-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
release/19.x: [LICM] allow MemoryAccess creation failure (#116813) #117082
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@nikic What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch? |
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms @llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-analysis Author: None (llvmbot) ChangesBackport 18b02bb Requested by: @DianQK Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117082.diff 4 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.h b/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.h
index d4da3ef1146db7..055feceefb0546 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.h
@@ -190,7 +190,8 @@ class MemorySSAUpdater {
/// inaccessible and it *must* have removeMemoryAccess called on it.
MemoryAccess *createMemoryAccessInBB(Instruction *I, MemoryAccess *Definition,
const BasicBlock *BB,
- MemorySSA::InsertionPlace Point);
+ MemorySSA::InsertionPlace Point,
+ bool CreationMustSucceed = true);
/// Create a MemoryAccess in MemorySSA before an existing MemoryAccess.
///
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.cpp
index aa550f0b6a7bfd..f672bd0e1e133e 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.cpp
@@ -1403,9 +1403,11 @@ void MemorySSAUpdater::changeToUnreachable(const Instruction *I) {
MemoryAccess *MemorySSAUpdater::createMemoryAccessInBB(
Instruction *I, MemoryAccess *Definition, const BasicBlock *BB,
- MemorySSA::InsertionPlace Point) {
- MemoryUseOrDef *NewAccess = MSSA->createDefinedAccess(I, Definition);
- MSSA->insertIntoListsForBlock(NewAccess, BB, Point);
+ MemorySSA::InsertionPlace Point, bool CreationMustSucceed) {
+ MemoryUseOrDef *NewAccess = MSSA->createDefinedAccess(
+ I, Definition, /*Template=*/nullptr, CreationMustSucceed);
+ if (NewAccess)
+ MSSA->insertIntoListsForBlock(NewAccess, BB, Point);
return NewAccess;
}
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp
index 91ef2b4b7c1839..ca03eff7a4e25f 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp
@@ -1464,8 +1464,11 @@ static Instruction *cloneInstructionInExitBlock(
if (MSSAU.getMemorySSA()->getMemoryAccess(&I)) {
// Create a new MemoryAccess and let MemorySSA set its defining access.
+ // After running some passes, MemorySSA might be outdated, and the
+ // instruction `I` may have become a non-memory touching instruction.
MemoryAccess *NewMemAcc = MSSAU.createMemoryAccessInBB(
- New, nullptr, New->getParent(), MemorySSA::Beginning);
+ New, nullptr, New->getParent(), MemorySSA::Beginning,
+ /*CreationMustSucceed=*/false);
if (NewMemAcc) {
if (auto *MemDef = dyn_cast<MemoryDef>(NewMemAcc))
MSSAU.insertDef(MemDef, /*RenameUses=*/true);
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/LICM/PR116813-memoryssa-outdated.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/LICM/PR116813-memoryssa-outdated.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..a040c3cc6947c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/LICM/PR116813-memoryssa-outdated.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: opt -passes='loop-mssa(simple-loop-unswitch<nontrivial>,licm)' -verify-memoryssa -S < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+; Check that running LICM after SimpleLoopUnswitch does not result in a crash.
+
+define i32 @foo(i1 %arg, ptr %arg1) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: define i32 @foo(
+; CHECK-SAME: i1 [[ARG:%.*]], ptr [[ARG1:%.*]]) {
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[START:.*:]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[ARG_FR:%.*]] = freeze i1 [[ARG]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[ARG_FR]], label %[[START_SPLIT_US:.*]], label %[[START_SPLIT:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[START_SPLIT_US]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[LOOP_US:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[LOOP_US]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[BB0:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[BB0]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[BB1:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[BB1]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[UNSWITCHED_SELECT_US:%.*]] = phi ptr [ [[ARG1]], %[[BB0]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[I3_US:%.*]] = call i32 [[UNSWITCHED_SELECT_US]]()
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 true, label %[[LOOP_US]], label %[[RET_SPLIT_US:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[RET_SPLIT_US]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[I3_LCSSA_US:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[I3_US]], %[[BB1]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[RET:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[START_SPLIT]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[LOOP:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[LOOP]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[BB2:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[BB2]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 false, label %[[LOOP]], label %[[RET_SPLIT:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[RET_SPLIT]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[I3_LE:%.*]] = call i32 @bar()
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[RET]]
+; CHECK: [[RET]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[DOTUS_PHI:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[I3_LE]], %[[RET_SPLIT]] ], [ [[I3_LCSSA_US]], %[[RET_SPLIT_US]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[DOTUS_PHI]]
+;
+start:
+ br label %loop
+
+loop: ; preds = %loop, %bb
+ %i = select i1 %arg, ptr %arg1, ptr @bar
+ %i3 = call i32 %i()
+ br i1 %arg, label %loop, label %ret
+
+ret: ; preds = %loop
+ ret i32 %i3
+}
+
+declare i32 @bar() nounwind willreturn memory(none)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Fixes llvm#116809. After running some passes (SimpleLoopUnswitch, LoopInstSimplify, etc.), MemorySSA might be outdated, and the instruction `I` may have become a non-memory touching instruction. LICM has already handled this, but it does not pass `CreationMustSucceed=false` to `createDefinedAccess`. (cherry picked from commit 18b02bb)
@dianqk (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the release:note label to this PR. |
Backport 18b02bb
Requested by: @dianqk