Improve memory_segments coverage

[DiegoCivi]

Improve memory_segments coverage

Description

Aims to omprove the test coverage on memory_segments. It ads the following tests:

• Test for calling .write_arg() with an invalid type.
• Test for calling .gen_arg() with a vector of Relocatables.
• Test for calling .is_valid_memory_value() with a felt.

Fixes #2108

Checklist

• Linked to Github Issue
• Unit tests added
• Integration tests added.
• This change requires new documentation.
  • Documentation has been added/updated.
  • CHANGELOG has been updated.

[github-actions]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     25.730 s ±  0.023 s    [User: 24.957 s, System: 0.769 s]
  Range (min … max):   25.713 s … 25.746 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     25.695 s ±  0.004 s    [User: 24.900 s, System: 0.792 s]
  Range (min … max):   25.692 s … 25.697 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 1 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 1




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.451 s ±  0.089 s    [User: 25.178 s, System: 0.822 s]
  Range (min … max):   14.388 s … 14.514 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.368 s ±  0.058 s    [User: 25.087 s, System: 0.798 s]
  Range (min … max):   14.327 s … 14.408 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 2 ran
    1.01 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 2




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.296 s ±  0.191 s    [User: 37.012 s, System: 0.978 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.161 s … 10.431 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.265 s ±  0.397 s    [User: 37.724 s, System: 0.997 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.984 s … 10.545 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 4 ran
    1.00 ± 0.04 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 4




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.225 s ±  0.103 s    [User: 37.796 s, System: 0.964 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.152 s … 10.298 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.286 s ±  0.221 s    [User: 37.379 s, System: 0.988 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.130 s … 10.442 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 6 ran
    1.01 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 6




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.279 s ±  0.188 s    [User: 37.961 s, System: 0.973 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.146 s … 10.413 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.161 s ±  0.095 s    [User: 38.028 s, System: 1.006 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.094 s … 10.228 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 8 ran
    1.01 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 8




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.106 s ±  0.031 s    [User: 38.346 s, System: 1.085 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.084 s … 10.128 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.188 s ±  0.001 s    [User: 38.538 s, System: 1.095 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.187 s … 10.188 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 16 ran
    1.01 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 16

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs 🚀

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_factorial	2.094 ± 0.030	2.062	2.166	1.00 ± 0.02
head big_factorial	2.092 ± 0.009	2.073	2.106	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_fibonacci	2.022 ± 0.011	2.007	2.045	1.00 ± 0.01
head big_fibonacci	2.014 ± 0.010	1.999	2.031	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.699 ± 0.040	7.643	7.756	1.01 ± 0.01
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.621 ± 0.078	7.530	7.770	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base compare_arrays_200000	2.143 ± 0.016	2.114	2.162	1.00 ± 0.01
head compare_arrays_200000	2.142 ± 0.018	2.113	2.179	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark	1.379 ± 0.012	1.359	1.391	1.00
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.387 ± 0.017	1.371	1.422	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.189 ± 0.008	1.175	1.199	1.00
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.196 ± 0.010	1.180	1.214	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base integration_builtins	7.682 ± 0.046	7.644	7.780	1.01 ± 0.01
head integration_builtins	7.632 ± 0.055	7.567	7.703	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark	7.898 ± 0.083	7.822	8.093	1.00
head keccak_integration_benchmark	8.012 ± 0.102	7.888	8.200	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search	2.104 ± 0.016	2.086	2.140	1.00
head linear_search	2.106 ± 0.015	2.070	2.125	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.451 ± 0.013	1.430	1.476	1.00 ± 0.01
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.450 ± 0.012	1.425	1.475	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_integration_benchmark	1.405 ± 0.008	1.391	1.416	1.01 ± 0.01
head math_integration_benchmark	1.392 ± 0.013	1.374	1.413	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark	1.166 ± 0.011	1.146	1.183	1.01 ± 0.01
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.158 ± 0.010	1.142	1.174	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.511 ± 0.011	1.495	1.529	1.00 ± 0.01
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.508 ± 0.019	1.472	1.547	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base pedersen	514.1 ± 7.4	501.5	524.6	1.00
head pedersen	514.2 ± 6.2	504.8	520.6	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark	600.2 ± 3.9	592.7	604.1	1.00
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	603.3 ± 4.3	596.4	611.1	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark	1.796 ± 0.010	1.780	1.811	1.01 ± 0.01
head secp_integration_benchmark	1.780 ± 0.018	1.757	1.803	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base set_integration_benchmark	612.0 ± 4.9	604.8	620.5	1.00 ± 0.01
head set_integration_benchmark	611.1 ± 5.4	601.1	621.8	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark	4.140 ± 0.018	4.120	4.181	1.00 ± 0.01
head uint256_integration_benchmark	4.132 ± 0.021	4.091	4.174	1.00

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.67%. Comparing base (2204910) to head (404c8c9).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2110      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.65%   96.67%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         103      103              
  Lines       43544    43597      +53     
==========================================
+ Hits        42089    42147      +58     
+ Misses       1455     1450       -5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[JulianGCalderon]

LGTM!