-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[RISCV] Select Zvkb VANDN for shorter constant loading sequences #123345
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shall I check if that's not the passthru operand? If so, how to test it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ISD::AND doesn't have a passthru. For RISCV::AND_VL you would need to loop through
U->uses()
instead ofU->users()
. That will give you anSDUse &
. From there you can callSDUse::getUser()
to getV
andSDUse::getOperandNo
to get the operand number of the use. The passthru will be operand 2.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How to test? Is
@llvm.riscv.vand
's first operand the passthru?Would it be possible for the same
VMV_V_X_VL
to be the AND_VL passthru and one of the AND_VL "and" operands at the same time?Would the following work:
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@llvm.riscv.vand
usesISD::INTRINSIC_WO_CHAIN
rather than thanRISCVISD::AND_VL
.RISCVISD::AND_VL
is primarily created from@llvm.vp.and
orand
on fixed vectors. There may be other sequences that requires an AND as part of a larger pattern.I'm not sure if we ever use the passthru operand of
RISCVISD::AND_VL
for anything other than undef. There are many opcodes that are defined with the same operand structure, but we don't use the passthru for all of them.I think its possible.
I think that works.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will you approve this PR as-is then?
I don't think adding untested code is a good idea. In the unlikely event of
U
somehow appearing in passthru, it would only lead to somewhat suboptimal code.