-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[SandboxVec][DAG] Avoid unnecessary dependency scan and improve description #112057
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-vectorizers @llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms Author: vporpo (vporpo) ChangesWhen NewInterval is below DAGInterval we used to revisit instructions already visited. This patch fixes this by separating the scan in two:
This is further explained in the new description. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112057.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SandboxVectorizer/DependencyGraph.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SandboxVectorizer/DependencyGraph.cpp
index a8e362571837cc..1043c85f78e141 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SandboxVectorizer/DependencyGraph.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SandboxVectorizer/DependencyGraph.cpp
@@ -276,30 +276,44 @@ Interval<Instruction> DependencyGraph::extend(ArrayRef<Instruction *> Instrs) {
// Create the dependencies.
//
- // 1. DAGInterval empty 2. New is below Old 3. New is above old
- // ------------------------ ------------------- -------------------
- // Scan: DstN: Scan:
- // +---+ -ScanTopN +---+DstTopN -ScanTopN
- // | | | |New| |
- // |Old| | +---+ -ScanBotN
- // | | | +---+
- // DstN: Scan: +---+DstN: | | |
- // +---+DstTopN -ScanTopN +---+DstTopN | |Old|
- // |New| | |New| | | |
- // +---+DstBotN -ScanBotN +---+DstBotN -ScanBotN +---+DstBotN
-
- // 1. This is a new DAG.
- if (DAGInterval.empty()) {
- assert(NewInterval == InstrsInterval && "Expected empty DAGInterval!");
- auto DstRange = MemDGNodeIntervalBuilder::make(NewInterval, *this);
+ // 1. This is a new DAG, DAGInterval is empty. Fully scan the whole interval.
+ // +---+ - -
+ // | | SrcN | |
+ // | | | | SrcRange |
+ // |New| v | | DstRange
+ // | | DstN - |
+ // | | |
+ // +---+ -
+ // We are scanning for deps with destination in NewInterval and sources in
+ // NewInterval until DstN, for each DstN.
+ auto FullScan = [this](const Interval<Instruction> Intvl) {
+ auto DstRange = MemDGNodeIntervalBuilder::make(Intvl, *this);
if (!DstRange.empty()) {
for (MemDGNode &DstN : drop_begin(DstRange)) {
auto SrcRange = Interval<MemDGNode>(DstRange.top(), DstN.getPrevNode());
scanAndAddDeps(DstN, SrcRange);
}
}
+ };
+ if (DAGInterval.empty()) {
+ assert(NewInterval == InstrsInterval && "Expected empty DAGInterval!");
+ FullScan(NewInterval);
}
// 2. The new section is below the old section.
+ // +---+ -
+ // | | |
+ // |Old| SrcN |
+ // | | | |
+ // +---+ | | SrcRange
+ // +---+ | | -
+ // | | | | |
+ // |New| v | | DstRange
+ // | | DstN - |
+ // | | |
+ // +---+ -
+ // We are scanning for deps with destination in NewInterval because the deps
+ // in DAGInterval have already been computed. We consider sources in the whole
+ // range including both NewInterval and DAGInterval until DstN, for each DstN.
else if (DAGInterval.bottom()->comesBefore(NewInterval.top())) {
auto DstRange = MemDGNodeIntervalBuilder::make(NewInterval, *this);
auto SrcRangeFull = MemDGNodeIntervalBuilder::make(
@@ -312,16 +326,40 @@ Interval<Instruction> DependencyGraph::extend(ArrayRef<Instruction *> Instrs) {
}
// 3. The new section is above the old section.
else if (NewInterval.bottom()->comesBefore(DAGInterval.top())) {
- auto DstRange = MemDGNodeIntervalBuilder::make(
- NewInterval.getUnionInterval(DAGInterval), *this);
- auto SrcRangeFull = MemDGNodeIntervalBuilder::make(NewInterval, *this);
- if (!DstRange.empty()) {
- for (MemDGNode &DstN : drop_begin(DstRange)) {
- auto SrcRange =
- Interval<MemDGNode>(SrcRangeFull.top(), DstN.getPrevNode());
- scanAndAddDeps(DstN, SrcRange);
- }
- }
+ // +---+ - -
+ // | | SrcN | |
+ // |New| | | SrcRange | DstRange
+ // | | v | |
+ // | | DstN - |
+ // | | |
+ // +---+ -
+ // +---+
+ // |Old|
+ // | |
+ // +---+
+ // When scanning for deps with destination in NewInterval we need to
+ // consider all sources from the top of NewInterval until DstN, because
+ // this interval is new and contains no existing memory deps.
+ FullScan(NewInterval);
+
+ // +---+ -
+ // | | |
+ // |New| SrcN | SrcRange
+ // | | | |
+ // | | | |
+ // | | | |
+ // +---+ | -
+ // +---+ | -
+ // |Old| v | DstRange
+ // | | DstN |
+ // +---+ -
+ // When scanning for deps with destination in DAGInterval we need to
+ // consider sources from the NewInterval only, because all intra-DAGInterval
+ // dependencies have already been created.
+ auto DstRangeOld = MemDGNodeIntervalBuilder::make(DAGInterval, *this);
+ auto SrcRange = MemDGNodeIntervalBuilder::make(NewInterval, *this);
+ for (MemDGNode &DstN : DstRangeOld)
+ scanAndAddDeps(DstN, SrcRange);
} else {
llvm_unreachable("We don't expect extending in both directions!");
}
|
…iption When NewInterval is below DAGInterval we used to revisit instructions already visited. This patch fixes this by separating the scan in two: 1. The full scan of the NewInterval, and 2. The cross-interval scan for DAGInterval. This is further explained in the new description.
Updated the description of 3rd case . We are now calling |
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/30/builds/8219 Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference
|
…iption (llvm#112057) When NewInterval is below DAGInterval we used to revisit instructions already visited. This patch fixes this by separating the scan in two: 1. The full scan of the NewInterval, and 2. The cross-interval scan for DAGInterval. This is further explained in the new description.
When NewInterval is below DAGInterval we used to revisit instructions already visited. This patch fixes this by separating the scan in two:
This is further explained in the new description.