-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
Revert "SCEV: teach isImpliedViaOperations about samesign" #126506
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
artagnon
merged 1 commit into
llvm:main
from
artagnon:scev-implied-via-oper-samesign-revert
Feb 10, 2025
Merged
Revert "SCEV: teach isImpliedViaOperations about samesign" #126506
artagnon
merged 1 commit into
llvm:main
from
artagnon:scev-implied-via-oper-samesign-revert
Feb 10, 2025
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The commit f5d24e6 is buggy, and following miscompiles have been reported: llvm#126409 and llvm#124270 (comment) Revert it while we investigate.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-analysis @llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms Author: Ramkumar Ramachandra (artagnon) ChangesThe commit f5d24e6 is buggy, and following miscompiles have been reported: #126409 and Revert it while we investigate. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126506.diff 4 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
index f89887118d8d745..0d7bbe3f996408d 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
@@ -11860,13 +11860,15 @@ bool ScalarEvolution::isImpliedCondBalancedTypes(
}
// Check whether the found predicate is the same as the desired predicate.
- if (auto P = CmpPredicate::getMatching(FoundPred, Pred))
- return isImpliedCondOperands(*P, LHS, RHS, FoundLHS, FoundRHS, CtxI);
+ // FIXME: use CmpPredicate::getMatching here.
+ if (FoundPred == static_cast<CmpInst::Predicate>(Pred))
+ return isImpliedCondOperands(Pred, LHS, RHS, FoundLHS, FoundRHS, CtxI);
// Check whether swapping the found predicate makes it the same as the
// desired predicate.
- if (auto P = CmpPredicate::getMatching(
- ICmpInst::getSwappedCmpPredicate(FoundPred), Pred)) {
+ // FIXME: use CmpPredicate::getMatching here.
+ if (ICmpInst::getSwappedCmpPredicate(FoundPred) ==
+ static_cast<CmpInst::Predicate>(Pred)) {
// We can write the implication
// 0. LHS Pred RHS <- FoundLHS SwapPred FoundRHS
// using one of the following ways:
@@ -11877,23 +11879,22 @@ bool ScalarEvolution::isImpliedCondBalancedTypes(
// Forms 1. and 2. require swapping the operands of one condition. Don't
// do this if it would break canonical constant/addrec ordering.
if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(RHS) && !isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(LHS))
- return isImpliedCondOperands(ICmpInst::getSwappedCmpPredicate(*P), RHS,
- LHS, FoundLHS, FoundRHS, CtxI);
+ return isImpliedCondOperands(FoundPred, RHS, LHS, FoundLHS, FoundRHS,
+ CtxI);
if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(FoundRHS) && !isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(FoundLHS))
- return isImpliedCondOperands(*P, LHS, RHS, FoundRHS, FoundLHS, CtxI);
+ return isImpliedCondOperands(Pred, LHS, RHS, FoundRHS, FoundLHS, CtxI);
// There's no clear preference between forms 3. and 4., try both. Avoid
// forming getNotSCEV of pointer values as the resulting subtract is
// not legal.
if (!LHS->getType()->isPointerTy() && !RHS->getType()->isPointerTy() &&
- isImpliedCondOperands(ICmpInst::getSwappedCmpPredicate(*P),
- getNotSCEV(LHS), getNotSCEV(RHS), FoundLHS,
- FoundRHS, CtxI))
+ isImpliedCondOperands(FoundPred, getNotSCEV(LHS), getNotSCEV(RHS),
+ FoundLHS, FoundRHS, CtxI))
return true;
if (!FoundLHS->getType()->isPointerTy() &&
!FoundRHS->getType()->isPointerTy() &&
- isImpliedCondOperands(*P, LHS, RHS, getNotSCEV(FoundLHS),
+ isImpliedCondOperands(Pred, LHS, RHS, getNotSCEV(FoundLHS),
getNotSCEV(FoundRHS), CtxI))
return true;
@@ -12563,16 +12564,14 @@ bool ScalarEvolution::isImpliedViaOperations(CmpPredicate Pred, const SCEV *LHS,
return false;
// We only want to work with GT comparison so far.
- if (ICmpInst::isLT(Pred)) {
+ if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT) {
Pred = ICmpInst::getSwappedCmpPredicate(Pred);
std::swap(LHS, RHS);
std::swap(FoundLHS, FoundRHS);
}
- CmpInst::Predicate P = Pred.getPreferredSignedPredicate();
-
// For unsigned, try to reduce it to corresponding signed comparison.
