Skip to content

[flang][openacc] Avoid crash when variable is not declared in reduction #114603

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2024

Conversation

clementval
Copy link
Contributor

@clementval clementval commented Nov 1, 2024

Do not check reduction type when the variable has not been declared. Correct error is then emitted.

@llvmbot llvmbot added flang Flang issues not falling into any other category openacc flang:semantics labels Nov 1, 2024
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Nov 1, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-openacc

@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-semantics

Author: Valentin Clement (バレンタイン クレメン) (clementval)

Changes

Do not check redutction type when the variable has not been declared. Correct error is then emitted.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114603.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) flang/lib/Semantics/check-acc-structure.cpp (+21-19)
  • (modified) flang/test/Semantics/OpenACC/acc-reduction-validity.f90 (+5)
diff --git a/flang/lib/Semantics/check-acc-structure.cpp b/flang/lib/Semantics/check-acc-structure.cpp
index 623e31341a7c20..7afc285e7b9ae3 100644
--- a/flang/lib/Semantics/check-acc-structure.cpp
+++ b/flang/lib/Semantics/check-acc-structure.cpp
@@ -674,26 +674,28 @@ void AccStructureChecker::Enter(const parser::AccClause::Reduction &reduction) {
         common::visitors{
             [&](const parser::Designator &designator) {
               if (const auto *name = getDesignatorNameIfDataRef(designator)) {
-                const auto *type{name->symbol->GetType()};
-                if (type->IsNumeric(TypeCategory::Integer) &&
-                    !reductionIntegerSet.test(op.v)) {
-                  context_.Say(GetContext().clauseSource,
-                      "reduction operator not supported for integer type"_err_en_US);
-                } else if (type->IsNumeric(TypeCategory::Real) &&
-                    !reductionRealSet.test(op.v)) {
-                  context_.Say(GetContext().clauseSource,
-                      "reduction operator not supported for real type"_err_en_US);
-                } else if (type->IsNumeric(TypeCategory::Complex) &&
-                    !reductionComplexSet.test(op.v)) {
-                  context_.Say(GetContext().clauseSource,
-                      "reduction operator not supported for complex type"_err_en_US);
-                } else if (type->category() ==
-                        Fortran::semantics::DeclTypeSpec::Category::Logical &&
-                    !reductionLogicalSet.test(op.v)) {
-                  context_.Say(GetContext().clauseSource,
-                      "reduction operator not supported for logical type"_err_en_US);
+                if (name->symbol) {
+                  const auto *type{name->symbol->GetType()};
+                  if (type->IsNumeric(TypeCategory::Integer) &&
+                      !reductionIntegerSet.test(op.v)) {
+                    context_.Say(GetContext().clauseSource,
+                        "reduction operator not supported for integer type"_err_en_US);
+                  } else if (type->IsNumeric(TypeCategory::Real) &&
+                      !reductionRealSet.test(op.v)) {
+                    context_.Say(GetContext().clauseSource,
+                        "reduction operator not supported for real type"_err_en_US);
+                  } else if (type->IsNumeric(TypeCategory::Complex) &&
+                      !reductionComplexSet.test(op.v)) {
+                    context_.Say(GetContext().clauseSource,
+                        "reduction operator not supported for complex type"_err_en_US);
+                  } else if (type->category() ==
+                          Fortran::semantics::DeclTypeSpec::Category::Logical &&
+                      !reductionLogicalSet.test(op.v)) {
+                    context_.Say(GetContext().clauseSource,
+                        "reduction operator not supported for logical type"_err_en_US);
+                  }
+                  // TODO: check composite type.
                 }
-                // TODO: check composite type.
               }
             },
             [&](const Fortran::parser::Name &name) {
diff --git a/flang/test/Semantics/OpenACC/acc-reduction-validity.f90 b/flang/test/Semantics/OpenACC/acc-reduction-validity.f90
index ccd009bffa2e24..cecc7e0f507b25 100644
--- a/flang/test/Semantics/OpenACC/acc-reduction-validity.f90
+++ b/flang/test/Semantics/OpenACC/acc-reduction-validity.f90
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 ! Check OpenACC reduction validity.
 
 program openacc_reduction_validity
+  implicit none
 
   integer :: i
   real :: r
@@ -168,5 +169,9 @@ program openacc_reduction_validity
   !$acc parallel reduction(ieor:l)
   !$acc end parallel
 
+  !ERROR: No explicit type declared for 'xyz'
+  !$acc parallel reduction(+:xyz)
+  !$acc end parallel  
+
 
 end program

@razvanlupusoru
Copy link
Contributor

The commit message misspells the word "redutction". Otherwise, looks great.

@clementval clementval merged commit 7f64e8f into llvm:main Nov 4, 2024
12 checks passed
PhilippRados pushed a commit to PhilippRados/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
flang:semantics flang Flang issues not falling into any other category openacc
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants