-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.4k
[lldb] Add a per-CU API to read the SDK #119022
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb Author: Adrian Prantl (adrian-prantl) ChangesFull diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119022.diff 4 Files Affected:
diff --git a/lldb/include/lldb/Target/Platform.h b/lldb/include/lldb/Target/Platform.h
index f8a2cbf0d5d049..2f954ed18bb830 100644
--- a/lldb/include/lldb/Target/Platform.h
+++ b/lldb/include/lldb/Target/Platform.h
@@ -473,6 +473,38 @@ class Platform : public PluginInterface {
LLVM_PRETTY_FUNCTION, GetName()));
}
+ /// Search CU for the SDK paths the CUs was compiled against. In the
+ /// presence of different SDKs, we try to pick the most appropriate
+ /// one using \ref XcodeSDK::Merge.
+ ///
+ /// \param[in] unit The CU
+ ///
+ /// \returns If successful, returns a pair of a parsed XcodeSDK
+ /// object and a boolean that is 'true' if we encountered
+ /// a conflicting combination of SDKs when parsing the CUs
+ /// (e.g., a public and internal SDK).
+ virtual llvm::Expected<std::pair<XcodeSDK, bool>>
+ GetSDKPathFromDebugInfo(CompileUnit &unit) {
+ return llvm::createStringError(
+ llvm::formatv("{0} not implemented for '{1}' platform.",
+ LLVM_PRETTY_FUNCTION, GetName()));
+ }
+
+ /// Returns the full path of the most appropriate SDK for the
+ /// specified compile unit. This function gets this path by parsing
+ /// debug-info (see \ref `GetSDKPathFromDebugInfo`).
+ ///
+ /// \param[in] unit The CU to scan.
+ ///
+ /// \returns If successful, returns the full path to an
+ /// Xcode SDK.
+ virtual llvm::Expected<std::string>
+ ResolveSDKPathFromDebugInfo(CompileUnit &unit) {
+ return llvm::createStringError(
+ llvm::formatv("{0} not implemented for '{1}' platform.",
+ LLVM_PRETTY_FUNCTION, GetName()));
+ }
+
bool IsHost() const {
return m_is_host; // Is this the default host platform?
}
diff --git a/lldb/source/Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformDarwin.cpp b/lldb/source/Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformDarwin.cpp
index ed0c614cb3576b..90324e388dbf5e 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformDarwin.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformDarwin.cpp
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include "lldb/Interpreter/OptionValueProperties.h"
#include "lldb/Interpreter/OptionValueString.h"
#include "lldb/Interpreter/Options.h"
+#include "lldb/Symbol/CompileUnit.h"
#include "lldb/Symbol/ObjectFile.h"
#include "lldb/Symbol/SymbolFile.h"
#include "lldb/Symbol/SymbolVendor.h"
@@ -1429,3 +1430,40 @@ PlatformDarwin::ResolveSDKPathFromDebugInfo(Module &module) {
return path_or_err->str();
}
+
+llvm::Expected<std::pair<XcodeSDK, bool>>
+PlatformDarwin::GetSDKPathFromDebugInfo(CompileUnit &unit) {
+ ModuleSP module_sp = unit.CalculateSymbolContextModule();
+ if (!module_sp)
+ return llvm::createStringError("compile unit has no module");
+ SymbolFile *sym_file = module_sp->GetSymbolFile();
+ if (!sym_file)
+ return llvm::createStringError(
+ llvm::formatv("No symbol file available for module '{0}'",
+ module_sp->GetFileSpec().GetFilename()));
+
+ const bool found_mismatch = false;
+ return std::pair{sym_file->ParseXcodeSDK(unit), found_mismatch};
+}
+
+llvm::Expected<std::string>
+PlatformDarwin::ResolveSDKPathFromDebugInfo(CompileUnit &unit) {
+ auto sdk_or_err = GetSDKPathFromDebugInfo(unit);
+ if (!sdk_or_err)
+ return llvm::createStringError(
+ llvm::inconvertibleErrorCode(),
+ llvm::formatv("Failed to parse SDK path from debug-info: {0}",
+ llvm::toString(sdk_or_err.takeError())));
+
+ auto [sdk, _] = std::move(*sdk_or_err);
+
+ auto path_or_err = HostInfo::GetSDKRoot(HostInfo::SDKOptions{sdk});
+ if (!path_or_err)
+ return llvm::createStringError(
+ llvm::inconvertibleErrorCode(),
+ llvm::formatv("Error while searching for SDK (XcodeSDK '{0}'): {1}",
+ sdk.GetString(),
+ llvm::toString(path_or_err.takeError())));
+
+ return path_or_err->str();
+}
