-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[clang][driver] When -fveclib=ArmPL flag is in use, always link against libamath #116432
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why -m -lamath -lm ?
if there is circular dependency, the conventional way is --start-group -lamth -lm --end-group
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No no, it isn't simply a dependency. It's a matter of prioritizing system-libm over libamath which contains faster (and potentially less accurate) implementations of some of the libm functions. I was advised, these should not be used in normal circumstances (it is just unfortunate that for historical reasons, this veclib provider isn't just veclib provider; but for -fveclib=ArmPL there is no other, and likely there will be no other). From the other side, some of the libamath-only functions depend on libm functions that are not in libamath. Is it certain that start/end-group algorithm would look into libraries in-order preferring library first to provide looked upon symbol (e.g. when given
--start-group -lm -lamath --end-group
)? Besides, Darwin's default ld doesn't seem to support --start-group.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@MaskRay is this response sufficient?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If "It's a matter of prioritizing system-libm over libamath which contains faster (and potentially less accurate) implementations of some of the libm functions.", the comment above doesn't seem to mention this.
However, I am confused. Why cannot these duplicate symbols be removed from libamath so that the compiler driver doesn't have to play with circular -lm and -lamath dependency?
If the reason is that we want to support both old libm and new libm where libm contains faster implementations also in libamath, I expect this reasoning to be covered.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now it mentions.
This is purely historical reason. Libamath was meant to be libm replacement, being veclib provider for fveclib=ArmPL is just one more role of this lib. The user still needs to be able to specify
-lamath
to be able to choose those less accurate faster functions, and I've made this covered by now added extra checks in the test cases.