- if (P == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT)
+ if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT)
// We can replace unsigned predicate with its signed counterpart if all
// involved values are non-negative.
// TODO: We could have better support for unsigned.
@@ -12585,10 +12584,10 @@ bool ScalarEvolution::isImpliedViaOperations(CmpPredicate Pred, const SCEV *LHS,
FoundRHS) &&
isImpliedCondOperands(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT, RHS, MinusOne, FoundLHS,
FoundRHS))
- P = ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT;
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT;
}
- if (P != ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT)
+ if (Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT)
return false;
auto GetOpFromSExt = [&](const SCEV *S) {
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/exit-count-samesign.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/exit-count-samesign.ll
index 4d569cc69fa2b11..93c6bc08af2a095 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/exit-count-samesign.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/exit-count-samesign.ll
@@ -5,9 +5,9 @@
define i32 @exit_count_samesign(i32 %iter.count, ptr %ptr) {
; CHECK-LABEL: 'exit_count_samesign'
; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @exit_count_samesign
-; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %inner.loop: backedge-taken count is {(-2 + %iter.count),+,-1}<nw><%outer.loop>
+; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %inner.loop: backedge-taken count is (-1 + (1 smax {(-1 + %iter.count)<nsw>,+,-1}<nsw><%outer.loop>))<nsw>
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %inner.loop: constant max backedge-taken count is i32 2147483646
-; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %inner.loop: symbolic max backedge-taken count is {(-2 + %iter.count),+,-1}<nw><%outer.loop>
+; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %inner.loop: symbolic max backedge-taken count is (-1 + (1 smax {(-1 + %iter.count)<nsw>,+,-1}<nsw><%outer.loop>))<nsw>
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %inner.loop: Trip multiple is 1
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %outer.loop: <multiple exits> Unpredictable backedge-taken count.
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %outer.loop: Unpredictable constant max backedge-taken count.
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/implied-via-division.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/implied-via-division.ll
index d83301243ef30bd..a1d30406095ec58 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/implied-via-division.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/implied-via-division.ll
@@ -2,10 +2,12 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -disable-output -passes="print<scalar-evolution>" \
; RUN: -scalar-evolution-classify-expressions=0 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
-define void @implied1(i32 %n) {
-; Prove that (n s> 1) ===> (n / 2 s> 0).
-; CHECK-LABEL: 'implied1'
-; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @implied1
+declare void @llvm.experimental.guard(i1, ...)
+
+define void @test_1(i32 %n) nounwind {
+; Prove that (n > 1) ===> (n / 2 > 0).
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'test_1'
+; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @test_1
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: backedge-taken count is (-1 + %n.div.2)<nsw>
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: constant max backedge-taken count is i32 1073741822
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: symbolic max backedge-taken count is (-1 + %n.div.2)<nsw>
@@ -27,35 +29,10 @@ exit:
ret void
}
-define void @implied1_samesign(i32 %n) {
-; Prove that (n > 1) ===> (n / 2 s> 0).
-; CHECK-LABEL: 'implied1_samesign'
-; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @implied1_samesign
-; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: backedge-taken count is (-1 + %n.div.2)<nsw>
-; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: constant max backedge-taken count is i32 1073741822
-; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: symbolic max backedge-taken count is (-1 + %n.div.2)<nsw>
-; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: Trip multiple is 1
-;
-entry:
- %cmp1 = icmp samesign ugt i32 %n, 1
- %n.div.2 = sdiv i32 %n, 2
- call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp1)
- br label %header
-
-header:
- %indvar = phi i32 [ %indvar.next, %header ], [ 0, %entry ]
- %indvar.next = add i32 %indvar, 1
- %exitcond = icmp sgt i32 %n.div.2, %indvar.next
- br i1 %exitcond, label %header, label %exit
-
-exit:
- ret void
-}
-
-define void @implied1_neg(i32 %n) {
-; Prove that (n s> 0) =\=> (n / 2 s> 0).
-; CHECK-LABEL: 'implied1_neg'
-; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @implied1_neg
+define void @test_1neg(i32 %n) nounwind {
+; Prove that (n > 0) =\=> (n / 2 > 0).
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'test_1neg'
+; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @test_1neg
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: backedge-taken count is (-1 + (1 smax %n.div.2))<nsw>
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: constant max backedge-taken count is i32 1073741822
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: symbolic max backedge-taken count is (-1 + (1 smax %n.div.2))<nsw>
@@ -77,10 +54,10 @@ exit:
ret void
}
-define void @implied2(i32 %n) {
-; Prove that (n s>= 2) ===> (n / 2 s> 0).
