Skip to content

[clang] Fix crash with multiple non-parenthsized sizeof #101297

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 1, 2024

Conversation

Endilll
Copy link
Contributor

@Endilll Endilll commented Jul 31, 2024

There are 5 unary operators that can be followed by a non-parenthesized expression: sizeof, __datasizeof, __alignof, alignof, _Alignof. When we nest them too deep, BalancedDelimiterTracker does not help, because there are no parentheses, and we crash. Instead, this patch recognize chains of those operators, and parse them with sufficient stack space.

Fixes #45061

@Endilll Endilll added the clang:frontend Language frontend issues, e.g. anything involving "Sema" label Jul 31, 2024
@Endilll Endilll requested review from cor3ntin and AaronBallman July 31, 2024 07:33
@llvmbot llvmbot added the clang Clang issues not falling into any other category label Jul 31, 2024
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jul 31, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Vlad Serebrennikov (Endilll)

Changes

There are 5 unary operators that can be followed by a non-parenthesized expression: sizeof, __datasizeof, __alignof, alignof, _Alignof. When we nest them too deep, BalancedDelimiterTracker does not help, because there are no parentheses, and we crash. Instead, this patch recognize chains of those operators, and parse them with sufficient stack space.

Fixes #45061


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101297.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp (+13-1)
  • (added) clang/test/Parser/parser-overflow-non-parenthesized.c (+135)
diff --git a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp
index e82b565272831..e501d5e91e77d 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp
@@ -2479,7 +2479,19 @@ Parser::ParseExprAfterUnaryExprOrTypeTrait(const Token &OpTok,
       return ExprError();
     }
 
-    Operand = ParseCastExpression(UnaryExprOnly);
+    // If we're parsing a chain that consists of keywords that could be
+    // followed by a non-parenthesized expression, BalancedDelimiterTracker
+    // is not going to help when the nesting is too deep. In this corner case
+    // we continue to parse with sufficient stack space to avoid crashing.
+    if (OpTok.isOneOf(tok::kw_sizeof, tok::kw___datasizeof, tok::kw___alignof,
+                      tok::kw_alignof, tok::kw__Alignof) &&
+        Tok.isOneOf(tok::kw_sizeof, tok::kw___datasizeof, tok::kw___alignof,
+                    tok::kw_alignof, tok::kw__Alignof))
+      Actions.runWithSufficientStackSpace(Tok.getLocation(), [&] {
+        Operand = ParseCastExpression(UnaryExprOnly);
+      });
+    else
+      Operand = ParseCastExpression(UnaryExprOnly);
   } else {
     // If it starts with a '(', we know that it is either a parenthesized
     // type-name, or it is a unary-expression that starts with a compound
diff --git a/clang/test/Parser/parser-overflow-non-parenthesized.c b/clang/test/Parser/parser-overflow-non-parenthesized.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..b6c7485274090
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/Parser/parser-overflow-non-parenthesized.c
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+void f(void) {
+  // 600 sizeof's
+  int a =
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof sizeof
+  0;
+  (void)a;
+
+  // 600 of sizeof and __alignof
+  int b =
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof sizeof __alignof
+  0;
+  (void)b;
+}
+
+// CHECK: warning: stack nearly exhausted; compilation time may suffer, and crashes due to stack overflow are likely

Copy link
Collaborator

@AaronBallman AaronBallman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For reference, we explored whether this could be done by using tail-call elimination (it can't, at least not in any straightforward way); the peek-ahead approach was the best tradeoff we could find. (We peek ahead to try to limit the performance issues to folks doing sizeof sizeof ... which should hopefully be a pretty rare situation given that will always result in sizeof(size_t).)

Testing for stack exhaustion is always a challenge and so it is reasonable for this to not come with a test case. However, did you manually verify that it fixes the crash for you?

The changes LGTM, but please keep an eye on the LLVM compile time tracker once this lands to see whether peeking ahead introduced some significant performance issue we didn't expect.

@Endilll
Copy link
Contributor Author

Endilll commented Aug 1, 2024

Testing for stack exhaustion is always a challenge and so it is reasonable for this to not come with a test case. However, did you manually verify that it fixes the crash for you?

Yes, the test I originally included wasn't passing without my fix, but passed with my fix locally.

@Endilll Endilll merged commit 130c135 into llvm:main Aug 1, 2024
8 checks passed
@Endilll Endilll deleted the fix-sizeof-sizeof-crash branch August 1, 2024 13:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clang:frontend Language frontend issues, e.g. anything involving "Sema" clang Clang issues not falling into any other category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Missing a recursion guard for sizeof
3 participants