Skip to content

[readtapi] Add option to ignore architecture slices to ignore #110615

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2024

Conversation

cyndyishida
Copy link
Member

For qualification purposes, it's helpful to ignore certain slices that can be expected to differ.

For qualification purposes, it's helpful to ignore certain slices that
can be expected to differ.
@cyndyishida cyndyishida requested a review from zixu-w October 1, 2024 01:22
@cyndyishida cyndyishida merged commit 5134048 into llvm:main Oct 1, 2024
9 checks passed
@cyndyishida cyndyishida deleted the eng/PR-morequals branch October 1, 2024 21:31
Sterling-Augustine pushed a commit to Sterling-Augustine/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
…10615)

For qualification purposes, it's helpful to ignore certain slices that
can be expected to differ.
cyndyishida added a commit to cyndyishida/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2024
…10615)

For qualification purposes, it's helpful to ignore certain slices that
can be expected to differ.

(cherry picked from commit 5134048)
cyndyishida added a commit to swiftlang/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2024
…10615)

For qualification purposes, it's helpful to ignore certain slices that
can be expected to differ.

(cherry picked from commit 5134048)
cyndyishida added a commit to cyndyishida/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2024
…10615)

For qualification purposes, it's helpful to ignore certain slices that
can be expected to differ.

(cherry picked from commit 5134048)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants