-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.4k
LAA: regen a test with UTC (NFC) #122748
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LAA: regen a test with UTC (NFC) #122748
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-analysis Author: Ramkumar Ramachandra (artagnon) ChangesFull diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122748.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/wrapping-pointer-versioning.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/wrapping-pointer-versioning.ll
index 1ebe91a044b783..71c20bc2b2a824 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/wrapping-pointer-versioning.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/wrapping-pointer-versioning.ll
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-; RUN: opt -passes='print<access-info>' -aa-pipeline='basic-aa' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=LAA
-
-target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_analyze_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: opt -passes='print<access-info>' -aa-pipeline='basic-aa' \
+; RUN: -disable-output %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; For this loop:
; unsigned index = 0;
@@ -19,24 +19,33 @@ target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
; to check that the pointers don't wrap since the GEPs are not
; inbound.
-; LAA-LABEL: f1
-; LAA: Memory dependences are safe{{$}}
-; LAA: SCEV assumptions:
-; LAA: {0,+,2}<%for.body> Added Flags: <nusw>
-; LAA-NEXT: {%a,+,4}<%for.body> Added Flags: <nusw>
-
; The expression for %mul_ext as analyzed by SCEV is
; (zext i32 {0,+,2}<%for.body> to i64)
; We have added the nusw flag to turn this expression into the SCEV expression:
; i64 {0,+,2}<%for.body>
-; LAA: [PSE] %arrayidxA = getelementptr i16, ptr %a, i64 %mul_ext:
-; LAA-NEXT: ((2 * (zext i32 {0,+,2}<%for.body> to i64))<nuw><nsw> + %a)
-; LAA-NEXT: --> {%a,+,4}<%for.body>
-
-
-define void @f1(ptr noalias %a,
- ptr noalias %b, i64 %N) {
+define void @f1(ptr noalias %a, ptr noalias %b, i64 %N) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'f1'
+; CHECK-NEXT: for.body:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Memory dependences are safe
+; CHECK-NEXT: Dependences:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Forward:
+; CHECK-NEXT: %loadA = load i16, ptr %arrayidxA, align 2 ->
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i16 %add, ptr %arrayidxA, align 2
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Run-time memory checks:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Grouped accesses:
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Non vectorizable stores to invariant address were not found in loop.
+; CHECK-NEXT: SCEV assumptions:
+; CHECK-NEXT: {0,+,2}<%for.body> Added Flags: <nusw>
+; CHECK-NEXT: {%a,+,4}<%for.body> Added Flags: <nusw>
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Expressions re-written:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [PSE] %arrayidxA = getelementptr i16, ptr %a, i64 %mul_ext:
+; CHECK-NEXT: ((2 * (zext i32 {0,+,2}<%for.body> to i64))<nuw><nsw> + %a)
+; CHECK-NEXT: --> {%a,+,4}<%for.body>
+;
entry:
br label %for.body
@@ -86,23 +95,33 @@ for.end: ; preds = %for.body
; This loop has a negative stride for A, and the nusw flag is required in
; order to properly extend the increment from i32 -4 to i64 -4.
-; LAA-LABEL: f2
-; LAA: Memory dependences are safe{{$}}
-; LAA: SCEV assumptions:
-; LAA-NEXT: {(2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)),+,-2}<%for.body> Added Flags: <nusw>
-; LAA-NEXT: {((4 * (zext i31 (trunc i64 %N to i31) to i64))<nuw><nsw> + %a),+,-4}<%for.body> Added Flags: <nusw>
-
; The expression for %mul_ext as analyzed by SCEV is
; (zext i32 {(2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)),+,-2}<%for.body> to i64)
; We have added the nusw flag to turn this expression into the following SCEV:
; i64 {zext i32 (2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)) to i64,+,-2}<%for.body>
-; LAA: [PSE] %arrayidxA = getelementptr i16, ptr %a, i64 %mul_ext:
-; LAA-NEXT: ((2 * (zext i32 {(2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)),+,-2}<%for.body> to i64))<nuw><nsw> + %a)
-; LAA-NEXT: --> {((4 * (zext i31 (trunc i64 %N to i31) to i64))<nuw><nsw> + %a),+,-4}<%for.body>
-
-define void @f2(ptr noalias %a,
- ptr noalias %b, i64 %N) {
+define void @f2(ptr noalias %a, ptr noalias %b, i64 %N) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'f2'
+; CHECK-NEXT: for.body:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Memory dependences are safe
+; CHECK-NEXT: Dependences:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Forward:
+; CHECK-NEXT: %loadA = load i16, ptr %arrayidxA, align 2 ->
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i16 %add, ptr %arrayidxA, align 2
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Run-time memory checks:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Grouped accesses:
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Non vectorizable stores to invariant address were not found in loop.
+; CHECK-NEXT: SCEV assumptions:
+; CHECK-NEXT: {(2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)),+,-2}<%for.body> Added Flags: <nusw>
+; CHECK-NEXT: {((4 * (zext i31 (trunc i64 %N to i31) to i64))<nuw><nsw> + %a),+,-4}<%for.body> Added Flags: <nusw>
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Expressions re-written:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [PSE] %arrayidxA = getelementptr i16, ptr %a, i64 %mul_ext:
+; CHECK-NEXT: ((2 * (zext i32 {(2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)),+,-2}<%for.body> to i64))<nuw><nsw> + %a)
+; CHECK-NEXT: --> {((4 * (zext i31 (trunc i64 %N to i31) to i64))<nuw><nsw> + %a),+,-4}<%for.body>
+;
entry:
%TruncN = trunc i64 %N to i32
br label %for.body
@@ -137,23 +156,33 @@ for.end: ; preds = %for.body
; We replicate the tests above, but this time sign extend 2 * index instead
; of zero extending it.
-; LAA-LABEL: f3
-; LAA: Memory dependences are safe{{$}}
-; LAA: SCEV assumptions:
-; LAA-NEXT: {0,+,2}<%for.body> Added Flags: <nssw>
-; LAA-NEXT: {%a,+,4}<%for.body> Added Flags: <nusw>
-
; The expression for %mul_ext as analyzed by SCEV is
; i64 (sext i32 {0,+,2}<%for.body> to i64)
; We have added the nssw flag to turn this expression into the following SCEV:
; i64 {0,+,2}<%for.body>
-; LAA: [PSE] %arrayidxA = getelementptr i16, ptr %a, i64 %mul_ext:
-; LAA-NEXT: ((2 * (sext i32 {0,+,2}<%for.body> to i64))<nsw> + %a)
-; LAA-NEXT: --> {%a,+,4}<%for.body>
-
-define void @f3(ptr noalias %a,
- ptr noalias %b, i64 %N) {
+define void @f3(ptr noalias %a, ptr noalias %b, i64 %N) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'f3'
+; CHECK-NEXT: for.body:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Memory dependences are safe
+; CHECK-NEXT: Dependences:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Forward:
+; CHECK-NEXT: %loadA = load i16, ptr %arrayidxA, align 2 ->
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i16 %add, ptr %arrayidxA, align 2
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Run-time memory checks:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Grouped accesses:
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Non vectorizable stores to invariant address were not found in loop.
