Skip to content

🏃 Remove usage of deprecated MatchingField list option #744

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

rajathagasthya
Copy link
Contributor

Replaces usage of deprecated MatchingField list option in tests with
MatchingFields.

Replaces usage of deprecated `MatchingField` list option in tests with
`MatchingFields`.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Dec 27, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @rajathagasthya. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 27, 2019
@alenkacz
Copy link
Contributor

alenkacz commented Jan 2, 2020

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@alenkacz: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@DirectXMan12
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 6, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: DirectXMan12, rajathagasthya

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 6, 2020
@DirectXMan12 DirectXMan12 changed the title ✨ Remove usage of deprecated MatchingField list option 🏃 Remove usage of deprecated MatchingField list option Jan 6, 2020
@rajathagasthya
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rajathagasthya: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@DirectXMan12
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jan 6, 2020
@DirectXMan12
Copy link
Contributor

silly bot, trix are for kids

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 790e761 into kubernetes-sigs:master Jan 6, 2020
@rajathagasthya rajathagasthya deleted the matching-fields branch January 6, 2020 23:06
DirectXMan12 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2020
🐛 fix missing add-to-scheme calls on new API version
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants