-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[clang] Fix a dangling reference in clang/utils/TableGen/ClangDiagnosticsEmitter.cpp #119197
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe replace with
llvm::StringMap
to get better performance and avoid these problems for good?I would be surprised if the
StringRef
in the map is critical for performance and I am 99% certain thatStringMap
will likely win overstd::map<StringRef, ...
anyway.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting, there is a recent commit which changes the
map<std::string, ...>
tomap<llvm::StringRef, ...>
, 17c6ec6 , which leads to this dangling reference, cc @jurahulIf we want to change to StringMap, I think it is a separate change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed, changing to StringMap would be a different change. Also, we need to check if that ok to do in case we iterate over the map in a way that requires deterministic iteration order (and if StringMap does not guarantee that).
Can you fix the clang-format issue before approving?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we need to have stable order, let's document it. Could you elaborate what is "different" about a change to StringMap?
It's a container that does key-value lookups with string keys. It is efficient, widely used in LLVM and fully avoids this class of errors. Are there any downsides of using it (assuming we don't need to stable iteration order that std::map provides?)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, we need to document it. I can see from the code that we iterate over the map (in emitDiagTable)
with std::map, this iteration happens in an order sorted by the keys in the map. And that is needed so that the tablegen generated code is deterministic. I don't think StringMap has similar iteration order guarantees. See https://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#llvm-adt-stringmap-h