-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[lldb] Implement bidirectional access for backing<->backed thread relationship #125300
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
felipepiovezan
merged 4 commits into
llvm:main
from
felipepiovezan:felipe/bidirection_backing_backed
Feb 3, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0c9d9ed
[lldb] Implement bidirectional access for backing<->backed thread rel…
felipepiovezan b19eb1c
fixup! Address review comments
felipepiovezan c54af40
fixup! Fix documentation typo
felipepiovezan 1882d04
fixup! Break circular shared_ptr references
felipepiovezan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -72,12 +72,17 @@ class ThreadMemory : public lldb_private::Thread { | |
|
||
void ClearStackFrames() override; | ||
|
||
void ClearBackingThread() override { m_backing_thread_sp.reset(); } | ||
void ClearBackingThread() override { | ||
if (m_backing_thread_sp) | ||
m_backing_thread_sp->ClearBackedThread(); | ||
m_backing_thread_sp.reset(); | ||
} | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I really wanted to make |
||
|
||
bool SetBackingThread(const lldb::ThreadSP &thread_sp) override { | ||
// printf ("Thread 0x%llx is being backed by thread 0x%llx\n", GetID(), | ||
// thread_sp->GetID()); | ||
m_backing_thread_sp = thread_sp; | ||
thread_sp->SetBackedThread(*this); | ||
return (bool)thread_sp; | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You have an assert that's requiring that
backed_thread
has to have had its backing thread set first, then passed to this API. Would it be a more user-friendly API if it set the backed_thread's backing thread here, if it isn't already set.It's still fine to assert if somebody set the wrong backing thread, that seems like an unintended error. But if the backed_thread.GetBackingThread was null, is there any reason not to set it for them here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point, this also addresses my concern of people calling
SetBackedThread
without also callingSetBackingThread
. Will update.