[GISel][AArch64][RISCV] Don't call markAllIdxsAsCovered from minScalarSameAs/maxScalarSameAs. #115637
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…rSameAs/maxScalarSameAs. The predicate isn't user defined so we don't need to call markAllIdxsAsCovered. Call actionIf instead of widenScalarIf/narrowScalarIf.
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-globalisel @llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64 Author: Craig Topper (topperc) ChangesThe predicate isn't user defined so we don't need to call markAllIdxsAsCovered. Call actionIf instead of widenScalarIf/narrowScalarIf. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115637.diff 3 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizerInfo.h b/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizerInfo.h
index b737917b8442da..007f62b9b05b92 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizerInfo.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizerInfo.h
@@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ class LegalizeRuleSet {
/// Widen the scalar to match the size of another.
LegalizeRuleSet &minScalarSameAs(unsigned TypeIdx, unsigned LargeTypeIdx) {
typeIdx(TypeIdx);
- return widenScalarIf(
+ return actionIf(LegalizeAction::WidenScalar,
[=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
return Query.Types[LargeTypeIdx].getScalarSizeInBits() >
Query.Types[TypeIdx].getSizeInBits();
@@ -1129,7 +1129,7 @@ class LegalizeRuleSet {
/// Narrow the scalar to match the size of another.
LegalizeRuleSet &maxScalarSameAs(unsigned TypeIdx, unsigned NarrowTypeIdx) {
typeIdx(TypeIdx);
- return narrowScalarIf(
+ return actionIf(LegalizeAction::NarrowScalar,
[=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
return Query.Types[NarrowTypeIdx].getScalarSizeInBits() <
Query.Types[TypeIdx].getSizeInBits();
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/GlobalISel/legalizer-info-validation.mir b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/GlobalISel/legalizer-info-validation.mir
index 6be99d0088f1cb..4b10dc45f86d76 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/GlobalISel/legalizer-info-validation.mir
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/GlobalISel/legalizer-info-validation.mir
@@ -111,8 +111,8 @@
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. imm index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
#
# DEBUG-NEXT: G_BUILD_VECTOR (opcode {{[0-9]+}}): 2 type indices, 0 imm indices
-# DEBUG-NEXT: .. type index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
-# DEBUG-NEXT: .. imm index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
+# DEBUG-NEXT: .. the first uncovered type index: 2, OK
+# DEBUG-NEXT: .. the first uncovered imm index: 0, OK
#
# DEBUG-NEXT: G_BUILD_VECTOR_TRUNC (opcode {{[0-9]+}}): 2 type indices, 0 imm indices
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. type index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
@@ -675,8 +675,8 @@
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. type index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. imm index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
# DEBUG-NEXT: G_CTLZ (opcode {{[0-9]+}}): 2 type indices, 0 imm indices
-# DEBUG-NEXT: .. type index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
-# DEBUG-NEXT: .. imm index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
+# DEBUG-NEXT: .. the first uncovered type index: 2, OK
+# DEBUG-NEXT: .. the first uncovered imm index: 0, OK
# DEBUG-NEXT: G_CTLZ_ZERO_UNDEF (opcode {{[0-9]+}}): 2 type indices, 0 imm indices
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. type index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. imm index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/GlobalISel/legalizer-info-validation.mir b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/GlobalISel/legalizer-info-validation.mir
index b611442eb9ba4e..746a3de4cf79a6 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/GlobalISel/legalizer-info-validation.mir
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/GlobalISel/legalizer-info-validation.mir
@@ -326,16 +326,16 @@
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. type index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. imm index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
# DEBUG-NEXT: G_SHL (opcode {{[0-9]+}}): 2 type indices, 0 imm indices
-# DEBUG-NEXT: .. type index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
-# DEBUG-NEXT: .. imm index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
+# DEBUG-NEXT: .. the first uncovered type index: 2, OK
+# DEBUG-NEXT: .. the first uncovered imm index: 0, OK
# DEBUG-NEXT: G_LSHR (opcode {{[0-9]+}}): 2 type indices, 0 imm indices
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. opcode {{[0-9]+}} is aliased to {{[0-9]+}}
-# DEBUG-NEXT: .. type index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
-# DEBUG-NEXT: .. imm index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
+# DEBUG-NEXT: .. the first uncovered type index: 2, OK
+# DEBUG-NEXT: .. the first uncovered imm index: 0, OK
# DEBUG-NEXT: G_ASHR (opcode {{[0-9]+}}): 2 type indices, 0 imm indices
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. opcode {{[0-9]+}} is aliased to {{[0-9]+}}
-# DEBUG-NEXT: .. type index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
-# DEBUG-NEXT: .. imm index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
+# DEBUG-NEXT: .. the first uncovered type index: 2, OK
+# DEBUG-NEXT: .. the first uncovered imm index: 0, OK
# DEBUG-NEXT: G_FSHL (opcode {{[0-9]+}}): 2 type indices, 0 imm indices
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. type index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. imm index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
@@ -651,21 +651,21 @@
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. imm index coverage check SKIPPED: no rules defined
# DEBUG-NEXT: G_CTTZ (opcode {{[0-9]+}}): 2 type indices, 0 imm indices
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. opcode {{[0-9]+}} is aliased to {{[0-9]+}}
-# DEBUG-NEXT: .. type index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
-# DEBUG-NEXT: .. imm index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
+# DEBUG-NEXT: .. the first uncovered type index: 2, OK
+# DEBUG-NEXT: .. the first uncovered imm index: 0, OK
# DEBUG-NEXT: G_CTTZ_ZERO_UNDEF (opcode {{[0-9]+}}): 2 type indices, 0 imm indices
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. opcode {{[0-9]+}} is aliased to {{[0-9]+}}
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. type index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. imm index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
# DEBUG-NEXT: G_CTLZ (opcode {{[0-9]+}}): 2 type indices, 0 imm indices
-# DEBUG-NEXT: .. type index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
-# DEBUG-NEXT: .. imm index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
+# DEBUG-NEXT: .. the first uncovered type index: 2, OK
+# DEBUG-NEXT: .. the first uncovered imm index: 0, OK
# DEBUG-NEXT: G_CTLZ_ZERO_UNDEF (opcode {{[0-9]+}}): 2 type indices, 0 imm indices
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. type index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. imm index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
# DEBUG-NEXT: G_CTPOP (opcode {{[0-9]+}}): 2 type indices, 0 imm indices
-# DEBUG-NEXT: .. type index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
-# DEBUG-NEXT: .. imm index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate detected
+# DEBUG-NEXT: .. the first uncovered type index: 2, OK
+# DEBUG-NEXT: .. the first uncovered imm index: 0, OK
# DEBUG-NEXT: G_BSWAP (opcode {{[0-9]+}}): 1 type index, 0 imm indices
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. the first uncovered type index: 1, OK
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. the first uncovered imm index: 0, OK
|
|
✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter. |
tschuett
reviewed
Nov 10, 2024
lenary
approved these changes
Nov 11, 2024
|
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/136/builds/1588 Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference |
Groverkss
pushed a commit
to iree-org/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2024
…rSameAs/maxScalarSameAs. (llvm#115637) The predicate isn't user defined so we don't need to call markAllIdxsAsCovered. Call actionIf instead of widenScalarIf/narrowScalarIf.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The predicate isn't user defined so we don't need to call markAllIdxsAsCovered. Call actionIf instead of widenScalarIf/narrowScalarIf.