Skip to content

PeepholeOpt: Remove dead checks for subregister def mismatch #130084

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 1 addition & 4 deletions llvm/lib/CodeGen/PeepholeOptimizer.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1904,11 +1904,8 @@ ValueTrackerResult ValueTracker::getNextSourceFromCopy() {
assert(Def->getNumOperands() - Def->getNumImplicitOperands() == 2 &&
"Invalid number of operands");
assert(!Def->hasImplicitDef() && "Only implicit uses are allowed");
assert(!Def->getOperand(DefIdx).getSubReg() && "no subregister defs in SSA");

if (Def->getOperand(DefIdx).getSubReg() != DefSubReg)
// If we look for a different subreg, it means we want a subreg of src.
// Bails as we do not support composing subregs yet.
return ValueTrackerResult();
// Otherwise, we want the whole source.
const MachineOperand &Src = Def->getOperand(1);
if (Src.isUndef())
Expand Down
Loading