Skip to content

[RISCV] Added cost model for fmuladd #125683

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 5, 2025
Merged

Conversation

mikhailramalho
Copy link
Member

@mikhailramalho mikhailramalho commented Feb 4, 2025

This patch updates the cost model for fmuladd on vector types to scale with LMUL. This was found when analyzing a hot loop in 519.lbm_r that was unprofitably vectorized, but doesn't directly impact that case and is split off so it doesn't get forgotten.

Unlike other FP arithmetic ops, it's not scaled by 2 because the scalar cost isn't scaled by 2.

This patch updates the cost model for fmuladd to scale with LMUL. This was
found when analyzing a hot loop in 519.lbm_r that was unprofitably vectorized.

Unlike other FP arithmetic ops, it's not scaled by 2 because the scalar cost
isn't scaled by 2.
@llvmbot llvmbot added backend:RISC-V llvm:analysis Includes value tracking, cost tables and constant folding labels Feb 4, 2025
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Feb 4, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-analysis

@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v

Author: Mikhail R. Gadelha (mikhailramalho)

Changes

This patch updates the cost model for fmuladd to scale with LMUL. This was found when analyzing a hot loop in 519.lbm_r that was unprofitably vectorized.

Unlike other FP arithmetic ops, it's not scaled by 2 because the scalar cost isn't scaled by 2.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125683.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVTargetTransformInfo.cpp (+8)
  • (modified) llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/RISCV/arith-fp.ll (+28-41)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVTargetTransformInfo.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVTargetTransformInfo.cpp
index fa7c7c57be2572..73b935232e002e 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVTargetTransformInfo.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVTargetTransformInfo.cpp
@@ -1138,6 +1138,14 @@ RISCVTTIImpl::getIntrinsicInstrCost(const IntrinsicCostAttributes &ICA,
     }
     break;
   }
+  case Intrinsic::fmuladd: {
+    // TODO: handle promotion with f16/bf16 with zvfhmin/zvfbfmin
+    auto LT = getTypeLegalizationCost(RetTy);
+    if (ST->hasVInstructions() && LT.second.isVector())
+      return LT.first *
+             getRISCVInstructionCost(RISCV::VFMADD_VV, LT.second, CostKind);
+    break;
+  }
   case Intrinsic::fabs: {
     auto LT = getTypeLegalizationCost(RetTy);
     if (ST->hasVInstructions() && LT.second.isVector()) {
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/RISCV/arith-fp.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/RISCV/arith-fp.ll
index d85c9e2a19209c..0928935b43db2a 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/RISCV/arith-fp.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/RISCV/arith-fp.ll
@@ -1508,30 +1508,30 @@ define void @fmuladd() {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %4 = call <2 x bfloat> @llvm.fmuladd.v2bf16(<2 x bfloat> undef, <2 x bfloat> undef, <2 x bfloat> undef)
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %5 = call <4 x bfloat> @llvm.fmuladd.v4bf16(<4 x bfloat> undef, <4 x bfloat> undef, <4 x bfloat> undef)
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %6 = call <8 x bfloat> @llvm.fmuladd.v8bf16(<8 x bfloat> undef, <8 x bfloat> undef, <8 x bfloat> undef)
-; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %7 = call <16 x bfloat> @llvm.fmuladd.v16bf16(<16 x bfloat> undef, <16 x bfloat> undef, <16 x bfloat> undef)
-; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 2 for instruction: %8 = call <2 x float> @llvm.fmuladd.v2f32(<2 x float> undef, <2 x float> undef, <2 x float> undef)
-; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 2 for instruction: %9 = call <4 x float> @llvm.fmuladd.v4f32(<4 x float> undef, <4 x float> undef, <4 x float> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 2 for instruction: %7 = call <16 x bfloat> @llvm.fmuladd.v16bf16(<16 x bfloat> undef, <16 x bfloat> undef, <16 x bfloat> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %8 = call <2 x float> @llvm.fmuladd.v2f32(<2 x float> undef, <2 x float> undef, <2 x float> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %9 = call <4 x float> @llvm.fmuladd.v4f32(<4 x float> undef, <4 x float> undef, <4 x float> undef)
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 2 for instruction: %10 = call <8 x float> @llvm.fmuladd.v8f32(<8 x float> undef, <8 x float> undef, <8 x float> undef)
-; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 2 for instruction: %11 = call <16 x float> @llvm.fmuladd.v16f32(<16 x float> undef, <16 x float> undef, <16 x float> undef)
-; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 2 for instruction: %12 = call <2 x double> @llvm.fmuladd.v2f64(<2 x double> undef, <2 x double> undef, <2 x double> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 4 for instruction: %11 = call <16 x float> @llvm.fmuladd.v16f32(<16 x float> undef, <16 x float> undef, <16 x float> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %12 = call <2 x double> @llvm.fmuladd.v2f64(<2 x double> undef, <2 x double> undef, <2 x double> undef)
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 2 for instruction: %13 = call <4 x double> @llvm.fmuladd.v4f64(<4 x double> undef, <4 x double> undef, <4 x double> undef)
-; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 2 for instruction: %14 = call <8 x double> @llvm.fmuladd.v8f64(<8 x double> undef, <8 x double> undef, <8 x double> undef)
-; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 2 for instruction: %15 = call <16 x double> @llvm.fmuladd.v16f64(<16 x double> undef, <16 x double> undef, <16 x double> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 4 for instruction: %14 = call <8 x double> @llvm.fmuladd.v8f64(<8 x double> undef, <8 x double> undef, <8 x double> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 8 for instruction: %15 = call <16 x double> @llvm.fmuladd.v16f64(<16 x double> undef, <16 x double> undef, <16 x double> undef)
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %16 = call <vscale x 1 x bfloat> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv1bf16(<vscale x 1 x bfloat> undef, <vscale x 1 x bfloat> undef, <vscale x 1 x bfloat> undef)
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %17 = call <vscale x 2 x bfloat> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv2bf16(<vscale x 2 x bfloat> undef, <vscale x 2 x bfloat> undef, <vscale x 2 x bfloat> undef)
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %18 = call <vscale x 4 x bfloat> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv4bf16(<vscale x 4 x bfloat> undef, <vscale x 4 x bfloat> undef, <vscale x 4 x bfloat> undef)
-; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %19 = call <vscale x 8 x bfloat> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv8bf16(<vscale x 8 x bfloat> undef, <vscale x 8 x bfloat> undef, <vscale x 8 x bfloat> undef)
-; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %20 = call <vscale x 16 x bfloat> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv16bf16(<vscale x 16 x bfloat> undef, <vscale x 16 x bfloat> undef, <vscale x 16 x bfloat> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 2 for instruction: %19 = call <vscale x 8 x bfloat> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv8bf16(<vscale x 8 x bfloat> undef, <vscale x 8 x bfloat> undef, <vscale x 8 x bfloat> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 4 for instruction: %20 = call <vscale x 16 x bfloat> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv16bf16(<vscale x 16 x bfloat> undef, <vscale x 16 x bfloat> undef, <vscale x 16 x bfloat> undef)
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %21 = call <vscale x 1 x float> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv1f32(<vscale x 1 x float> undef, <vscale x 1 x float> undef, <vscale x 1 x float> undef)
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %22 = call <vscale x 2 x float> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv2f32(<vscale x 2 x float> undef, <vscale x 2 x float> undef, <vscale x 2 x float> undef)
-; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %23 = call <vscale x 4 x float> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv4f32(<vscale x 4 x float> undef, <vscale x 4 x float> undef, <vscale x 4 x float> undef)
-; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %24 = call <vscale x 8 x float> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv8f32(<vscale x 8 x float> undef, <vscale x 8 x float> undef, <vscale x 8 x float> undef)
-; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %25 = call <vscale x 16 x float> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv16f32(<vscale x 16 x float> undef, <vscale x 16 x float> undef, <vscale x 16 x float> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 2 for instruction: %23 = call <vscale x 4 x float> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv4f32(<vscale x 4 x float> undef, <vscale x 4 x float> undef, <vscale x 4 x float> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 4 for instruction: %24 = call <vscale x 8 x float> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv8f32(<vscale x 8 x float> undef, <vscale x 8 x float> undef, <vscale x 8 x float> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 8 for instruction: %25 = call <vscale x 16 x float> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv16f32(<vscale x 16 x float> undef, <vscale x 16 x float> undef, <vscale x 16 x float> undef)
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %26 = call <vscale x 1 x double> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv1f64(<vscale x 1 x double> undef, <vscale x 1 x double> undef, <vscale x 1 x double> undef)
-; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %27 = call <vscale x 2 x double> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv2f64(<vscale x 2 x double> undef, <vscale x 2 x double> undef, <vscale x 2 x double> undef)
-; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %28 = call <vscale x 4 x double> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv4f64(<vscale x 4 x double> undef, <vscale x 4 x double> undef, <vscale x 4 x double> undef)
-; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %29 = call <vscale x 8 x double> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv8f64(<vscale x 8 x double> undef, <vscale x 8 x double> undef, <vscale x 8 x double> undef)
-; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 4 for instruction: %30 = call <vscale x 16 x double> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv16f64(<vscale x 16 x double> undef, <vscale x 16 x double> undef, <vscale x 16 x double> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 2 for instruction: %27 = call <vscale x 2 x double> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv2f64(<vscale x 2 x double> undef, <vscale x 2 x double> undef, <vscale x 2 x double> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 4 for instruction: %28 = call <vscale x 4 x double> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv4f64(<vscale x 4 x double> undef, <vscale x 4 x double> undef, <vscale x 4 x double> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 8 for instruction: %29 = call <vscale x 8 x double> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv8f64(<vscale x 8 x double> undef, <vscale x 8 x double> undef, <vscale x 8 x double> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 16 for instruction: %30 = call <vscale x 16 x double> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv16f64(<vscale x 16 x double> undef, <vscale x 16 x double> undef, <vscale x 16 x double> undef)
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 0 for instruction: ret void
 ;
   call bfloat @llvm.fmuladd.bf16(bfloat undef, bfloat undef, bfloat undef)
@@ -1568,31 +1568,18 @@ define void @fmuladd() {
 }
 
 define void @fmuladd_f16() {
-; ZVFH-LABEL: 'fmuladd_f16'
-; ZVFH-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %1 = call half @llvm.fmuladd.f16(half undef, half undef, half undef)
-; ZVFH-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 2 for instruction: %2 = call <2 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.v2f16(<2 x half> undef, <2 x half> undef, <2 x half> undef)
-; ZVFH-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 2 for instruction: %3 = call <4 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.v4f16(<4 x half> undef, <4 x half> undef, <4 x half> undef)
-; ZVFH-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 2 for instruction: %4 = call <8 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.v8f16(<8 x half> undef, <8 x half> undef, <8 x half> undef)
-; ZVFH-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 2 for instruction: %5 = call <16 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.v16f16(<16 x half> undef, <16 x half> undef, <16 x half> undef)
-; ZVFH-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %6 = call <vscale x 1 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv1f16(<vscale x 1 x half> undef, <vscale x 1 x half> undef, <vscale x 1 x half> undef)
-; ZVFH-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %7 = call <vscale x 2 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv2f16(<vscale x 2 x half> undef, <vscale x 2 x half> undef, <vscale x 2 x half> undef)
-; ZVFH-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %8 = call <vscale x 4 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv4f16(<vscale x 4 x half> undef, <vscale x 4 x half> undef, <vscale x 4 x half> undef)
-; ZVFH-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %9 = call <vscale x 8 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv8f16(<vscale x 8 x half> undef, <vscale x 8 x half> undef, <vscale x 8 x half> undef)
-; ZVFH-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %10 = call <vscale x 16 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv16f16(<vscale x 16 x half> undef, <vscale x 16 x half> undef, <vscale x 16 x half> undef)
-; ZVFH-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 0 for instruction: ret void
-;
-; ZVFHMIN-LABEL: 'fmuladd_f16'
-; ZVFHMIN-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %1 = call half @llvm.fmuladd.f16(half undef, half undef, half undef)
-; ZVFHMIN-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %2 = call <2 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.v2f16(<2 x half> undef, <2 x half> undef, <2 x half> undef)
-; ZVFHMIN-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %3 = call <4 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.v4f16(<4 x half> undef, <4 x half> undef, <4 x half> undef)
-; ZVFHMIN-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %4 = call <8 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.v8f16(<8 x half> undef, <8 x half> undef, <8 x half> undef)
-; ZVFHMIN-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %5 = call <16 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.v16f16(<16 x half> undef, <16 x half> undef, <16 x half> undef)
-; ZVFHMIN-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %6 = call <vscale x 1 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv1f16(<vscale x 1 x half> undef, <vscale x 1 x half> undef, <vscale x 1 x half> undef)
-; ZVFHMIN-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %7 = call <vscale x 2 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv2f16(<vscale x 2 x half> undef, <vscale x 2 x half> undef, <vscale x 2 x half> undef)
-; ZVFHMIN-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %8 = call <vscale x 4 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv4f16(<vscale x 4 x half> undef, <vscale x 4 x half> undef, <vscale x 4 x half> undef)
-; ZVFHMIN-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %9 = call <vscale x 8 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv8f16(<vscale x 8 x half> undef, <vscale x 8 x half> undef, <vscale x 8 x half> undef)
-; ZVFHMIN-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %10 = call <vscale x 16 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv16f16(<vscale x 16 x half> undef, <vscale x 16 x half> undef, <vscale x 16 x half> undef)
-; ZVFHMIN-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 0 for instruction: ret void
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'fmuladd_f16'
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %1 = call half @llvm.fmuladd.f16(half undef, half undef, half undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %2 = call <2 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.v2f16(<2 x half> undef, <2 x half> undef, <2 x half> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %3 = call <4 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.v4f16(<4 x half> undef, <4 x half> undef, <4 x half> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %4 = call <8 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.v8f16(<8 x half> undef, <8 x half> undef, <8 x half> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 2 for instruction: %5 = call <16 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.v16f16(<16 x half> undef, <16 x half> undef, <16 x half> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %6 = call <vscale x 1 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv1f16(<vscale x 1 x half> undef, <vscale x 1 x half> undef, <vscale x 1 x half> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %7 = call <vscale x 2 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv2f16(<vscale x 2 x half> undef, <vscale x 2 x half> undef, <vscale x 2 x half> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %8 = call <vscale x 4 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv4f16(<vscale x 4 x half> undef, <vscale x 4 x half> undef, <vscale x 4 x half> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 2 for instruction: %9 = call <vscale x 8 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv8f16(<vscale x 8 x half> undef, <vscale x 8 x half> undef, <vscale x 8 x half> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 4 for instruction: %10 = call <vscale x 16 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.nxv16f16(<vscale x 16 x half> undef, <vscale x 16 x half> undef, <vscale x 16 x half> undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 0 for instruction: ret void
 ;
   call half @llvm.fmuladd.f16(half undef, half undef, half undef)
   call <2 x half> @llvm.fmuladd.v2f16(<2 x half> undef, <2 x half> undef, <2 x half> undef)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

⚠️ undef deprecator found issues in your code. ⚠️

You can test this locally with the following command:
git diff -U0 --pickaxe-regex -S '([^a-zA-Z0-9#_-]undef[^a-zA-Z0-9_-]|UndefValue::get)' d156b8583cb674983c2244cdb79447770383ef8d 980f5ab7cab15c208853c137f4f28d7414504992 llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVTargetTransformInfo.cpp llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/RISCV/arith-fp.ll llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/RISCV/bf16.ll llvm/test/Transforms/SLPVectorizer/RISCV/revec-getGatherCost.ll

The following files introduce new uses of undef:

  • llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/RISCV/arith-fp.ll

Undef is now deprecated and should only be used in the rare cases where no replacement is possible. For example, a load of uninitialized memory yields undef. You should use poison values for placeholders instead.

In tests, avoid using undef and having tests that trigger undefined behavior. If you need an operand with some unimportant value, you can add a new argument to the function and use that instead.

For example, this is considered a bad practice:

define void @fn() {
  ...
  br i1 undef, ...
}

Please use the following instead:

define void @fn(i1 %cond) {
  ...
  br i1 %cond, ...
}

Please refer to the Undefined Behavior Manual for more information.

Copy link
Collaborator

@preames preames left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

(When landing, please make sure to use the adjusted review description. I edited slightly for clarity.)

Copy link
Collaborator

@preames preames left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Revoking previous LGTM - per CI, change does not update all tests and fails to build. Please fix.

Signed-off-by: Mikhail R. Gadelha <[email protected]>
Copy link
Collaborator

@preames preames left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@topperc topperc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mikhailramalho mikhailramalho merged commit e78be31 into llvm:main Feb 5, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@mikhailramalho mikhailramalho deleted the fmuladd branch February 5, 2025 12:33
mikhailramalho added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2025
This change builds on PR #125683, which added a cost model for fmuladd.

To ensure completeness, this patch extends the cost model to also cover fma, using the same costing approach as fmuladd.

I plan to send a follow-up patch that includes the cost model vp_fma and vp_fmuladd, and their tests.
Icohedron pushed a commit to Icohedron/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2025
This patch updates the cost model for fmuladd on vector types to scale with LMUL. This was found when analyzing a hot loop in 519.lbm_r that was unprofitably vectorized, but doesn't directly impact that case and is split off so it doesn't get forgotten.

Unlike other FP arithmetic ops, it's not scaled by 2 because the scalar cost isn't scaled by 2.
Icohedron pushed a commit to Icohedron/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2025
This change builds on PR llvm#125683, which added a cost model for fmuladd.

To ensure completeness, this patch extends the cost model to also cover fma, using the same costing approach as fmuladd.

I plan to send a follow-up patch that includes the cost model vp_fma and vp_fmuladd, and their tests.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backend:RISC-V llvm:analysis Includes value tracking, cost tables and constant folding llvm:transforms
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants