Skip to content

[nfc][lsan] Extract significant part of the loop into a function #112610

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

vitalybuka
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Oct 16, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer

Author: Vitaly Buka (vitalybuka)

Changes

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112610.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) compiler-rt/lib/lsan/lsan_common.cpp (+108-101)
diff --git a/compiler-rt/lib/lsan/lsan_common.cpp b/compiler-rt/lib/lsan/lsan_common.cpp
index a1a15bf98a1183..721db7872cce83 100644
--- a/compiler-rt/lib/lsan/lsan_common.cpp
+++ b/compiler-rt/lib/lsan/lsan_common.cpp
@@ -399,6 +399,112 @@ static void ProcessThreadRegistry(Frontier *frontier) {
 }
 
 // Scans thread data (stacks and TLS) for heap pointers.
+static void ProcessThread(tid_t os_id, uptr sp,
+                          const InternalMmapVector<uptr> &registers,
+                          InternalMmapVector<Range> &extra_ranges,
+                          Frontier *frontier) {
+  // `extra_ranges` is outside of the function and the loop to reused mapped
+  // memory.
+  CHECK(extra_ranges.empty());
+  LOG_THREADS("Processing thread %llu.\n", os_id);
+  uptr stack_begin, stack_end, tls_begin, tls_end, cache_begin, cache_end;
+  DTLS *dtls;
+  bool thread_found =
+      GetThreadRangesLocked(os_id, &stack_begin, &stack_end, &tls_begin,
+                            &tls_end, &cache_begin, &cache_end, &dtls);
+  if (!thread_found) {
+    // If a thread can't be found in the thread registry, it's probably in the
+    // process of destruction. Log this event and move on.
+    LOG_THREADS("Thread %llu not found in registry.\n", os_id);
+    return;
+  }
+
+  if (!sp)
+    sp = stack_begin;
+
+  if (flags()->use_registers) {
+    uptr registers_begin = reinterpret_cast<uptr>(registers.data());
+    uptr registers_end =
+        reinterpret_cast<uptr>(registers.data() + registers.size());
+    ScanRangeForPointers(registers_begin, registers_end, frontier, "REGISTERS",
+                         kReachable);
+  }
+
+  if (flags()->use_stacks) {
+    LOG_THREADS("Stack at %p-%p (SP = %p).\n", (void *)stack_begin,
+                (void *)stack_end, (void *)sp);
+    if (sp < stack_begin || sp >= stack_end) {
+      // SP is outside the recorded stack range (e.g. the thread is running a
+      // signal handler on alternate stack, or swapcontext was used).
+      // Again, consider the entire stack range to be reachable.
+      LOG_THREADS("WARNING: stack pointer not in stack range.\n");
+      uptr page_size = GetPageSizeCached();
+      int skipped = 0;
+      while (stack_begin < stack_end &&
+             !IsAccessibleMemoryRange(stack_begin, 1)) {
+        skipped++;
+        stack_begin += page_size;
