-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
Enhance RISCV machine outlining to support a tailcall strategy. #117526
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This is modeled on the equivalent path in the AArch64 backend. Whenever the outlining candidate ends in a terminator, we can use a tail call to reach it, removing the need to use a link register or to insert a return instruction in the outlined function. This improves code size in a size-optimized build of an internal benchmark by approximately 3%.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v Author: Owen Anderson (resistor) ChangesThis is modeled on the equivalent path in the AArch64 backend. This improves code size in a size-optimized build of an internal Patch is 26.69 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117526.diff 7 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInstrInfo.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInstrInfo.cpp
index 933e776da47404..33d1d47a89d65f 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInstrInfo.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInstrInfo.cpp
@@ -2925,9 +2925,42 @@ bool RISCVInstrInfo::isMBBSafeToOutlineFrom(MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
return TargetInstrInfo::isMBBSafeToOutlineFrom(MBB, Flags);
}
-// Enum values indicating how an outlined call should be constructed.
+/// Constants defining how certain sequences should be outlined.
+/// This encompasses how an outlined function should be called, and what kind of
+/// frame should be emitted for that outlined function.
+///
+/// \p MachineOutlinerCallViaX5 implies that the function should be called with
+/// using X5 as an alternative link register.
+///
+/// That is,
+///
+/// I1 Materialize addr in X5 OUTLINED_FUNCTION:
+/// I2 --> JAL X5 I1
+/// I3 I2
+/// I3
+/// RET X5
+///
+/// * Call construction overhead: 2 insns
+/// * Frame construction overhead: 1 (ret)
+/// * Requires stack fixups? No
+///
+/// \p MachineOutlinerTailCall implies that the function is being created from
+/// a sequence of instructions ending in a return.
+///
+/// That is,
+///
+/// I1 OUTLINED_FUNCTION:
+/// I2 --> B OUTLINED_FUNCTION I1
+/// RET I2
+/// RET
+///
+/// * Call construction overhead: 2 insns
+/// * Frame construction overhead: 0 (Return included in sequence)
+/// * Requires stack fixups? No
+///
enum MachineOutlinerConstructionID {
- MachineOutlinerDefault
+ MachineOutlinerCallViaX5,
+ MachineOutlinerTailCall
};
bool RISCVInstrInfo::shouldOutlineFromFunctionByDefault(
@@ -2941,14 +2974,33 @@ RISCVInstrInfo::getOutliningCandidateInfo(
std::vector<outliner::Candidate> &RepeatedSequenceLocs,
unsigned MinRepeats) const {
- // First we need to filter out candidates where the X5 register (IE t0) can't
- // be used to setup the function call.
- auto CannotInsertCall = [](outliner::Candidate &C) {
- const TargetRegisterInfo *TRI = C.getMF()->getSubtarget().getRegisterInfo();
- return !C.isAvailableAcrossAndOutOfSeq(RISCV::X5, *TRI);
- };
+ // If the last instruction in any candidate is a terminator, then we should
+ // tail call all of the candidates.
+ bool IsTailCall = RepeatedSequenceLocs[0].back().isTerminator();
+
+ if (!IsTailCall) {
+ // Filter out candidates where the X5 register (IE t0) can't
+ // be used to setup the function call.
+ auto CannotInsertCall = [](outliner::Candidate &C) {
+ const TargetRegisterInfo *TRI =
+ C.getMF()->getSubtarget().getRegisterInfo();
+ if (!C.isAvailableAcrossAndOutOfSeq(RISCV::X5, *TRI))
+ return true;
- llvm::erase_if(RepeatedSequenceLocs, CannotInsertCall);
+ // Don't allow modifying the X5 register which we use for return addresses
+ // for these outlined functions.
+ for (const auto &MI : C) {
+ // FIXME: Why is this case not handled by isAvailableAcrossAndOutOfSeq
+ // above?
+ if (MI.modifiesRegister(RISCV::X5, TRI))
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+ };
+
+ llvm::erase_if(RepeatedSequenceLocs, CannotInsertCall);
+ }
// If the sequence doesn't have enough candidates left, then we're done.
if (RepeatedSequenceLocs.size() < MinRepeats)
@@ -2961,8 +3013,12 @@ RISCVInstrInfo::getOutliningCandidateInfo(
// call t0, function = 8 bytes.
unsigned CallOverhead = 8;
+
+ MachineOutlinerConstructionID OutlinerType =
+ IsTailCall ? MachineOutlinerTailCall : MachineOutlinerCallViaX5;
+
for (auto &C : RepeatedSequenceLocs)
- C.setCallInfo(MachineOutlinerDefault, CallOverhead);
+ C.setCallInfo(OutlinerType, CallOverhead);
// jr t0 = 4 bytes, 2 bytes if compressed instructions are enabled.
unsigned FrameOverhead = 4;
@@ -2972,9 +3028,12 @@ RISCVInstrInfo::getOutliningCandidateInfo(
.hasStdExtCOrZca())
FrameOverhead = 2;
+ // There is no overhead in the frame when doing a tail call.
+ if (IsTailCall)
+ FrameOverhead = 0;
+
return std::make_unique<outliner::OutlinedFunction>(
- RepeatedSequenceLocs, SequenceSize, FrameOverhead,
- MachineOutlinerDefault);
+ RepeatedSequenceLocs, SequenceSize, FrameOverhead, OutlinerType);
}
outliner::InstrType
@@ -2982,9 +3041,6 @@ RISCVInstrInfo::getOutliningTypeImpl(const MachineModuleInfo &MMI,
MachineBasicBlock::iterator &MBBI,
unsigned Flags) const {
MachineInstr &MI = *MBBI;
- MachineBasicBlock *MBB = MI.getParent();
- const TargetRegisterInfo *TRI =
- MBB->getParent()->getSubtarget().getRegisterInfo();
const auto &F = MI.getMF()->getFunction();
// We can manually strip out CFI instructions later.
@@ -2995,17 +3051,6 @@ RISCVInstrInfo::getOutliningTypeImpl(const MachineModuleInfo &MMI,
return F.needsUnwindTableEntry() ? outliner::InstrType::Illegal
: outliner::InstrType::Invisible;
- // We need support for tail calls to outlined functions before return
- // statements can be allowed.
- if (MI.isReturn())
- return outliner::InstrType::Illegal;
-
- // Don't allow modifying the X5 register which we use for return addresses for
- // these outlined functions.
- if (MI.modifiesRegister(RISCV::X5, TRI) ||
- MI.getDesc().hasImplicitDefOfPhysReg(RISCV::X5))
- return outliner::InstrType::Illegal;
-
// Make sure the operands don't reference something unsafe.
for (const auto &MO : MI.operands()) {
@@ -3041,6 +3086,9 @@ void RISCVInstrInfo::buildOutlinedFrame(
MBB.addLiveIn(RISCV::X5);
+ if (OF.FrameConstructionID == MachineOutlinerTailCall)
+ return;
+
// Add in a return instruction to the end of the outlined frame.
MBB.insert(MBB.end(), BuildMI(MF, DebugLoc(), get(RISCV::JALR))
.addReg(RISCV::X0, RegState::Define)
@@ -3052,6 +3100,13 @@ MachineBasicBlock::iterator RISCVInstrInfo::insertOutlinedCall(
Module &M, MachineBasicBlock &MBB, MachineBasicBlock::iterator &It,
MachineFunction &MF, outliner::Candidate &C) const {
+ if (C.CallConstructionID == MachineOutlinerTailCall) {
+ It = MBB.insert(It, BuildMI(MF, DebugLoc(), get(RISCV::PseudoTAIL))
+ .addGlobalAddress(M.getNamedValue(MF.getName()), 0,
+ RISCVII::MO_CALL));
+ return It;
+ }
+
// Add in a call instruction to the outlined function at the given location.
It = MBB.insert(It,
BuildMI(MF, DebugLoc(), get(RISCV::PseudoCALLReg), RISCV::X5)
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/machine-outliner-cfi.mir b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/machine-outliner-cfi.mir
index 6ecca6a1b18ef8..3aca71643ecd72 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/machine-outliner-cfi.mir
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/machine-outliner-cfi.mir
@@ -22,13 +22,11 @@ body: |
; RV32I-MO-LABEL: name: func1
; RV32I-MO: liveins: $x10, $x11
; RV32I-MO-NEXT: {{ $}}
- ; RV32I-MO-NEXT: $x5 = PseudoCALLReg target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit-def $x5, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
- ; RV32I-MO-NEXT: PseudoRET
+ ; RV32I-MO-NEXT: PseudoTAIL target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit $x2, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x2, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
; RV64I-MO-LABEL: name: func1
; RV64I-MO: liveins: $x10, $x11
; RV64I-MO-NEXT: {{ $}}
- ; RV64I-MO-NEXT: $x5 = PseudoCALLReg target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit-def $x5, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
- ; RV64I-MO-NEXT: PseudoRET
+ ; RV64I-MO-NEXT: PseudoTAIL target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit $x2, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x2, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
$x10 = ORI $x10, 1023
CFI_INSTRUCTION offset $x1, 0
$x11 = ORI $x11, 1023
@@ -49,13 +47,11 @@ body: |
; RV32I-MO-LABEL: name: func2
; RV32I-MO: liveins: $x10, $x11
; RV32I-MO-NEXT: {{ $}}
- ; RV32I-MO-NEXT: $x5 = PseudoCALLReg target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit-def $x5, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
- ; RV32I-MO-NEXT: PseudoRET
+ ; RV32I-MO-NEXT: PseudoTAIL target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit $x2, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x2, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
; RV64I-MO-LABEL: name: func2
; RV64I-MO: liveins: $x10, $x11
; RV64I-MO-NEXT: {{ $}}
- ; RV64I-MO-NEXT: $x5 = PseudoCALLReg target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit-def $x5, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
- ; RV64I-MO-NEXT: PseudoRET
+ ; RV64I-MO-NEXT: PseudoTAIL target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit $x2, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x2, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
$x10 = ORI $x10, 1023
CFI_INSTRUCTION offset $x1, 0
$x11 = ORI $x11, 1023
@@ -76,13 +72,11 @@ body: |
; RV32I-MO-LABEL: name: func3
; RV32I-MO: liveins: $x10, $x11
; RV32I-MO-NEXT: {{ $}}
- ; RV32I-MO-NEXT: $x5 = PseudoCALLReg target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit-def $x5, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
- ; RV32I-MO-NEXT: PseudoRET
+ ; RV32I-MO-NEXT: PseudoTAIL target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit $x2, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x2, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
; RV64I-MO-LABEL: name: func3
; RV64I-MO: liveins: $x10, $x11
; RV64I-MO-NEXT: {{ $}}
- ; RV64I-MO-NEXT: $x5 = PseudoCALLReg target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit-def $x5, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
- ; RV64I-MO-NEXT: PseudoRET
+ ; RV64I-MO-NEXT: PseudoTAIL target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit $x2, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x2, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
$x10 = ORI $x10, 1023
CFI_INSTRUCTION offset $x1, -12
$x11 = ORI $x11, 1023
@@ -103,4 +97,4 @@ body: |
# OUTLINED-NEXT: $x12 = ADDI $x10, 17
# OUTLINED-NEXT: $x11 = AND $x12, $x11
# OUTLINED-NEXT: $x10 = SUB $x10, $x11
-# OUTLINED-NEXT: $x0 = JALR $x5, 0
+# OUTLINED-NEXT: PseudoRET
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/machine-outliner-leaf-descendants.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/machine-outliner-leaf-descendants.ll
index 8fab0aa9b6a76c..981661466120f4 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/machine-outliner-leaf-descendants.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/machine-outliner-leaf-descendants.ll
@@ -94,7 +94,8 @@ define i32 @_Z2f6v() minsize {
; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: li a3, 0x4
; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: li a4, 0x5
; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: li a5, 0x6
-; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: jr t0
+; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: auipc t1, 0x0
+; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: jr t1 <OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0+0x18>
; CHECK-BASELINE: <OUTLINED_FUNCTION_1>:
; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: li a0, 0x1
@@ -102,8 +103,9 @@ define i32 @_Z2f6v() minsize {
; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: li a2, 0x3
; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: li a3, 0x4
; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: li a4, 0x5
-; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: li a5, 0x7
-; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: jr t0
+; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: li a5, 0x8
+; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: auipc t1, 0x0
+; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: jr t1 <OUTLINED_FUNCTION_1+0x18>
; CHECK-BASELINE: <OUTLINED_FUNCTION_2>:
; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: li a0, 0x1
@@ -111,8 +113,9 @@ define i32 @_Z2f6v() minsize {
; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: li a2, 0x3
; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: li a3, 0x4
; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: li a4, 0x5
-; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: li a5, 0x8
-; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: jr t0
+; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: li a5, 0x7
+; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: auipc t1, 0x0
+; CHECK-BASELINE-NEXT: jr t1 <OUTLINED_FUNCTION_2+0x18>
; CHECK-LEAF-DESCENDANTS: <OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0>:
; CHECK-LEAF-DESCENDANTS-NEXT: li a0, 0x1
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/machine-outliner-patchable.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/machine-outliner-patchable.ll
index 4ef3abd241577f..f6c293f3caf118 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/machine-outliner-patchable.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/machine-outliner-patchable.ll
@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ define void @fentry0(i1 %a) nounwind "fentry-call"="true" {
; CHECK-LABEL: fentry0:
; CHECK-NEXT: # %bb.0:
; CHECK-NEXT: # FEntry call
-; CHECK: # %bb.1:
-; CHECK-NEXT: call t0, OUTLINED_FUNCTION_1
+; CHECK: .LBB0_2:
+; CHECK-NEXT: tail OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0
entry:
br i1 %a, label %if.then, label %if.end
if.then:
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ define void @fentry1(i1 %a) nounwind "fentry-call"="true" {
; CHECK-LABEL: fentry1:
; CHECK-NEXT: # %bb.0:
; CHECK-NEXT: # FEntry call
-; CHECK: # %bb.1:
-; CHECK-NEXT: call t0, OUTLINED_FUNCTION_1
+; CHECK: .LBB1_2:
+; CHECK-NEXT: tail OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0
entry:
br i1 %a, label %if.then, label %if.end
if.then:
@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ define void @patchable0(i1 %a) nounwind "patchable-function-entry"="2" {
; CHECK-NEXT: # %bb.0:
; CHECK-NEXT: nop
; CHECK-NEXT: nop
-; CHECK: # %bb.1:
-; CHECK-NEXT: call t0, OUTLINED_FUNCTION_1
+; CHECK: .LBB2_2:
+; CHECK-NEXT: tail OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0
entry:
br i1 %a, label %if.then, label %if.end
if.then:
@@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ define void @patchable1(i1 %a) nounwind "patchable-function-entry"="2" {
; CHECK-NEXT: # %bb.0:
; CHECK-NEXT: nop
; CHECK-NEXT: nop
-; CHECK: # %bb.1:
-; CHECK-NEXT: call t0, OUTLINED_FUNCTION_1
+; CHECK: .LBB3_2:
+; CHECK-NEXT: tail OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0
entry:
br i1 %a, label %if.then, label %if.end
if.then:
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/machine-outliner-position.mir b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/machine-outliner-position.mir
index 715e212eecabb3..b384c5bca0a6f7 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/machine-outliner-position.mir
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/machine-outliner-position.mir
@@ -25,15 +25,13 @@ body: |
; RV32I-MO-NEXT: {{ $}}
; RV32I-MO-NEXT: $x10 = ORI $x10, 1023
; RV32I-MO-NEXT: EH_LABEL <mcsymbol .Ltmp0>
- ; RV32I-MO-NEXT: $x5 = PseudoCALLReg target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit-def $x5, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
- ; RV32I-MO-NEXT: PseudoRET
+ ; RV32I-MO-NEXT: PseudoTAIL target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit $x2, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x2, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
; RV64I-MO-LABEL: name: func1
; RV64I-MO: liveins: $x10, $x11
; RV64I-MO-NEXT: {{ $}}
; RV64I-MO-NEXT: $x10 = ORI $x10, 1023
; RV64I-MO-NEXT: EH_LABEL <mcsymbol .Ltmp0>
- ; RV64I-MO-NEXT: $x5 = PseudoCALLReg target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit-def $x5, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
- ; RV64I-MO-NEXT: PseudoRET
+ ; RV64I-MO-NEXT: PseudoTAIL target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit $x2, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x2, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
$x10 = ORI $x10, 1023
EH_LABEL <mcsymbol .Ltmp0>
$x11 = ORI $x11, 1023
@@ -53,15 +51,13 @@ body: |
; RV32I-MO-NEXT: {{ $}}
; RV32I-MO-NEXT: $x10 = ORI $x10, 1023
; RV32I-MO-NEXT: GC_LABEL <mcsymbol .Ltmp1>
- ; RV32I-MO-NEXT: $x5 = PseudoCALLReg target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit-def $x5, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
- ; RV32I-MO-NEXT: PseudoRET
+ ; RV32I-MO-NEXT: PseudoTAIL target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit $x2, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x2, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
; RV64I-MO-LABEL: name: func2
; RV64I-MO: liveins: $x10, $x11
; RV64I-MO-NEXT: {{ $}}
; RV64I-MO-NEXT: $x10 = ORI $x10, 1023
; RV64I-MO-NEXT: GC_LABEL <mcsymbol .Ltmp1>
- ; RV64I-MO-NEXT: $x5 = PseudoCALLReg target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit-def $x5, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
- ; RV64I-MO-NEXT: PseudoRET
+ ; RV64I-MO-NEXT: PseudoTAIL target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit $x2, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x2, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
$x10 = ORI $x10, 1023
GC_LABEL <mcsymbol .Ltmp1>
$x11 = ORI $x11, 1023
@@ -81,15 +77,13 @@ body: |
; RV32I-MO-NEXT: {{ $}}
; RV32I-MO-NEXT: $x10 = ORI $x10, 1023
; RV32I-MO-NEXT: ANNOTATION_LABEL <mcsymbol .Ltmp2>
- ; RV32I-MO-NEXT: $x5 = PseudoCALLReg target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit-def $x5, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
- ; RV32I-MO-NEXT: PseudoRET
+ ; RV32I-MO-NEXT: PseudoTAIL target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit $x2, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x2, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
; RV64I-MO-LABEL: name: func3
; RV64I-MO: liveins: $x10, $x11
; RV64I-MO-NEXT: {{ $}}
; RV64I-MO-NEXT: $x10 = ORI $x10, 1023
; RV64I-MO-NEXT: ANNOTATION_LABEL <mcsymbol .Ltmp2>
- ; RV64I-MO-NEXT: $x5 = PseudoCALLReg target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit-def $x5, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
- ; RV64I-MO-NEXT: PseudoRET
+ ; RV64I-MO-NEXT: PseudoTAIL target-flags(riscv-call) @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit $x2, implicit-def $x10, implicit-def $x11, implicit-def $x12, implicit $x2, implicit $x10, implicit $x11
$x10 = ORI $x10, 1023
ANNOTATION_LABEL <mcsymbol .Ltmp2>
$x11 = ORI $x11, 1023
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/machine-outliner-tailcall.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/machine-outliner-tailcall.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..1648a302b723e8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/machine-outliner-tailcall.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --include-generated-funcs --version 5
+; RUN: llc -verify-machineinstrs -enable-machine-outliner -mtriple=riscv32 < %s | FileCheck %s
+source_filename = "/app/example.cpp"
+target datalayout = "e-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-n32-S128"
+target triple = "riscv32-unknown-linux-gnu"
+
+; Function Attrs: minsize mustprogress optsize uwtable
+define dso_local noundef i32 @_Z3fooiiii(i32 noundef %0, i32 noundef %1, i32 noundef %2, i32 noundef %3) local_unnamed_addr #0 {
+ %5 = mul nsw i32 %1, %0
+ %6 = mul nsw i32 %3, %2
+ %7 = add nsw i32 %6, %5
+ %8 = tail call noundef i32 @_Z3bari(i32 noundef %7) #2
+ ret i32 %8
+}
+
+; Function Attrs: minsize optsize
+declare noundef i32 @_Z3bari(i32 noundef) local_unnamed_addr #1
+
+; Function Attrs: minsize mustprogress optsize uwtable
+define dso_local noundef i32 @_Z3foziiii(i32 noundef %0, i32 noundef %1, i32 noundef %2, i32 noundef %3) local_unnamed_addr #0 {
+ %5 = mul nsw i32 %1, %0
+ %6 = mul nsw i32 %3, %2
+ %7 = add nsw i32 %6, %5
+ %8 = tail call noundef i32 @_Z3bari(i32 noundef %7) #2
+ ret i32 %8
+}
+
+attributes #0 = { minsize mustprogress optsize uwtable "no-trapping-math"="true" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "target-cpu"="generic-rv32" "target-features"="+32bit,+a,+c,+d,+f,+m,+relax,+zaamo,+zalrsc,+zicsr,+zifencei,+zmmul,-b,-e,-experimental-smctr,-experimental-ssctr,-experimental-zalasr,-experimental-zicfilp,-experimental-zicfiss,-experimental-zvbc32e,-experimental-zvkgs,-h,-sha,-shcounterenw,-shgatpa,-shtvala,-shvsatpa,-shvstvala,-shvstvecd,-smaia,-smcdeleg,-smcsrind,-smdbltrp,-smepmp,-smmpm,-smnpm,-smrnmi,-smstateen,-ssaia,-ssccfg,-ssccptr,-sscofpmf,-sscounterenw,-sscsrind,-ssdbltrp,-ssnpm,-sspm,-ssqosid,-ssstateen,-ssstrict,-sstc,-sstvala,-sstvecd,-ssu64xl,-supm,-svade,-svadu,-svbare,-svinval,-svnapot,-svpbmt,-svvptc,-v,-xcvalu,-xcvbi,-xcvbitmanip,-xcvelw,-xcvmac...
[truncated]
|
#115297 is already an attempt to do this. Putting this here in case you were not aware of it. |
No, I wasn't aware. Thank you for pointing it out. |
This is modeled on the equivalent path in the AArch64 backend.
Whenever the outlining candidate ends in a terminator, we can use
a tail call to reach it, removing the need to use a link register
or to insert a return instruction in the outlined function.
This improves code size in a size-optimized build of an internal
benchmark by approximately 3%.