Skip to content

✨ Event broadcast opts #587

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

liztio
Copy link
Contributor

@liztio liztio commented Sep 6, 2019

New method to set correlator options for event recording
Unverified

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @liztio!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Sep 6, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: liztio
To complete the pull request process, please assign droot
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @droot in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 6, 2019
@liztio liztio force-pushed the event-broadcast-opts branch from bee18b0 to dcfceea Compare September 6, 2019 15:52
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 6, 2019
@liztio liztio changed the title [wip] ✨ Event broadcast opts ✨ Event broadcast opts Sep 6, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 6, 2019
@liztio
Copy link
Contributor Author

liztio commented Sep 6, 2019

I don't think I fully understand the implications of bumping client-go, is that likely to break other things?

@liztio liztio changed the title ✨ Event broadcast opts [wip] ✨ Event broadcast opts Sep 6, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 6, 2019
@liztio liztio changed the title [wip] ✨ Event broadcast opts ✨ Event broadcast opts Sep 6, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 6, 2019
@detiber
Copy link
Member

detiber commented Sep 6, 2019

/assign @DirectXMan12 @fanzhangio

This issue is affecting us in cluster-api where the Spam Filter is eating events we are generating.

@DirectXMan12
Copy link
Contributor

implications of bumping client-go

Yeah, this needs to be done carefully otherwise we accidentally break backwards compat

@DirectXMan12
Copy link
Contributor

besides the aforementioned bump issues (might just pull that in in #588 anyway), this needs at least one of

  • good docs
  • a sane wrapper

Alternatively, maybe we should just bump this up a level and let you set the recorder-provider directly?

@DirectXMan12
Copy link
Contributor

That way we don't need to carry a rather niche dependency on some highly-implementation-specific options

@liztio
Copy link
Contributor Author

liztio commented Sep 9, 2019

Alternatively, maybe we should just bump this up a level and let you set the recorder-provider directly?

that makes sense to me, let me mock up a PR rq

@liztio
Copy link
Contributor Author

liztio commented Sep 9, 2019

@DirectXMan12 does #591 look any better to you?

@DirectXMan12
Copy link
Contributor

yeah, let's switch to that one

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants