3418

Description

This PR adds support for health check named ports. This is useful when the nodePort is dynamically assigned by the controller.

Checklist

  • Added tests that cover your change (if possible)
  • Added/modified documentation as required (such as the README.md, or the docs directory)
  • Manually tested
  • Made sure the title of the PR is a good description that can go into the release notes

BONUS POINTS checklist: complete for good vibes and maybe prizes?! 🤯

  • Backfilled missing tests for code in same general area 🎉
  • Refactored something and made the world a better place 🌟

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Oct 3, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @fad3t!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/aws-load-balancer-controller 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/aws-load-balancer-controller has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Oct 3, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @fad3t. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 3, 2023
@M00nF1sh
Copy link
Collaborator

M00nF1sh commented Oct 4, 2023

thanks for contributing.
Left some minor comments, the rest lgtm :D

@fad3t
Copy link
Contributor Author

fad3t commented Oct 5, 2023

thanks for contributing. Left some minor comments, the rest lgtm :D

Ahah, thanks for the review - I didn't realize about defaultModelBuildTask being available to the function 😄
I've removed the service argument, should be OK now.

@oliviassss oliviassss added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. tide/merge-method-merge Denotes a PR that should use a standard merge by tide when it merges. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Oct 13, 2023
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (eacb0c3) 55.76% compared to head (d06fdcf) 55.78%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3419      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   55.76%   55.78%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         149      149              
  Lines        8827     8834       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits         4922     4928       +6     
- Misses       3571     3572       +1     
  Partials      334      334              
Files Coverage Δ
pkg/targetgroupbinding/networking_manager.go 40.13% <ø> (ø)
pkg/service/model_build_target_group.go 87.55% <92.85%> (-0.03%) ⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@M00nF1sh M00nF1sh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 16, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fad3t, M00nF1sh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 16, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 631041d into kubernetes-sigs:main Oct 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-merge Denotes a PR that should use a standard merge by tide when it merges.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants