Skip to content

[InstCombine] Extend #125676 to handle variable power of 2 #125855

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 6, 2025

Conversation

dtcxzyw
Copy link
Member

@dtcxzyw dtcxzyw commented Feb 5, 2025

@dtcxzyw dtcxzyw requested a review from nikic as a code owner February 5, 2025 13:51
@llvmbot llvmbot added llvm:instcombine Covers the InstCombine, InstSimplify and AggressiveInstCombine passes llvm:transforms labels Feb 5, 2025
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Feb 5, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms

Author: Yingwei Zheng (dtcxzyw)

Changes

Alive2: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/dJehZ8


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125855.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp (+5-5)
  • (modified) llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/xor-icmps.ll (+36)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp
index 8701f7c28a39fc..ca4d34d09c3c73 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp
@@ -4200,14 +4200,14 @@ Value *InstCombinerImpl::foldXorOfICmps(ICmpInst *LHS, ICmpInst *RHS,
 
     // Fold (icmp eq/ne (X & Pow2), 0) ^ (icmp eq/ne (Y & Pow2), 0) into
     // (icmp eq/ne ((X ^ Y) & Pow2), 0)
-    Value *X, *Y;
-    const APInt *Mask;
+    Value *X, *Y, *Mask;
     if (ICmpInst::isEquality(PredL) && ICmpInst::isEquality(PredR) &&
         LC->isZero() && RC->isZero() && LHS->hasOneUse() && RHS->hasOneUse() &&
-        match(LHS0, m_And(m_Value(X), m_Power2(Mask))) &&
-        match(RHS0, m_And(m_Value(Y), m_SpecificInt(*Mask)))) {
+        match(LHS0, m_And(m_Value(X), m_Value(Mask))) &&
+        match(RHS0, m_And(m_Value(Y), m_Specific(Mask))) &&
+        isKnownToBeAPowerOfTwo(Mask, /*OrZero=*/true, /*Depth=*/0, &I)) {
       Value *Xor = Builder.CreateXor(X, Y);
-      Value *And = Builder.CreateAnd(Xor, *Mask);
+      Value *And = Builder.CreateAnd(Xor, Mask);
       return Builder.CreateICmp(PredL == PredR ? ICmpInst::ICMP_NE
                                                : ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ,
                                 And, ConstantInt::getNullValue(Xor->getType()));
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/xor-icmps.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/xor-icmps.ll
index 382355cae7694d..55af2116aacd18 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/xor-icmps.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/xor-icmps.ll
@@ -335,6 +335,42 @@ define i1 @test_xor_of_bittest_ne_ne(i8 %x, i8 %y) {
   ret i1 %xor
 }
 
+define i1 @test_xor_of_bittest_ne_ne_var_pow2(i8 %x, i8 %y, i8 %shamt) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test_xor_of_bittest_ne_ne_var_pow2(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[POW2:%.*]] = shl nuw i8 1, [[SHAMT:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[Y:%.*]] = xor i8 [[X:%.*]], [[Y1:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[MASK2:%.*]] = and i8 [[Y]], [[POW2]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[CMP2:%.*]] = icmp ne i8 [[MASK2]], 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 [[CMP2]]
+;
+  %pow2 = shl nuw i8 1, %shamt
+  %mask1 = and i8 %x, %pow2
+  %cmp1 = icmp ne i8 %mask1, 0
+  %mask2 = and i8 %y, %pow2
+  %cmp2 = icmp ne i8 %mask2, 0
+  %xor = xor i1 %cmp1, %cmp2
+  ret i1 %xor
+}
+
+define i1 @test_xor_of_bittest_ne_ne_var_pow2_or_zero(i8 %x, i8 %y, i8 %z) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test_xor_of_bittest_ne_ne_var_pow2_or_zero(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[NZ:%.*]] = sub i8 0, [[Z:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP1:%.*]] = xor i8 [[X:%.*]], [[Y:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP2:%.*]] = and i8 [[TMP1]], [[NZ]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[MASK2:%.*]] = and i8 [[TMP2]], [[Z]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[CMP2:%.*]] = icmp ne i8 [[MASK2]], 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 [[CMP2]]
+;
+  %nz = sub i8 0, %z
+  %pow2 = and i8 %z, %nz
+  %mask1 = and i8 %x, %pow2
+  %cmp1 = icmp ne i8 %mask1, 0
+  %mask2 = and i8 %y, %pow2
+  %cmp2 = icmp ne i8 %mask2, 0
+  %xor = xor i1 %cmp1, %cmp2
+  ret i1 %xor
+}
+
 define i1 @test_xor_of_bittest_eq_eq(i8 %x, i8 %y) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @test_xor_of_bittest_eq_eq(
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[Y:%.*]] = xor i8 [[X:%.*]], [[Y1:%.*]]

Copy link
Contributor

@goldsteinn goldsteinn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -4200,14 +4200,14 @@ Value *InstCombinerImpl::foldXorOfICmps(ICmpInst *LHS, ICmpInst *RHS,

// Fold (icmp eq/ne (X & Pow2), 0) ^ (icmp eq/ne (Y & Pow2), 0) into
// (icmp eq/ne ((X ^ Y) & Pow2), 0)
Value *X, *Y;
const APInt *Mask;
Value *X, *Y, *Mask;
if (ICmpInst::isEquality(PredL) && ICmpInst::isEquality(PredR) &&
LC->isZero() && RC->isZero() && LHS->hasOneUse() && RHS->hasOneUse() &&
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can it not be beneficial to make the fold if either LHS or RHS have one use? it will result in the same amount of instructions but the other argument will have one less use.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The cmp that has one use would also need its op to have one use i.e (LHS->hasOneUse() && LHS0->hasOneUse()) || (RHS->hasOneUse() && RHS0->hasOneUse()). And that would only make it break even.

@dtcxzyw dtcxzyw merged commit 6410bdd into llvm:main Feb 6, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
@dtcxzyw dtcxzyw deleted the perf/xor-bittest-var-pow2 branch February 6, 2025 02:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
llvm:instcombine Covers the InstCombine, InstSimplify and AggressiveInstCombine passes llvm:transforms
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants