-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[mlir][LLVM] Add exact flag #115327
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[mlir][LLVM] Add exact flag #115327
Conversation
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified. If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers. If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide. You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums. |
1028933
to
85ce594
Compare
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-llvm @llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir Author: None (lfrenot) ChangesThe implementation is mostly based on the one existing for the nsw and nuw flags. If the exact flag is present, the corresponding operation returns a poison value when the result is not exact. (For a division, if rounding happens; for a right shift, if a non-zero bit is shifted out.) @zero9178, @gysit and @Dinistro, could you take a look? Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115327.diff 8 Files Affected:
diff --git a/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/LLVMIR/LLVMInterfaces.td b/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/LLVMIR/LLVMInterfaces.td
index 7e38e0b27fd96b..12c430df208925 100644
--- a/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/LLVMIR/LLVMInterfaces.td
+++ b/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/LLVMIR/LLVMInterfaces.td
@@ -87,6 +87,33 @@ def IntegerOverflowFlagsInterface : OpInterface<"IntegerOverflowFlagsInterface">
];
}
+def ExactFlagInterface : OpInterface<"ExactFlagInterface"> {
+ let description = [{
+ This interface defines an LLVM operation with an exact flag and
+ provides a uniform API for accessing it.
+ }];
+
+ let cppNamespace = "::mlir::LLVM";
+
+ let methods = [
+ InterfaceMethod<[{
+ Get the exact flag for the operation.
+ }], "bool", "getIsExact", (ins), [{}], [{
+ return $_op.getProperties().isExact;
+ }]>,
+ InterfaceMethod<[{
+ Set the exact flag for the operation.
+ }], "void", "setIsExact", (ins "bool":$isExact), [{}], [{
+ $_op.getProperties().isExact = isExact;
+ }]>,
+ StaticInterfaceMethod<[{
+ Get the attribute name of the isExact property.
+ }], "StringRef", "getIsExactName", (ins), [{}], [{
+ return "isExact";
+ }]>,
+ ];
+}
+
def BranchWeightOpInterface : OpInterface<"BranchWeightOpInterface"> {
let description = [{
An interface for operations that can carry branch weights metadata. It
diff --git a/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/LLVMIR/LLVMOps.td b/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/LLVMIR/LLVMOps.td
index d5def510a904d3..b7ce126dbf54dd 100644
--- a/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/LLVMIR/LLVMOps.td
+++ b/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/LLVMIR/LLVMOps.td
@@ -76,6 +76,24 @@ class LLVM_IntArithmeticOpWithOverflowFlag<string mnemonic, string instName,
"$res = builder.Create" # instName #
"($lhs, $rhs, /*Name=*/\"\", op.hasNoUnsignedWrap(), op.hasNoSignedWrap());";
}
+class LLVM_IntArithmeticOpWithIsExact<string mnemonic, string instName,
+ list<Trait> traits = []> :
+ LLVM_ArithmeticOpBase<AnySignlessInteger, mnemonic, instName,
+ !listconcat([DeclareOpInterfaceMethods<ExactFlagInterface>], traits)> {
+ let arguments = !con(commonArgs, (ins UnitAttr:$isExact));
+
+ string mlirBuilder = [{
+ auto op = $_builder.create<$_qualCppClassName>($_location, $lhs, $rhs);
+ moduleImport.setExactFlag(inst, op);
+ $res = op;
+ }];
+ let assemblyFormat = [{
+ (`exact` $isExact^)? $lhs `,` $rhs custom<LLVMOpAttrs>(attr-dict) `:` type($res)
+ }];
+ string llvmBuilder =
+ "$res = builder.Create" # instName #
+ "($lhs, $rhs, /*Name=*/\"\", op.getIsExact());";
+}
class LLVM_FloatArithmeticOp<string mnemonic, string instName,
list<Trait> traits = []> :
LLVM_ArithmeticOpBase<LLVM_AnyFloat, mnemonic, instName,
@@ -116,8 +134,8 @@ def LLVM_AddOp : LLVM_IntArithmeticOpWithOverflowFlag<"add", "Add",
def LLVM_SubOp : LLVM_IntArithmeticOpWithOverflowFlag<"sub", "Sub", []>;
def LLVM_MulOp : LLVM_IntArithmeticOpWithOverflowFlag<"mul", "Mul",
[Commutative]>;
-def LLVM_UDivOp : LLVM_IntArithmeticOp<"udiv", "UDiv">;
-def LLVM_SDivOp : LLVM_IntArithmeticOp<"sdiv", "SDiv">;
+def LLVM_UDivOp : LLVM_IntArithmeticOpWithIsExact<"udiv", "UDiv">;
+def LLVM_SDivOp : LLVM_IntArithmeticOpWithIsExact<"sdiv", "SDiv">;
def LLVM_URemOp : LLVM_IntArithmeticOp<"urem", "URem">;
def LLVM_SRemOp : LLVM_IntArithmeticOp<"srem", "SRem">;
def LLVM_AndOp : LLVM_IntArithmeticOp<"and", "And">;
@@ -128,8 +146,8 @@ def LLVM_XOrOp : LLVM_IntArithmeticOp<"xor", "Xor">;
def LLVM_ShlOp : LLVM_IntArithmeticOpWithOverflowFlag<"shl", "Shl", []> {
let hasFolder = 1;
}
-def LLVM_LShrOp : LLVM_IntArithmeticOp<"lshr", "LShr">;
-def LLVM_AShrOp : LLVM_IntArithmeticOp<"ashr", "AShr">;
+def LLVM_LShrOp : LLVM_IntArithmeticOpWithIsExact<"lshr", "LShr">;
+def LLVM_AShrOp : LLVM_IntArithmeticOpWithIsExact<"ashr", "AShr">;
// Base class for compare operations. A compare operation takes two operands
// of the same type and returns a boolean result. If the operands are
diff --git a/mlir/include/mlir/Target/LLVMIR/ModuleImport.h b/mlir/include/mlir/Target/LLVMIR/ModuleImport.h
index bbb7af58d27393..6c3a500f20e3a9 100644
--- a/mlir/include/mlir/Target/LLVMIR/ModuleImport.h
+++ b/mlir/include/mlir/Target/LLVMIR/ModuleImport.h
@@ -187,6 +187,11 @@ class ModuleImport {
/// operation does not implement the integer overflow flag interface.
void setIntegerOverflowFlags(llvm::Instruction *inst, Operation *op) const;
+ /// Sets the exact flag attribute for the imported operation `op` given
+ /// the original instruction `inst`. Asserts if the operation does not
+ /// implement the exact flag interface.
+ void setExactFlag(llvm::Instruction *inst, Operation *op) const;
+
/// Sets the fastmath flags attribute for the imported operation `op` given
/// the original instruction `inst`. Asserts if the operation does not
/// implement the fastmath interface.
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Dialect/LLVMIR/IR/LLVMDialect.cpp b/mlir/lib/Dialect/LLVMIR/IR/LLVMDialect.cpp
index c9bc9533ca2a6b..6b2d8943bf4885 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Dialect/LLVMIR/IR/LLVMDialect.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Dialect/LLVMIR/IR/LLVMDialect.cpp
@@ -143,6 +143,9 @@ static void printLLVMOpAttrs(OpAsmPrinter &printer, Operation *op,
if (auto iface = dyn_cast<IntegerOverflowFlagsInterface>(op)) {
printer.printOptionalAttrDict(
filteredAttrs, /*elidedAttrs=*/{iface.getOverflowFlagsAttrName()});
+ } else if (auto iface = dyn_cast<ExactFlagInterface>(op)) {
+ printer.printOptionalAttrDict(filteredAttrs,
+ /*elidedAttrs=*/{iface.getIsExactName()});
} else {
printer.printOptionalAttrDict(filteredAttrs);
}
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Target/LLVMIR/ModuleImport.cpp b/mlir/lib/Target/LLVMIR/ModuleImport.cpp
index 1f63519373ecab..ccec2034a298b2 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Target/LLVMIR/ModuleImport.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Target/LLVMIR/ModuleImport.cpp
@@ -683,6 +683,14 @@ void ModuleImport::setIntegerOverflowFlags(llvm::Instruction *inst,
iface.setOverflowFlags(value);
}
+void ModuleImport::setExactFlag(llvm::Instruction *inst, Operation *op) const {
+ auto iface = cast<ExactFlagInterface>(op);
+
+ bool value = inst->isExact();
+
+ iface.setIsExact(value);
+}
+
void ModuleImport::setFastmathFlagsAttr(llvm::Instruction *inst,
Operation *op) const {
auto iface = cast<FastmathFlagsInterface>(op);
diff --git a/mlir/test/Dialect/LLVMIR/roundtrip.mlir b/mlir/test/Dialect/LLVMIR/roundtrip.mlir
index b8ce7db795a1d1..9daad2ef5b0b1b 100644
--- a/mlir/test/Dialect/LLVMIR/roundtrip.mlir
+++ b/mlir/test/Dialect/LLVMIR/roundtrip.mlir
@@ -49,6 +49,16 @@ func.func @ops(%arg0: i32, %arg1: f32,
%mul_flag = llvm.mul %arg0, %arg0 overflow<nsw, nuw> : i32
%shl_flag = llvm.shl %arg0, %arg0 overflow<nuw, nsw> : i32
+// Integer exact
+// CHECK: {{.*}} = llvm.sdiv exact %[[I32]], %[[I32]] : i32
+// CHECK: {{.*}} = llvm.udiv exact %[[I32]], %[[I32]] : i32
+// CHECK: {{.*}} = llvm.ashr exact %[[I32]], %[[I32]] : i32
+// CHECK: {{.*}} = llvm.lshr exact %[[I32]], %[[I32]] : i32
+ %sdiv_flag = llvm.sdiv exact %arg0, %arg0 : i32
+ %udiv_flag = llvm.udiv exact %arg0, %arg0 : i32
+ %ashr_flag = llvm.ashr exact %arg0, %arg0 : i32
+ %lshr_flag = llvm.lshr exact %arg0, %arg0 : i32
+
// Floating point binary operations.
