Skip to content

Revert "[SimplifyCFG] Skip threading if the target may have divergent branches" #100994

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

jplehr
Copy link
Contributor

@jplehr jplehr commented Jul 29, 2024

Reverts #100185

See comments on PR.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jul 29, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms

@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu

Author: Jan Patrick Lehr (jplehr)

Changes

Reverts llvm/llvm-project#100185

See comments on PR.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100994.diff

3 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp (+12-15)
  • (removed) llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/AMDGPU/skip-threading.ll (-44)
  • (modified) llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/convergent.ll (-39)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
index 1a17524b826a1..f23e28888931d 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
@@ -3246,12 +3246,7 @@ bool SimplifyCFGOpt::SpeculativelyExecuteBB(BranchInst *BI,
 }
 
 /// Return true if we can thread a branch across this block.
-static bool BlockIsSimpleEnoughToThreadThrough(BasicBlock *BB,
-                                               const TargetTransformInfo &TTI) {
-  // Skip threading if the branch may be divergent.
-  if (TTI.hasBranchDivergence(BB->getParent()))
-    return false;
-
+static bool BlockIsSimpleEnoughToThreadThrough(BasicBlock *BB) {
   int Size = 0;
   EphemeralValueTracker EphTracker;
 
@@ -3306,9 +3301,10 @@ static ConstantInt *getKnownValueOnEdge(Value *V, BasicBlock *From,
 /// If we have a conditional branch on something for which we know the constant
 /// value in predecessors (e.g. a phi node in the current block), thread edges
 /// from the predecessor to their ultimate destination.
-static std::optional<bool> FoldCondBranchOnValueKnownInPredecessorImpl(
-    BranchInst *BI, DomTreeUpdater *DTU, const DataLayout &DL,
-    const TargetTransformInfo &TTI, AssumptionCache *AC) {
+static std::optional<bool>
+FoldCondBranchOnValueKnownInPredecessorImpl(BranchInst *BI, DomTreeUpdater *DTU,
+                                            const DataLayout &DL,
+                                            AssumptionCache *AC) {
   SmallMapVector<ConstantInt *, SmallSetVector<BasicBlock *, 2>, 2> KnownValues;
   BasicBlock *BB = BI->getParent();
   Value *Cond = BI->getCondition();
@@ -3336,7 +3332,7 @@ static std::optional<bool> FoldCondBranchOnValueKnownInPredecessorImpl(
   // Now we know that this block has multiple preds and two succs.
   // Check that the block is small enough and values defined in the block are
   // not used outside of it.
-  if (!BlockIsSimpleEnoughToThreadThrough(BB, TTI))
+  if (!BlockIsSimpleEnoughToThreadThrough(BB))
     return false;
 
   for (const auto &Pair : KnownValues) {
@@ -3463,14 +3459,15 @@ static std::optional<bool> FoldCondBranchOnValueKnownInPredecessorImpl(
   return false;
 }
 
-static bool FoldCondBranchOnValueKnownInPredecessor(
-    BranchInst *BI, DomTreeUpdater *DTU, const DataLayout &DL,
-    const TargetTransformInfo &TTI, AssumptionCache *AC) {
+static bool FoldCondBranchOnValueKnownInPredecessor(BranchInst *BI,
+                                                    DomTreeUpdater *DTU,
+                                                    const DataLayout &DL,
+                                                    AssumptionCache *AC) {
   std::optional<bool> Result;
   bool EverChanged = false;
   do {
     // Note that None means "we changed things, but recurse further."
-    Result = FoldCondBranchOnValueKnownInPredecessorImpl(BI, DTU, DL, TTI, AC);
+    Result = FoldCondBranchOnValueKnownInPredecessorImpl(BI, DTU, DL, AC);
     EverChanged |= Result == std::nullopt || *Result;
   } while (Result == std::nullopt);
   return EverChanged;
@@ -7546,7 +7543,7 @@ bool SimplifyCFGOpt::simplifyCondBranch(BranchInst *BI, IRBuilder<> &Builder) {
   // If this is a branch on something for which we know the constant value in
   // predecessors (e.g. a phi node in the current block), thread control
   // through this block.
-  if (FoldCondBranchOnValueKnownInPredecessor(BI, DTU, DL, TTI, Options.AC))
+  if (FoldCondBranchOnValueKnownInPredecessor(BI, DTU, DL, Options.AC))
     return requestResimplify();
 
   // Scan predecessor blocks for conditional branches.
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/AMDGPU/skip-threading.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/AMDGPU/skip-threading.ll
deleted file mode 100644
index b1262e294c6d0..0000000000000
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/AMDGPU/skip-threading.ll
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
-; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5
-; RUN: opt -mtriple=amdgcn -S -passes=simplifycfg < %s | FileCheck %s
-
-declare void @bar1()
-declare void @bar2()
-declare void @bar3()
-
-define i32 @test_01a(i32 %a) {
-; CHECK-LABEL: define i32 @test_01a(
-; CHECK-SAME: i32 [[A:%.*]]) {
-; CHECK-NEXT:  [[ENTRY:.*:]]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[COND:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[A]], 0
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[COND]], label %[[MERGE:.*]], label %[[IF_FALSE:.*]]
-; CHECK:       [[IF_FALSE]]:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @bar1()
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %[[MERGE]]
-; CHECK:       [[MERGE]]:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @bar2()
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[COND]], label %[[EXIT:.*]], label %[[IF_FALSE_2:.*]]
-; CHECK:       [[IF_FALSE_2]]:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @bar3()
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %[[EXIT]]
-; CHECK:       [[EXIT]]:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i32 [[A]]
-;
-entry:
-  %cond = icmp eq i32 %a, 0
-  br i1 %cond, label %merge, label %if.false
-
-if.false:
-  call void @bar1()
-  br label %merge
-
-merge:
-  call void @bar2()
-  br i1 %cond, label %exit, label %if.false.2
-
-if.false.2:
-  call void @bar3()
-  br label %exit
-
-exit:
-  ret i32 %a
-}
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/convergent.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/convergent.ll
index d148063589de6..6ba51e06460c2 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/convergent.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/convergent.ll
@@ -4,9 +4,6 @@
 ; RUN: opt -S -passes='simplifycfg<hoist-common-insts;sink-common-insts>' < %s | FileCheck -check-prefixes=CHECK,SINK %s
 
 declare void @foo() convergent
-declare void @bar1()
-declare void @bar2()
-declare void @bar3()
 declare i32 @tid()
 declare i32 @mbcnt(i32 %a, i32 %b) convergent
 declare i32 @bpermute(i32 %a, i32 %b) convergent
@@ -48,42 +45,6 @@ exit:
   ret i32 %a
 }
 
-define i32 @test_01a(i32 %a) {
-; CHECK-LABEL: @test_01a(
-; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[COND:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[A:%.*]], 0
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[COND]], label [[EXIT_CRITEDGE:%.*]], label [[IF_FALSE:%.*]]
-; CHECK:       if.false:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @bar1()
-; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @bar2()
-; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @bar3()
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[EXIT:%.*]]
-; CHECK:       exit.critedge:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @bar2()
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[EXIT]]
-; CHECK:       exit:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i32 [[A]]
-;
-entry:
-  %cond = icmp eq i32 %a, 0
-  br i1 %cond, label %merge, label %if.false
-
-if.false:
-  call void @bar1()
-  br label %merge
-
-merge:
-  call void @bar2()
-  br i1 %cond, label %exit, label %if.false.2
-
-if.false.2:
-  call void @bar3()
-  br label %exit
-
-exit:
-  ret i32 %a
-}
-
 define void @test_02(ptr %y.coerce) convergent {
 ; NOSINK-LABEL: @test_02(
 ; NOSINK-NEXT:  entry:

@jplehr jplehr merged commit a347bdb into main Jul 29, 2024
7 of 9 checks passed
@jplehr jplehr deleted the revert-100185-users/darkbuck/spr/simplifycfg-skip-threading-if-the-target-may-have-divergent-branches branch July 29, 2024 09:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants