Skip to content

docs: improve readme structure #1448

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 28, 2025
Merged

docs: improve readme structure #1448

merged 6 commits into from
Apr 28, 2025

Conversation

lferrigno
Copy link
Contributor

This change enhances the README by improving its structure and content clarity.

Key changes include:

  • Refined the "Getting Started" and "Usage" sections for better readability and navigation.
  • Enhanced the "Roadmap" section with clearer formatting and progress tracking.
  • Updated links to relevant documentation for easier access.

These changes aim to make the README more user-friendly and informative for developers and contributors.

@lferrigno lferrigno changed the title docs: Improve README Structure and Content Clarity docs: improve readme structure Apr 24, 2025
@lferrigno lferrigno added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Apr 24, 2025
@lferrigno lferrigno marked this pull request as ready for review April 25, 2025 13:11
@lferrigno lferrigno requested a review from a team as a code owner April 25, 2025 13:11
Copy link
Collaborator

@rodrigo-o rodrigo-o left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome! I made a couple of suggestions but looks great overall.

@rodrigo-o rodrigo-o merged commit 4ab1c70 into main Apr 28, 2025
20 checks passed
@rodrigo-o rodrigo-o deleted the docs/refactor-readme branch April 28, 2025 21:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants