Skip to content

[SimplifyCFG] Better aligned a comment. #109307

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024
Merged

[SimplifyCFG] Better aligned a comment. #109307

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
3a2e0fe
[SimplifyCFG] Better aligned a comment.
scampanoni Sep 19, 2024
4ee5b91
[SimplifyCFG] Run the git-clang-format
scampanoni Sep 30, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -405,9 +405,9 @@ static InstructionCost computeSpeculationCost(const User *I,
}

/// If we have a merge point of an "if condition" as accepted above,
/// return true if the specified value dominates the block. We
/// don't handle the true generality of domination here, just a special case
/// which works well enough for us.
/// return true if the specified value dominates the block. We don't handle
/// the true generality of domination here, just a special case which works
/// well enough for us.
///
/// If AggressiveInsts is non-null, and if V does not dominate BB, we check to
/// see if V (which must be an instruction) and its recursive operands
Expand Down
Loading