-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[flang][NFC] do not hard code KIND 10 and 16 in lowering tests #124966
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
75bec72
[flang][NFC] do not hard code KIND 10 and 16 in lowering tests
jeanPerier c623e8e
push aint lost change
jeanPerier 5f4cb72
refactor ieee_next test for easier lit testing
jeanPerier a889600
Apply suggestions from code review
jeanPerier 8810800
fix ieee_next on windows
jeanPerier File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oooh, that's clever!
I do have a question: why use minimal kind as 4 and not 8? Kind 10 was a special kind for fp80, right? So fp64 seems to be closer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The goal is just to get some KIND that will compile so that the rest of the tests in the files work, the kind does not really matter (the IR is not tested when 10 is not selected). I took 4 because that is our default kind.
I could also have used ifdefs, but that requires preprocessing and is less portable (and for kind16, I was not sure how to pick an ifdef).