[NFC] Fix an incorrect comment about operator precedence.

[mpark]

The comment talks about left-associative operators twice, when the latter mention is actually describing right-associative operators.

[llvmbot]

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Michael Park (mpark)

Changes

The comment talks about left-associative operators twice, when the latter mention is actually describing right-associative operators.

---

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105784.diff

1 Files Affected:

• (modified) clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp (+1-1)

diff --git a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp
index 1405aef700bec5..64f284d78b24db 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp
@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ Parser::ParseRHSOfBinaryExpression(ExprResult LHS, prec::Level MinPrec) {
         RHS = ExprError();
       }
       // If this is left-associative, only parse things on the RHS that bind
-      // more tightly than the current operator.  If it is left-associative, it
+      // more tightly than the current operator.  If it is right-associative, it
       // is okay, to bind exactly as tightly.  For example, compile A=B=C=D as
       // A=(B=(C=D)), where each paren is a level of recursion here.
       // The function takes ownership of the RHS.

[cor3ntin]

Thanks (Hi!). Do you have commit access or should I merge that for you?

[mpark]

Thanks (Hi!). Do you have commit access or should I merge that for you?

Hi Corentin! I have commit access 🙂