+; CHECK-NEXT: SCEV assumptions:
+; CHECK-NEXT: {0,+,2}<%for.body> Added Flags: <nssw>
+; CHECK-NEXT: {%a,+,4}<%for.body> Added Flags: <nusw>
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Expressions re-written:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [PSE] %arrayidxA = getelementptr i16, ptr %a, i64 %mul_ext:
+; CHECK-NEXT: ((2 * (sext i32 {0,+,2}<%for.body> to i64))<nsw> + %a)
+; CHECK-NEXT: --> {%a,+,4}<%for.body>
+;
entry:
br label %for.body
@@ -184,23 +213,33 @@ for.end: ; preds = %for.body
ret void
}
-; LAA-LABEL: f4
-; LAA: Memory dependences are safe{{$}}
-; LAA: SCEV assumptions:
-; LAA-NEXT: {(2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)),+,-2}<%for.body> Added Flags: <nssw>
-; LAA-NEXT: {((2 * (sext i32 (2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)) to i64))<nsw> + %a),+,-4}<%for.body> Added Flags: <nusw>
-
; The expression for %mul_ext as analyzed by SCEV is
; i64 (sext i32 {(2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)),+,-2}<%for.body> to i64)
; We have added the nssw flag to turn this expression into the following SCEV:
; i64 {sext i32 (2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)) to i64,+,-2}<%for.body>
-; LAA: [PSE] %arrayidxA = getelementptr i16, ptr %a, i64 %mul_ext:
-; LAA-NEXT: ((2 * (sext i32 {(2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)),+,-2}<%for.body> to i64))<nsw> + %a)
-; LAA-NEXT: --> {((2 * (sext i32 (2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)) to i64))<nsw> + %a),+,-4}<%for.body>
-
-define void @f4(ptr noalias %a,
- ptr noalias %b, i64 %N) {
+define void @f4(ptr noalias %a, ptr noalias %b, i64 %N) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'f4'
+; CHECK-NEXT: for.body:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Memory dependences are safe
+; CHECK-NEXT: Dependences:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Forward:
+; CHECK-NEXT: %loadA = load i16, ptr %arrayidxA, align 2 ->
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i16 %add, ptr %arrayidxA, align 2
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Run-time memory checks:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Grouped accesses:
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Non vectorizable stores to invariant address were not found in loop.
+; CHECK-NEXT: SCEV assumptions:
+; CHECK-NEXT: {(2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)),+,-2}<%for.body> Added Flags: <nssw>
+; CHECK-NEXT: {((2 * (sext i32 (2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)) to i64))<nsw> + %a),+,-4}<%for.body> Added Flags: <nusw>
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Expressions re-written:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [PSE] %arrayidxA = getelementptr i16, ptr %a, i64 %mul_ext:
+; CHECK-NEXT: ((2 * (sext i32 {(2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)),+,-2}<%for.body> to i64))<nsw> + %a)
+; CHECK-NEXT: --> {((2 * (sext i32 (2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)) to i64))<nsw> + %a),+,-4}<%for.body>
+;
entry:
%TruncN = trunc i64 %N to i32
br label %for.body
@@ -239,18 +278,27 @@ for.end: ; preds = %for.body
;
; We can still analyze this by adding the required no wrap SCEV predicates.
-; LAA-LABEL: f5
-; LAA: Memory dependences are safe{{$}}
-; LAA: SCEV assumptions:
-; LAA-NEXT: {(2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)),+,-2}<%for.body> Added Flags: <nssw>
-; LAA-EMPTY:
-
-; LAA: [PSE] %arrayidxA = getelementptr inbounds i16, ptr %a, i32 %mul:
-; LAA-NEXT: ((2 * (sext i32 {(2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)),+,-2}<%for.body> to i64))<nsw> + %a)
-; LAA-NEXT: --> {((2 * (sext i32 (2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)) to i64))<nsw> + %a),+,-4}<%for.body>
-
-define void @f5(ptr noalias %a,
- ptr noalias %b, i64 %N) {
+define void @f5(ptr noalias %a, ptr noalias %b, i64 %N) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'f5'
+; CHECK-NEXT: for.body:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Memory dependences are safe
+; CHECK-NEXT: Dependences:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Forward:
+; CHECK-NEXT: %loadA = load i16, ptr %arrayidxA, align 2 ->
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i16 %add, ptr %arrayidxA, align 2
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Run-time memory checks:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Grouped accesses:
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Non vectorizable stores to invariant address were not found in loop.
+; CHECK-NEXT: SCEV assumptions:
+; CHECK-NEXT: {(2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)),+,-2}<%for.body> Added Flags: <nssw>
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Expressions re-written:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [PSE] %arrayidxA = getelementptr inbounds i16, ptr %a, i32 %mul:
+; CHECK-NEXT: ((2 * (sext i32 {(2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)),+,-2}<%for.body> to i64))<nsw> + %a)
+; CHECK-NEXT: --> {((2 * (sext i32 (2 * (trunc i64 %N to i32)) to i64))<nsw> + %a),+,-4}<%for.body>
+;
entry:
%TruncN = trunc i64 %N to i32
br label %for.body
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks
No description provided.