-; CHECK-LABEL: 'implied2'
-; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @implied2
+define void @test_2(i32 %n) nounwind {
+; Prove that (n >= 2) ===> (n / 2 > 0).
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'test_2'
+; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @test_2
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: backedge-taken count is (-1 + %n.div.2)<nsw>
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: constant max backedge-taken count is i32 1073741822
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: symbolic max backedge-taken count is (-1 + %n.div.2)<nsw>
@@ -102,35 +79,10 @@ exit:
ret void
}
-define void @implied2_samesign(i32 %n) {
-; Prove that (n >= 2) ===> (n / 2 s> 0).
-; CHECK-LABEL: 'implied2_samesign'
-; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @implied2_samesign
-; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: backedge-taken count is (-1 + (1 smax %n.div.2))<nsw>
-; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: constant max backedge-taken count is i32 1073741822
-; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: symbolic max backedge-taken count is (-1 + (1 smax %n.div.2))<nsw>
-; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: Trip multiple is 1
-;
-entry:
- %cmp1 = icmp samesign uge i32 %n, 2
- %n.div.2 = sdiv i32 %n, 2
- call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp1)
- br label %header
-
-header:
- %indvar = phi i32 [ %indvar.next, %header ], [ 0, %entry ]
- %indvar.next = add i32 %indvar, 1
- %exitcond = icmp sgt i32 %n.div.2, %indvar.next
- br i1 %exitcond, label %header, label %exit
-
-exit:
- ret void
-}
-
-define void @implied2_neg(i32 %n) {
-; Prove that (n s>= 1) =\=> (n / 2 s> 0).
-; CHECK-LABEL: 'implied2_neg'
-; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @implied2_neg
+define void @test_2neg(i32 %n) nounwind {
+; Prove that (n >= 1) =\=> (n / 2 > 0).
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'test_2neg'
+; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @test_2neg
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: backedge-taken count is (-1 + (1 smax %n.div.2))<nsw>
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: constant max backedge-taken count is i32 1073741822
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: symbolic max backedge-taken count is (-1 + (1 smax %n.div.2))<nsw>
@@ -152,10 +104,10 @@ exit:
ret void
}
-define void @implied3(i32 %n) {
-; Prove that (n s> -2) ===> (n / 2 s>= 0).
-; CHECK-LABEL: 'implied3'
-; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @implied3
+define void @test_3(i32 %n) nounwind {
+; Prove that (n > -2) ===> (n / 2 >= 0).
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'test_3'
+; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @test_3
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: backedge-taken count is (1 + %n.div.2)<nsw>
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: constant max backedge-taken count is i32 1073741824
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: symbolic max backedge-taken count is (1 + %n.div.2)<nsw>
@@ -177,35 +129,10 @@ exit:
ret void
}
-define void @implied3_samesign(i32 %n) {
-; Prove that (n > -2) ===> (n / 2 s>= 0).
-; CHECK-LABEL: 'implied3_samesign'
-; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @implied3_samesign
-; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: backedge-taken count is (1 + %n.div.2)<nsw>
-; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: constant max backedge-taken count is i32 1
-; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: symbolic max backedge-taken count is (1 + %n.div.2)<nsw>
-; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: Trip multiple is 1
-;
-entry:
- %cmp1 = icmp samesign ugt i32 %n, -2
- %n.div.2 = sdiv i32 %n, 2
- call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp1)
- br label %header
-
-header:
- %indvar = phi i32 [ %indvar.next, %header ], [ 0, %entry ]
- %indvar.next = add i32 %indvar, 1
- %exitcond = icmp sge i32 %n.div.2, %indvar
- br i1 %exitcond, label %header, label %exit
-
-exit:
- ret void
-}
-
-define void @implied3_neg(i32 %n) {
+define void @test_3neg(i32 %n) nounwind {
; Prove that (n > -3) =\=> (n / 2 >= 0).
-; CHECK-LABEL: 'implied3_neg'
-; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @implied3_neg
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'test_3neg'
+; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @test_3neg
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: backedge-taken count is (0 smax (1 + %n.div.2)<nsw>)
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: constant max backedge-taken count is i32 1073741824
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: symbolic max backedge-taken count is (0 smax (1 + %n.div.2)<nsw>)
@@ -227,10 +154,10 @@ exit:
ret void
}
-define void @implied4(i32 %n) {
-; Prove that (n s>= -1) ===> (n / 2 s>= 0).
-; CHECK-LABEL: 'implied4'
-; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @implied4
+define void @test_4(i32 %n) nounwind {
+; Prove that (n >= -1) ===> (n / 2 >= 0).
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'test_4'
+; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @test_4
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: backedge-taken count is (1 + %n.div.2)<nsw>
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: constant max backedge-taken count is i32 1073741824
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: symbolic max backedge-taken count is (1 + %n.div.2)<nsw>
@@ -252,35 +179,10 @@ exit:
ret void
}
-define void @implied4_samesign(i32 %n) {
-; Prove that (n >= -1) ===> (n / 2 s>= 0).
-; CHECK-LABEL: 'implied4_samesign'
-; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @implied4_samesign
-; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: backedge-taken count is (1 + %n.div.2)<nsw>
-; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: constant max backedge-taken count is i32 1
-; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: symbolic max backedge-taken count is (1 + %n.div.2)<nsw>
-; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: Trip multiple is 1
-;
-entry:
- %cmp1 = icmp samesign uge i32 %n, -1
- %n.div.2 = sdiv i32 %n, 2
- call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp1)
- br label %header
-
-header:
- %indvar = phi i32 [ %indvar.next, %header ], [ 0, %entry ]
- %indvar.next = add i32 %indvar, 1
- %exitcond = icmp sge i32 %n.div.2, %indvar
- br i1 %exitcond, label %header, label %exit
-
-exit:
- ret void
-}
-
-define void @implied4_neg(i32 %n) {
-; Prove that (n s>= -2) =\=> (n / 2 s>= 0).
-; CHECK-LABEL: 'implied4_neg'
-; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @implied4_neg
+define void @test_4neg(i32 %n) nounwind {
+; Prove that (n >= -2) =\=> (n / 2 >= 0).
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'test_4neg'
+; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @test_4neg
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: backedge-taken count is (0 smax (1 + %n.div.2)<nsw>)
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: constant max backedge-taken count is i32 1073741824
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %header: symbolic max backedge-taken count is (0 smax (1 + %n.div.2)<nsw>)
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/iv-ext-samesign.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/iv-ext-samesign.ll
index c4e26c98ed24a6a..1207f47c5e3c90c 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/iv-ext-samesign.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/iv-ext-samesign.ll
@@ -68,32 +68,28 @@ define i32 @iv_zext_zext_gt_slt(i32 %iter.count, ptr %ptr) {
; CHECK-LABEL: define i32 @iv_zext_zext_gt_slt(
; CHECK-SAME: i32 [[ITER_COUNT:%.*]], ptr [[PTR:%.*]]) {
; CHECK-NEXT: [[ENTRY:.*]]:
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP0:%.*]] = add nsw i32 [[ITER_COUNT]], -1
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP0:%.*]] = sext i32 [[ITER_COUNT]] to i64
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[OUTER_LOOP:.*]]
; CHECK: [[PH_LOOPEXIT:.*]]:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[PH:.*]]
; CHECK: [[PH]]:
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT3:%.*]] = add i32 [[INDVARS_IV1:%.*]], -1
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[OUTER_LOOP]]
; CHECK: [[OUTER_LOOP]]:
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[INDVARS_IV1]] = phi i32 [ [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT3]], %[[PH]] ], [ [[TMP0]], %[[ENTRY]] ]
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV_OUTER:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[IV_OUTER_1:%.*]], %[[PH]] ], [ [[ITER_COUNT]], %[[ENTRY]] ]
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV_OUTER_1]] = add nsw i32 [[IV_OUTER]], -1
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT2:%.*]] = zext nneg i32 [[IV_OUTER_1]] to i64
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[INDVARS_IV1:%.*]] = phi i64 [ [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT2:%.*]], %[[PH]] ], [ [[TMP0]], %[[ENTRY]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT2]] = add nsw i64 [[INDVARS_IV1]], -1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[GEP_OUTER:%.*]] = getelementptr i8, ptr [[PTR]], i64 [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT2]]
; CHECK-NEXT: store i8 0, ptr [[GEP_OUTER]], align 1
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[EXIT_COND_OUTER:%.*]] = icmp samesign ugt i32 [[IV_OUTER]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[EXIT_COND_OUTER:%.*]] = icmp samesign ugt i64 [[INDVARS_IV1]], 1
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[EXIT_COND_OUTER]], label %[[INNER_LOOP_PREHEADER:.*]], label %[[PH]]
; CHECK: [[INNER_LOOP_PREHEADER]]:
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[WIDE_TRIP_COUNT:%.*]] = zext i32 [[INDVARS_IV1]] to i64
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[INNER_LOOP:.*]]
; CHECK: [[INNER_LOOP]]:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[INDVARS_IV:%.*]] = phi i64 [ 0, %[[INNER_LOOP_PREHEADER]] ], [ [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT:%.*]], %[[INNER_LOOP]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[GEP_INNER:%.*]] = getelementptr i8, ptr [[PTR]], i64 [[INDVARS_IV]]
; CHECK-NEXT: store i8 0, ptr [[GEP_INNER]], align 1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT]] = add nuw nsw i64 [[INDVARS_IV]], 1
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[EXITCOND:%.*]] = icmp ne i64 [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT]], [[WIDE_TRIP_COUNT]]
-; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[EXITCOND]], label %[[INNER_LOOP]], label %[[PH_LOOPEXIT]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[EXIT_COND_INNER:%.*]] = icmp slt i64 [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT]], [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT2]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[EXIT_COND_INNER]], label %[[INNER_LOOP]], label %[[PH_LOOPEXIT]]
; CHECK: [[EXIT:.*:]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 0
;
@@ -428,32 +424,28 @@ define i32 @iv_sext_sext_gt_slt(i32 %iter.count, ptr %ptr) {
; CHECK-LABEL: define i32 @iv_sext_sext_gt_slt(
; CHECK-SAME: i32 [[ITER_COUNT:%.*]], ptr [[PTR:%.*]]) {
; CHECK-NEXT: [[ENTRY:.*]]:
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = add nsw i32 [[ITER_COUNT]], -1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP0:%.*]] = sext i32 [[ITER_COUNT]] to i64
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[OUTER_LOOP:.*]]
; CHECK: [[PH_LOOPEXIT:.*]]:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[PH:.*]]
; CHECK: [[PH]]:
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT3:%.*]] = add i32 [[INDVARS_IV2:%.*]], -1
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[OUTER_LOOP]]
; CHECK: [[OUTER_LOOP]]:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[INDVARS_IV1:%.*]] = phi i64 [ [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT2:%.*]], %[[PH]] ], [ [[TMP0]], %[[ENTRY]] ]
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[INDVARS_IV2]] = phi i32 [ [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT3]], %[[PH]] ], [ [[TMP1]], %[[ENTRY]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT2]] = add nsw i64 [[INDVARS_IV1]], -1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[GEP_OUTER:%.*]] = getelementptr i8, ptr [[PTR]], i64 [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT2]]
; CHECK-NEXT: store i8 0, ptr [[GEP_OUTER]], align 1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[EXIT_COND_OUTER:%.*]] = icmp samesign ugt i64 [[INDVARS_IV1]], 1
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[EXIT_COND_OUTER]], label %[[INNER_LOOP_PREHEADER:.*]], label %[[PH]]
; CHECK: [[INNER_LOOP_PREHEADER]]:
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[WIDE_TRIP_COUNT:%.*]] = zext i32 [[INDVARS_IV2]] to i64
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[INNER_LOOP:.*]]
; CHECK: [[INNER_LOOP]]:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[INDVARS_IV:%.*]] = phi i64 [ 0, %[[INNER_LOOP_PREHEADER]] ], [ [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT:%.*]], %[[INNER_LOOP]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[GEP_INNER:%.*]] = getelementptr i8, ptr [[PTR]], i64 [[INDVARS_IV]]
; CHECK-NEXT: store i8 0, ptr [[GEP_INNER]], align 1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT]] = add nuw nsw i64 [[INDVARS_IV]], 1
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[EXITCOND:%.*]] = icmp ne i64 [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT]], [[WIDE_TRIP_COUNT]]
-; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[EXITCOND]], label %[[INNER_LOOP]], label %[[PH_LOOPEXIT]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[EXIT_COND_INNER:%.*]] = icmp slt i64 [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT]], [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT2]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[EXIT_COND_INNER]], label %[[INNER_LOOP]], label %[[PH_LOOPEXIT]]
; CHECK: [[EXIT:.*:]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 0
;
|
nikic
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2025
Icohedron
pushed a commit
to Icohedron/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2025
The commit f5d24e6 is buggy, and following miscompiles have been reported: llvm#126409 and llvm#124270 (comment) Revert it while we investigate.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The commit f5d24e6 is buggy, and following miscompiles have been reported: #126409 and
#124270 (comment)
Revert it while we investigate.