Skip to content

[HLSL] Fix call convention mismatch for ctor/dtor #118651

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 8 additions & 4 deletions clang/lib/CodeGen/CGHLSLRuntime.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -507,13 +507,17 @@ void CGHLSLRuntime::generateGlobalCtorDtorCalls() {
IP = Token->getNextNode();
}
IRBuilder<> B(IP);
for (auto *Fn : CtorFns)
B.CreateCall(FunctionCallee(Fn), {}, OB);
for (auto *Fn : CtorFns) {
auto CI = B.CreateCall(FunctionCallee(Fn), {}, OB);
CI->setCallingConv(Fn->getCallingConv());
}

// Insert global dtors before the terminator of the last instruction
B.SetInsertPoint(F.back().getTerminator());
for (auto *Fn : DtorFns)
B.CreateCall(FunctionCallee(Fn), {}, OB);
for (auto *Fn : DtorFns) {
auto CI = B.CreateCall(FunctionCallee(Fn), {}, OB);
CI->setCallingConv(Fn->getCallingConv());
}
}

// No need to keep global ctors/dtors for non-lib profile after call to
Expand Down
21 changes: 21 additions & 0 deletions clang/test/CodeGenHLSL/builtins/RWBuffer-constructor-opt.hlsl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-library -x hlsl -emit-llvm -O3 -o - %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-DXIL
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple spirv-vulkan-compute -x hlsl -emit-llvm -O3 -o - %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-SPIRV
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add a run line that verifies the IR coming out of Clang before optimizations?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is the RWBuffer-constructor.hlsl test that tests almost the same code, but without any optimization passes. Or do you mean another kind of test?


// CHECK-SPIRV: %"class.hlsl::RWBuffer" = type { target("spirv.Image", float, 5, 2, 0, 0, 2, 0) }
// CHECK-DXIL: %"class.hlsl::RWBuffer" = type { target("dx.TypedBuffer", float, 1, 0, 0) }
RWBuffer<float> Buf : register(u5, space3);

[shader("compute")]
[numthreads(1, 1, 1)]
void main() {
// CHECK: define void @main()
// CHECK-NEXT: entry:

// CHECK-SPIRV-NEXT: %Buf_h.i = tail call target("spirv.Image", float, 5, 2, 0, 0, 2, 0) @llvm.spv.handle.fromBinding.tspirv.Image_f32_5_2_0_0_2_0t(i32 3, i32 5, i32 1, i32 0, i1 false)
// CHECK-SPIRV-NEXT: store target("spirv.Image", float, 5, 2, 0, 0, 2, 0) %Buf_h.i, ptr @Buf, align 8

// CHECK-DXIL-NEXT: %Buf_h.i = tail call target("dx.TypedBuffer", float, 1, 0, 0) @llvm.dx.handle.fromBinding.tdx.TypedBuffer_f32_1_0_0t(i32 3, i32 5, i32 1, i32 0, i1 false)
// CHECK-DXIL-NEXT: store target("dx.TypedBuffer", float, 1, 0, 0) %Buf_h.i, ptr @Buf, align 4

// CHECK-NEXT: ret void
}
Loading