Skip to content

[lldb/DWARF] Cache negative results of variable parsing #108810

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

labath
Copy link
Collaborator

@labath labath commented Sep 16, 2024

Use a nullptr map entry to mean "variable parse was attempted and it failed" an the absence of an entry to mean "parsing hasn't been attempted yet".

I ran into this because parsing of function-static variables was generating a lot of errors (see #108806), but this seems like a good idea in general.

In theory this should be NFC, except for possibly reducing some amount of work.

Use a `nullptr` map entry to mean "variable parse was attempted and it
failed" an the absence of an entry to mean "parsing hasn't been
attempted yet".

I ran into this because parsing of function-static variables was
generating a lot of errors (see llvm#108806), but this seems like a good
idea in general.

In theory this should be NFC, except for possibly reducing some amount
of work.
@llvmbot llvmbot added the lldb label Sep 16, 2024
@labath labath requested a review from clayborg September 16, 2024 09:52
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Sep 16, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb

Author: Pavel Labath (labath)

Changes

Use a nullptr map entry to mean "variable parse was attempted and it failed" an the absence of an entry to mean "parsing hasn't been attempted yet".

I ran into this because parsing of function-static variables was generating a lot of errors (see #108806), but this seems like a good idea in general.

In theory this should be NFC, except for possibly reducing some amount of work.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108810.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/SymbolFileDWARF.cpp (+12-14)
diff --git a/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/SymbolFileDWARF.cpp b/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/SymbolFileDWARF.cpp
index f721ca00fd3559..bacea848988467 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/SymbolFileDWARF.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/SymbolFileDWARF.cpp
@@ -3377,16 +3377,13 @@ VariableSP SymbolFileDWARF::ParseVariableDIECached(const SymbolContext &sc,
 
   DIEToVariableSP &die_to_variable = die.GetDWARF()->GetDIEToVariable();
 
-  VariableSP var_sp = die_to_variable[die.GetDIE()];
-  if (var_sp)
-    return var_sp;
-
-  var_sp = ParseVariableDIE(sc, die, LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS);
-  if (var_sp) {
-    die_to_variable[die.GetDIE()] = var_sp;
-    if (DWARFDIE spec_die = die.GetReferencedDIE(DW_AT_specification))
-      die_to_variable[spec_die.GetDIE()] = var_sp;
-  }
+  if (auto it = die_to_variable.find(die.GetDIE()); it != die_to_variable.end())
+    return it->second;
+
+  VariableSP var_sp = ParseVariableDIE(sc, die, LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS);
+  die_to_variable.insert_or_assign(die.GetDIE(), var_sp);
+  if (DWARFDIE spec_die = die.GetReferencedDIE(DW_AT_specification))
+    die_to_variable.insert_or_assign(spec_die.GetDIE(), var_sp);
   return var_sp;
 }
 
@@ -3799,9 +3796,10 @@ void SymbolFileDWARF::ParseAndAppendGlobalVariable(
     return;
 
   // Check to see if we have already parsed this variable or constant?
-  VariableSP var_sp = GetDIEToVariable()[die.GetDIE()];
-  if (var_sp) {
-    cc_variable_list.AddVariableIfUnique(var_sp);
+  DIEToVariableSP &die_to_variable = GetDIEToVariable();
+  if (auto it = die_to_variable.find(die.GetDIE());
+      it != die_to_variable.end()) {
+    cc_variable_list.AddVariableIfUnique(it->second);
     return;
   }
 
@@ -3835,7 +3833,7 @@ void SymbolFileDWARF::ParseAndAppendGlobalVariable(
     return;
   }
 
-  var_sp = ParseVariableDIECached(sc, die);
+  VariableSP var_sp = ParseVariableDIECached(sc, die);
   if (!var_sp)
     return;
 

Copy link
Member

@Michael137 Michael137 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are there cases where we fail to ParseVariableDIE the first time around but could succeed later on in the debug sessions?

This comment seems to suggest that's possible:

if (!symbol_context_scope) {
// Not ready to parse this variable yet. It might be a global or static
// variable that is in a function scope and the function in the symbol
// context wasn't filled in yet
return nullptr;
}

@labath
Copy link
Collaborator Author

labath commented Sep 19, 2024

Good find. Somewhat surprising, but I guess it's possible. I'll try to look into whether this is some defensive coding or if this can legitimately happen for some reason.

@labath labath marked this pull request as draft September 19, 2024 13:07
@labath labath closed this Nov 8, 2024
@labath labath deleted the cache branch November 8, 2024 12:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants