-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 411
Migrate some inner structs to TLVs #928
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
TheBlueMatt
merged 9 commits into
lightningdevkit:main
from
TheBlueMatt:2021-05-really-tlv-ser
May 27, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c9f6a35
Fix compile warnings reading type-0 TLVs
TheBlueMatt cf43002
Add a macro which implements Readable/Writeable using TLVs only
TheBlueMatt 557aa81
Add dummy OutPoint constructor to be used when reading it in a TLV
TheBlueMatt 9ec0f04
Move ChannelManager-inner structs to TLV storage
TheBlueMatt 321b19c
Move NetworkGraph inner structs to TLV storage
TheBlueMatt a749422
Add TLV suffix to PackageTemplate
TheBlueMatt c8bc1b6
Use TLV serialization for Commitment transaction structures
TheBlueMatt 45d86ea
Migrate packages sub-fields to TLV serialization
TheBlueMatt ad20bc7
Update net_graph used for benchmarks to use new ser format.
TheBlueMatt File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we consider simply implementing
Default
? I guess it exposes it outside the crate. Would be nice if traits could be implemented internally only.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yea, so initially I went down a rabbit hole on creating a whole trait for this stuff but I eventually just gave up and created a wrapper that deserializes into
Option
s. This one is left because its used outside of theimpl_writeable_tlv_based
macro, so its kinda a one-off.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If a one-off, consider inlining.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I found it to be a bit cleaner, but I'm happy to inline in channelmanager.rs if you prefer?