-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[clang][NFC] add release note for n3030 support #115648
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: None (h-vetinari) ChangesFollow-up to #107260 CC @Fznamznon @AaronBallman Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115648.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index c3424e0e6f34c9..6953a4e320ca92 100644
--- a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ C2y Feature Support
which adds the ``i`` and ``j`` suffixes for the creation of a ``_Complex``
constant value. Clang has always supported these suffixes as a GNU extension,
so ``-Wgnu-imaginary-constant`` no longer has effect in C modes, as this is
- not a C2y extension in C. ``-Wgnu-imaginary-constant`` still applies in C++
+ now a C2y extension in C. ``-Wgnu-imaginary-constant`` still applies in C++
modes.
- Clang updated conformance for `N3370 <https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3370.htm>`_
@@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ C23 Feature Support
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- Clang now supports `N3029 <https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3029.htm>`_ Improved Normal Enumerations.
+- Clang now supports `N3030 <https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3030.htm>`_ Enhancements to Enumerations.
Non-comprehensive list of changes in this release
-------------------------------------------------
|
Co-authored-by: Mariya Podchishchaeva <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM and thanks for the drive-by typo fix. :-)
Thanks for the reviews! I don't have the commit bit, so would rely on someone pushing the button. :) |
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/78/builds/9487 Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference
|
Follow-up to #107260
CC @Fznamznon @AaronBallman