+      }
+      LOG_THREADS("Skipped %d guard page(s) to obtain stack %p-%p.\n", skipped,
+                  (void *)stack_begin, (void *)stack_end);
+    } else {
+      // Shrink the stack range to ignore out-of-scope values.
+      stack_begin = sp;
+    }
+    ScanRangeForPointers(stack_begin, stack_end, frontier, "STACK", kReachable);
+    GetThreadExtraStackRangesLocked(os_id, &extra_ranges);
+    ScanExtraStackRanges(extra_ranges, frontier);
+  }
+
+  if (flags()->use_tls) {
+    if (tls_begin) {
+      LOG_THREADS("TLS at %p-%p.\n", (void *)tls_begin, (void *)tls_end);
+      // If the tls and cache ranges don't overlap, scan full tls range,
+      // otherwise, only scan the non-overlapping portions
+      if (cache_begin == cache_end || tls_end < cache_begin ||
+          tls_begin > cache_end) {
+        ScanRangeForPointers(tls_begin, tls_end, frontier, "TLS", kReachable);
+      } else {
+        if (tls_begin < cache_begin)
+          ScanRangeForPointers(tls_begin, cache_begin, frontier, "TLS",
+                               kReachable);
+        if (tls_end > cache_end)
+          ScanRangeForPointers(cache_end, tls_end, frontier, "TLS", kReachable);
+      }
+    }
+#    if SANITIZER_ANDROID
+    auto *cb = +[](void *dtls_begin, void *dtls_end, uptr /*dso_idd*/,
+                   void *arg) -> void {
+      ScanRangeForPointers(
+          reinterpret_cast<uptr>(dtls_begin), reinterpret_cast<uptr>(dtls_end),
+          reinterpret_cast<Frontier *>(arg), "DTLS", kReachable);
+    };
+
+    // FIXME: There might be a race-condition here (and in Bionic) if the
+    // thread is suspended in the middle of updating its DTLS. IOWs, we
+    // could scan already freed memory. (probably fine for now)
+    __libc_iterate_dynamic_tls(os_id, cb, frontier);
+#    else
+    if (dtls && !DTLSInDestruction(dtls)) {
+      ForEachDVT(dtls, [&](const DTLS::DTV &dtv, int id) {
+        uptr dtls_beg = dtv.beg;
+        uptr dtls_end = dtls_beg + dtv.size;
+        if (dtls_beg < dtls_end) {
+          LOG_THREADS("DTLS %d at %p-%p.\n", id, (void *)dtls_beg,
+                      (void *)dtls_end);
+          ScanRangeForPointers(dtls_beg, dtls_end, frontier, "DTLS",
+                               kReachable);
+        }
+      });
+    } else {
+      // We are handling a thread with DTLS under destruction. Log about
+      // this and continue.
+      LOG_THREADS("Thread %llu has DTLS under destruction.\n", os_id);
+    }
+#    endif
+  }
+}
+
 static void ProcessThreads(SuspendedThreadsList const &suspended_threads,
                            Frontier *frontier, tid_t caller_tid,
                            uptr caller_sp) {
@@ -408,7 +514,7 @@ static void ProcessThreads(SuspendedThreadsList const &suspended_threads,
     registers.clear();
     extra_ranges.clear();
 
-    const tid_t os_id = static_cast<tid_t>(suspended_threads.GetThreadID(i));
+    const tid_t os_id = suspended_threads.GetThreadID(i);
     uptr sp = 0;
     PtraceRegistersStatus have_registers =
         suspended_threads.GetRegistersAndSP(i, &registers, &sp);
@@ -421,109 +527,10 @@ static void ProcessThreads(SuspendedThreadsList const &suspended_threads,
       sp = 0;
     }
 
-    LOG_THREADS("Processing thread %llu.\n", os_id);
-    uptr stack_begin, stack_end, tls_begin, tls_end, cache_begin, cache_end;
-    DTLS *dtls;
-    bool thread_found =
-        GetThreadRangesLocked(os_id, &stack_begin, &stack_end, &tls_begin,
-                              &tls_end, &cache_begin, &cache_end, &dtls);
-    if (!thread_found) {
-      // If a thread can't be found in the thread registry, it's probably in the
-      // process of destruction. Log this event and move on.
-      LOG_THREADS("Thread %llu not found in registry.\n", os_id);
-      continue;
-    }
-
     if (os_id == caller_tid)
       sp = caller_sp;
 
-    if (!sp)
-      sp = stack_begin;
-
-    if (flags()->use_registers && have_registers) {
-      uptr registers_begin = reinterpret_cast<uptr>(registers.data());
-      uptr registers_end =
-          reinterpret_cast<uptr>(registers.data() + registers.size());
-      ScanRangeForPointers(registers_begin, registers_end, frontier,
-                           "REGISTERS", kReachable);
-    }
-
-    if (flags()->use_stacks) {
-      LOG_THREADS("Stack at %p-%p (SP = %p).\n", (void *)stack_begin,
-                  (void *)stack_end, (void *)sp);
-      if (sp < stack_begin || sp >= stack_end) {
-        // SP is outside the recorded stack range (e.g. the thread is running a
-        // signal handler on alternate stack, or swapcontext was used).
-        // Again, consider the entire stack range to be reachable.
-        LOG_THREADS("WARNING: stack pointer not in stack range.\n");
-        uptr page_size = GetPageSizeCached();
-        int skipped = 0;
-        while (stack_begin < stack_end &&
-               !IsAccessibleMemoryRange(stack_begin, 1)) {
-          skipped++;
-          stack_begin += page_size;
-        }
-        LOG_THREADS("Skipped %d guard page(s) to obtain stack %p-%p.\n",
-                    skipped, (void *)stack_begin, (void *)stack_end);
-      } else {
-        // Shrink the stack range to ignore out-of-scope values.
-        stack_begin = sp;
-      }
-      ScanRangeForPointers(stack_begin, stack_end, frontier, "STACK",
-                           kReachable);
-      GetThreadExtraStackRangesLocked(os_id, &extra_ranges);
-      ScanExtraStackRanges(extra_ranges, frontier);
-    }
-
-    if (flags()->use_tls) {
-      if (tls_begin) {
-        LOG_THREADS("TLS at %p-%p.\n", (void *)tls_begin, (void *)tls_end);
-        // If the tls and cache ranges don't overlap, scan full tls range,
-        // otherwise, only scan the non-overlapping portions
-        if (cache_begin == cache_end || tls_end < cache_begin ||
-            tls_begin > cache_end) {
-          ScanRangeForPointers(tls_begin, tls_end, frontier, "TLS", kReachable);
-        } else {
-          if (tls_begin < cache_begin)
-            ScanRangeForPointers(tls_begin, cache_begin, frontier, "TLS",
-                                 kReachable);
-          if (tls_end > cache_end)
-            ScanRangeForPointers(cache_end, tls_end, frontier, "TLS",
-                                 kReachable);
-        }
-      }
-#    if SANITIZER_ANDROID
-      auto *cb = +[](void *dtls_begin, void *dtls_end, uptr /*dso_idd*/,
-                     void *arg) -> void {
-        ScanRangeForPointers(reinterpret_cast<uptr>(dtls_begin),
-                             reinterpret_cast<uptr>(dtls_end),
-                             reinterpret_cast<Frontier *>(arg), "DTLS",
-                             kReachable);
-      };
-
-      // FIXME: There might be a race-condition here (and in Bionic) if the
-      // thread is suspended in the middle of updating its DTLS. IOWs, we
-      // could scan already freed memory. (probably fine for now)
-      __libc_iterate_dynamic_tls(os_id, cb, frontier);
-#    else
-      if (dtls && !DTLSInDestruction(dtls)) {
-        ForEachDVT(dtls, [&](const DTLS::DTV &dtv, int id) {
-          uptr dtls_beg = dtv.beg;
-          uptr dtls_end = dtls_beg + dtv.size;
-          if (dtls_beg < dtls_end) {
-            LOG_THREADS("DTLS %d at %p-%p.\n", id, (void *)dtls_beg,
-                        (void *)dtls_end);
-            ScanRangeForPointers(dtls_beg, dtls_end, frontier, "DTLS",
-                                 kReachable);
-          }
-        });
-      } else {
-        // We are handling a thread with DTLS under destruction. Log about
-        // this and continue.
-        LOG_THREADS("Thread %llu has DTLS under destruction.\n", os_id);
-      }
-#    endif
-    }
+    ProcessThread(os_id, sp, registers, extra_ranges, frontier);
   }
 
   // Add pointers reachable from ThreadContexts

thetruestblue and others added 2 commits October 16, 2024 22:44
Created using spr 1.3.4

[skip ci]
Created using spr 1.3.4
@vitalybuka vitalybuka changed the base branch from users/vitalybuka/spr/main.nfclsan-extract-significant-part-of-the-loop-into-a-function to main October 17, 2024 05:45
@vitalybuka vitalybuka merged commit 3142dff into main Oct 17, 2024
7 of 10 checks passed
@vitalybuka vitalybuka deleted the users/vitalybuka/spr/nfclsan-extract-significant-part-of-the-loop-into-a-function branch October 17, 2024 05:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants