-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[mlir][nvgpu] Add nvgpu.rcp
OP
#100965
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
[mlir][nvgpu] Add nvgpu.rcp
OP
#100965
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit : In this dialect, we do not infer types. It is clearer to see the input and output directly in the IR. Otherwise, one would need to read TableGen or, even more challenging, the C++ implementation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I want to check the input/output type of
rcp
are equal withSameOperandsAndResultType
. So you suggested we'd better change to use verifier?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My point was about inferring the result type. When someone sees an IR like
%out = nvgpu.rcp_approx %in : vector<32x16xf32>
, the return type is unclear, making the IR unreadable. To understand the return type, one would need to look at the TableGen definition of the operation or read the C++ implementation.You could use
PredOpTrait
orSameOperandsAndResultType
, or handle it in the verifier. DoesSameOperandsAndResultType
forces to infer result type?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, got it. Let me update the assembly format.
Yes,
SameOperandsAndResultType
relies onInferTypeOpInterface
and it forces to create build function withInferReturnTypes
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about
PredOpTrait
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @joker-eph and @grypp , both of formats are good to me. Since most ops of nvgpu dialect have explicit result types, I personally think it is fine to follow this style.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consistency is important, so that's reasonable.
That said it's not a matter of majority: we can also see the nvgpu dialect as "not using the common upstream practices" and in need of an upgrade.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Recovered original style. Please help check if you have other questions about this pr, thanks a lot. :-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can upgrade it, but what's the guideline with inferring result types? It makes sense when input and output types same, like with
arith
. Otherwise, imho, it turns IR obscure and unreadable.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought this is the case we're talking about here? The example provided above was
%out = nvgpu.rcp_approx %in : vector<32x16xf32> -> vector<32x16xf32>
For the generality, it is slightly more subtle, for example what about
%res = memref.load %ptr[%idx] : memref<10xf32>
?