Skip to content

[clang-format] Fix a bug that misannotates binary operators */&/&& #110945

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2024

Conversation

owenca
Copy link
Contributor

@owenca owenca commented Oct 3, 2024

Fixes #110879.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Oct 3, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format

Author: Owen Pan (owenca)

Changes

Fixes #110879.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110945.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp (+1-1)
  • (modified) clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp (+8)
diff --git a/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp b/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
index 5398e2dadd485a..e2068e557732af 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ class AnnotatingParser {
     } else if (OpeningParen.Previous &&
                (OpeningParen.Previous->isOneOf(
                     tok::kw_static_assert, tok::kw_noexcept, tok::kw_explicit,
-                    tok::kw_while, tok::l_paren, tok::comma,
+                    tok::kw_while, tok::l_paren, tok::comma, TT_CastRParen,
                     TT_BinaryOperator) ||
                 OpeningParen.Previous->isIf())) {
       // static_assert, if and while usually contain expressions.
diff --git a/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp b/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
index de1346b5ddd5a7..a89adfa3f4fdd9 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
+++ b/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
@@ -367,6 +367,14 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsUsesOfStarAndAmp) {
                     "}");
   ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 20u) << Tokens;
   EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[14], tok::star, TT_PointerOrReference);
+
+  Tokens = annotate("Thingy kConfig = {\n"
+                    "    1,\n"
+                    "    (uint16_t)(kScale * height_pixels),\n"
+                    "};");
+  ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 18u) << Tokens;
+  EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[8], tok::r_paren, TT_CastRParen);
+  EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[11], tok::star, TT_BinaryOperator);
 }
 
 TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsUsesOfPlusAndMinus) {

@owenca owenca changed the title [clang-format] Fix a bug in annotating PointerOrReference [clang-format] Fix a bug that misannotates binary operators */&/&& Oct 3, 2024
@owenca owenca merged commit eaff3a7 into llvm:main Oct 4, 2024
10 checks passed
@owenca owenca deleted the 110879 branch October 4, 2024 01:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

clang-format: Incorrectly formats multiplication as if it was pointer dereference
3 participants