diff --git a/lldb/source/Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformDarwin.h b/lldb/source/Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformDarwin.h
index 66a26d2f496776..157709424893c2 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformDarwin.h
+++ b/lldb/source/Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformDarwin.h
@@ -130,6 +130,12 @@ class PlatformDarwin : public PlatformPOSIX {
llvm::Expected<std::string>
ResolveSDKPathFromDebugInfo(Module &module) override;
+ llvm::Expected<std::pair<XcodeSDK, bool>>
+ GetSDKPathFromDebugInfo(CompileUnit &unit) override;
+
+ llvm::Expected<std::string>
+ ResolveSDKPathFromDebugInfo(CompileUnit &unit) override;
+
protected:
static const char *GetCompatibleArch(ArchSpec::Core core, size_t idx);
diff --git a/lldb/unittests/SymbolFile/DWARF/XcodeSDKModuleTests.cpp b/lldb/unittests/SymbolFile/DWARF/XcodeSDKModuleTests.cpp
index f1998a92f19b05..fc008ca7011e44 100644
--- a/lldb/unittests/SymbolFile/DWARF/XcodeSDKModuleTests.cpp
+++ b/lldb/unittests/SymbolFile/DWARF/XcodeSDKModuleTests.cpp
@@ -268,6 +268,13 @@ TEST_P(SDKPathParsingMultiparamTests, TestSDKPathFromDebugInfo) {
EXPECT_EQ(found_mismatch, expect_mismatch);
EXPECT_EQ(sdk.IsAppleInternalSDK(), expect_internal_sdk);
EXPECT_NE(sdk.GetString().find(expect_sdk_path_pattern), std::string::npos);
+
+ {
+ auto sdk_or_err =
+ platform_sp->GetSDKPathFromDebugInfo(*dwarf_cu->GetLLDBCompUnit());
+ ASSERT_TRUE(static_cast<bool>(sdk_or_err));
+ EXPECT_EQ(sdk.IsAppleInternalSDK(), expect_internal_sdk);
+ }
}
SDKPathParsingTestData sdkPathParsingTestCases[] = {
|
lldb/include/lldb/Target/Platform.h
Outdated
/// object and a boolean that is 'true' if we encountered | ||
/// a conflicting combination of SDKs when parsing the CUs | ||
/// (e.g., a public and internal SDK). | ||
virtual llvm::Expected<std::pair<XcodeSDK, bool>> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not very related to this change but it looks like this base Platform
class which is supposed to be generic has some methods specific to the certain platforms ...
This could be part of @bulbazord Platform refactor but maybe we should have a SDK
base class that'd be returned here instead of the the Darwin platform specific XcodeSDK
return type.
This is needed by the Swift plugin.
aadb454
to
60ab35f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]>
You can test this locally with the following command:git-clang-format --diff 1d95825d4d168a17a4f27401dec3f2977a59a70e 4facb5fc17280c27af99b014e621f7a573afb929 --extensions h,cpp -- lldb/include/lldb/Target/Platform.h lldb/source/Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformDarwin.cpp lldb/source/Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformDarwin.h lldb/unittests/SymbolFile/DWARF/XcodeSDKModuleTests.cpp View the diff from clang-format here.diff --git a/lldb/include/lldb/Target/Platform.h b/lldb/include/lldb/Target/Platform.h
index a702abb540..d6864798ea 100644
--- a/lldb/include/lldb/Target/Platform.h
+++ b/lldb/include/lldb/Target/Platform.h
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ public:
///
/// \param[in] unit The CU
///
- /// \returns A parsed XcodeSDK object if successful, an Error otherwise.
+ /// \returns A parsed XcodeSDK object if successful, an Error otherwise.
virtual llvm::Expected<XcodeSDK> GetSDKPathFromDebugInfo(CompileUnit &unit) {
return llvm::createStringError(
llvm::formatv("{0} not implemented for '{1}' platform.",
|
/// \param[in] unit The CU | ||
/// | ||
/// \returns A parsed XcodeSDK object if successful, an Error otherwise. | ||
virtual llvm::Expected<XcodeSDK> GetSDKPathFromDebugInfo(CompileUnit &unit) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we abstract a base class for SDK and have XcodeSDK become a plug-in?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd volunteer to do that work if we had another platform that also has a concept of an SDK. Otherwise it'd be dangerous that I design the base class to be way too close to Xcode's SDK properties.
The Swift plugin would find this useful.