//
// CHECK: {{.*}} = llvm.fadd %[[FLOAT]], %[[FLOAT]] : f32
diff --git a/mlir/test/Target/LLVMIR/Import/exact.ll b/mlir/test/Target/LLVMIR/Import/exact.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..528fee5091d2da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mlir/test/Target/LLVMIR/Import/exact.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+; RUN: mlir-translate -import-llvm -split-input-file %s | FileCheck %s
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: @exactflag_inst
+define void @exactflag_inst(i64 %arg1, i64 %arg2) {
+ ; CHECK: llvm.udiv exact %{{.*}}, %{{.*}} : i64
+ %1 = udiv exact i64 %arg1, %arg2
+ ; CHECK: llvm.sdiv exact %{{.*}}, %{{.*}} : i64
+ %2 = sdiv exact i64 %arg1, %arg2
+ ; CHECK: llvm.lshr exact %{{.*}}, %{{.*}} : i64
+ %3 = lshr exact i64 %arg1, %arg2
+ ; CHECK: llvm.ashr exact %{{.*}}, %{{.*}} : i64
+ %4 = ashr exact i64 %arg1, %arg2
+ ret void
+}
diff --git a/mlir/test/Target/LLVMIR/exact.mlir b/mlir/test/Target/LLVMIR/exact.mlir
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..b6c378c2fdcc94
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mlir/test/Target/LLVMIR/exact.mlir
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// RUN: mlir-translate -mlir-to-llvmir %s | FileCheck %s
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: define void @exactflag_func
+llvm.func @exactflag_func(%arg0: i64, %arg1: i64) {
+ // CHECK: %{{.*}} = udiv exact i64 %{{.*}}, %{{.*}}
+ %0 = llvm.udiv exact %arg0, %arg1 : i64
+ // CHECK: %{{.*}} = sdiv exact i64 %{{.*}}, %{{.*}}
+ %1 = llvm.sdiv exact %arg0, %arg1 : i64
+ // CHECK: %{{.*}} = lshr exact i64 %{{.*}}, %{{.*}}
+ %2 = llvm.lshr exact %arg0, %arg1 : i64
+ // CHECK: %{{.*}} = ashr exact i64 %{{.*}}, %{{.*}}
+ %3 = llvm.ashr exact %arg0, %arg1 : i64
+ llvm.return
+}
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for this contribution 🙂
Very nice work, LGTM % a small nit comment.
bool value = inst->isExact(); | ||
|
||
iface.setIsExact(value); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
bool value = inst->isExact(); | |
iface.setIsExact(value); | |
iface.setIsExact(inst->isExact()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for adding the flag!
LGTM modulo nits.
@@ -76,6 +76,24 @@ class LLVM_IntArithmeticOpWithOverflowFlag<string mnemonic, string instName, | |||
"$res = builder.Create" # instName # | |||
"($lhs, $rhs, /*Name=*/\"\", op.hasNoUnsignedWrap(), op.hasNoSignedWrap());"; | |||
} | |||
class LLVM_IntArithmeticOpWithIsExact<string mnemonic, string instName, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
class LLVM_IntArithmeticOpWithIsExact<string mnemonic, string instName, | |
class LLVM_IntArithmeticOpWithExactFlag<string mnemonic, string instName, |
nit: Should we use ExactFlag to follow the naming of LLVM_IntArithmeticOpWithIsExact?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done!
@@ -49,6 +49,16 @@ func.func @ops(%arg0: i32, %arg1: f32, | |||
%mul_flag = llvm.mul %arg0, %arg0 overflow<nsw, nuw> : i32 | |||
%shl_flag = llvm.shl %arg0, %arg0 overflow<nuw, nsw> : i32 | |||
|
|||
// Integer exact |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
// Integer exact | |
// Integer exact flag. |
ultra nit:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done!
This changes the representation of the exact attribute from a mandatory bool to an optional Unit. This is to follow the syntax introduced by llvm/llvm-project#115327
If everything is fixed, is it possible for someone with write access to merge the PR? |
@lfrenot Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project! Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested by our build bots. If there is a problem with a build, you may receive a report in an email or a comment on this PR. Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as the builds can include changes from many authors. It is not uncommon for your change to be included in a build that fails due to someone else's changes, or infrastructure issues. How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here. If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. This is a normal part of LLVM development. You can fix your changes and open a new PR to merge them again. If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done! |
The implementation is mostly based on the one existing for the nsw and nuw flags. If the exact flag is present, the corresponding operation returns a poison value when the result is not exact. (For a division, if rounding happens; for a right shift, if a non-zero bit is shifted out.)
…ct#3408) This changes the representation of the exact attribute from a mandatory bool to an optional Unit. This is to follow the syntax introduced by llvm/llvm-project#115327
The implementation is mostly based on the one existing for the nsw and nuw flags.
If the exact flag is present, the corresponding operation returns a poison value when the result is not exact. (For a division, if rounding happens; for a right shift, if a non-zero bit is shifted out.)
@zero9178, @gysit and @Dinistro, could you take a look?