Skip to content

[lldb] Fix build problem in llgs tests for RISC-V #127091

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

sga-sc
Copy link
Contributor

@sga-sc sga-sc commented Feb 13, 2025

During testing of LLDB on RISC-V target, tests from the llgs category were built with an error: Error when building test subject.

llvm-project/lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server/main.cpp:151:40: error: missing ')' after '__builtin_debugtrap'
  151 | #elif __has_builtin(__builtin_debugtrap())
      |                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
llvm-project/lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server/main.cpp:151:20: note: to match this '('
  151 | #elif __has_builtin(__builtin_debugtrap())
      |                    ^

This patch fixes this error.

@sga-sc sga-sc requested a review from JDevlieghere as a code owner February 13, 2025 16:38
Copy link

Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!

This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.

If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page.

If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using @ followed by their GitHub username.

If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers.

If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide.

You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums.

@llvmbot llvmbot added the lldb label Feb 13, 2025
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Feb 13, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb

Author: None (sga-sc)

Changes

During testing of LLDB on RISC-V target, tests from the llgs category were built with an error: Error when building test subject.

llvm-project/lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server/main.cpp:151:40: error: missing ')' after '__builtin_debugtrap'
  151 | #elif __has_builtin(__builtin_debugtrap())
      |                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
llvm-project/lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server/main.cpp:151:20: note: to match this '('
  151 | #elif __has_builtin(__builtin_debugtrap())
      |                    ^

This patch fixes this error.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127091.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server/main.cpp (+1-1)
diff --git a/lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server/main.cpp b/lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server/main.cpp
index 5d33ee6e1b0ba..484da8aa4bef9 100644
--- a/lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server/main.cpp
+++ b/lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server/main.cpp
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static void trap() {
   asm volatile("udf #254");
 #elif defined(__powerpc__)
   asm volatile("trap");
-#elif __has_builtin(__builtin_debugtrap())
+#elif __has_builtin(__builtin_debugtrap)
   __builtin_debugtrap();
 #else
 #warning Don't know how to generate a trap. Some tests may fail.

Copy link
Collaborator

@DavidSpickett DavidSpickett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct according to https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/_005f_005fhas_005fbuiltin.html, thanks for the fix.

@DavidSpickett DavidSpickett merged commit 1138a49 into llvm:main Feb 13, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
Copy link

@sga-sc Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project!

Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested by our build bots. If there is a problem with a build, you may receive a report in an email or a comment on this PR.

Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as the builds can include changes from many authors. It is not uncommon for your change to be included in a build that fails due to someone else's changes, or infrastructure issues.

How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here.

If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. This is a normal part of LLVM development. You can fix your changes and open a new PR to merge them again.

If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done!

joaosaffran pushed a commit to joaosaffran/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
During testing of LLDB on RISC-V target, tests from the llgs category
were built with an error: `Error when building test subject.`

```
llvm-project/lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server/main.cpp:151:40: error: missing ')' after '__builtin_debugtrap'
  151 | #elif __has_builtin(__builtin_debugtrap())
      |                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
llvm-project/lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server/main.cpp:151:20: note: to match this '('
  151 | #elif __has_builtin(__builtin_debugtrap())
      |                    ^
```

This patch fixes this error.
sivan-shani pushed a commit to sivan-shani/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
During testing of LLDB on RISC-V target, tests from the llgs category
were built with an error: `Error when building test subject.`

```
llvm-project/lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server/main.cpp:151:40: error: missing ')' after '__builtin_debugtrap'
  151 | #elif __has_builtin(__builtin_debugtrap())
      |                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
llvm-project/lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server/main.cpp:151:20: note: to match this '('
  151 | #elif __has_builtin(__builtin_debugtrap())
      |                    ^
```

This patch fixes this error.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants