-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[CIR] Upstream basic support for sizeof and alignof #130847
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CIR] Upstream basic support for sizeof and alignof #130847
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang @llvm/pr-subscribers-clangir Author: Amr Hesham (AmrDeveloper) ChangesThis change adds the essential support for sizeof and alignof operators
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130847.diff 3 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/lib/CIR/CodeGen/CIRGenExprScalar.cpp b/clang/lib/CIR/CodeGen/CIRGenExprScalar.cpp
index b9e56dc4123d6..19d57ed9cf6fa 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CIR/CodeGen/CIRGenExprScalar.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CIR/CodeGen/CIRGenExprScalar.cpp
@@ -92,6 +92,8 @@ class ScalarExprEmitter : public StmtVisitor<ScalarExprEmitter, mlir::Value> {
mlir::Value VisitCastExpr(CastExpr *E);
+ mlir::Value VisitUnaryExprOrTypeTraitExpr(const UnaryExprOrTypeTraitExpr *e);
+
/// Emit a conversion from the specified type to the specified destination
/// type, both of which are CIR scalar types.
/// TODO: do we need ScalarConversionOpts here? Should be done in another
@@ -148,3 +150,27 @@ mlir::Value ScalarExprEmitter::VisitCastExpr(CastExpr *ce) {
}
return {};
}
+
+/// Return the size or alignment of the type of argument of the sizeof
+/// expression as an integer.
+mlir::Value ScalarExprEmitter::VisitUnaryExprOrTypeTraitExpr(
+ const UnaryExprOrTypeTraitExpr *e) {
+ const QualType typeToSize = e->getTypeOfArgument();
+ if (e->getKind() == UETT_SizeOf) {
+ if (const VariableArrayType *variableArrTy =
+ cgf.getContext().getAsVariableArrayType(typeToSize)) {
+ cgf.getCIRGenModule().errorNYI(e->getSourceRange(),
+ "sizeof operator for VariableArrayType",
+ e->getStmtClassName());
+ }
+ } else if (e->getKind() == UETT_OpenMPRequiredSimdAlign) {
+ cgf.getCIRGenModule().errorNYI(
+ e->getSourceRange(),
+ "sizeof operator for Not yet implemented: ", e->getStmtClassName());
+ }
+
+ return builder.create<cir::ConstantOp>(
+ cgf.getLoc(e->getSourceRange()), cgf.cgm.UInt64Ty,
+ builder.getAttr<cir::IntAttr>(
+ cgf.cgm.UInt64Ty, e->EvaluateKnownConstInt(cgf.getContext())));
+}
diff --git a/clang/test/CIR/CodeGen/unary-expr-or-type-trait.cpp b/clang/test/CIR/CodeGen/unary-expr-or-type-trait.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..e1868d99c42b6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/CIR/CodeGen/unary-expr-or-type-trait.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -fclangir -emit-cir %s -o - 2>&1 | filecheck %s
+
+void foo() {
+ unsigned long b = sizeof(bool);
+ // CHECK: cir.const #cir.int<1> : !cir.int<u, 64>
+
+ unsigned long i = sizeof(int);
+ // CHECK: cir.const #cir.int<4> : !cir.int<u, 64>
+
+ unsigned long l = sizeof(long);
+ // CHECK: cir.const #cir.int<8> : !cir.int<u, 64>
+
+ unsigned long f = sizeof(float);
+ // CHECK: cir.const #cir.int<4> : !cir.int<u, 64>
+
+ unsigned long d = sizeof(double);
+ // CHECK: cir.const #cir.int<8> : !cir.int<u, 64>
+}
+
+void foo2() {
+ unsigned long b = alignof(bool);
+ // CHECK: cir.const #cir.int<1> : !cir.int<u, 64>
+
+ unsigned long i = alignof(int);
+ // CHECK: cir.const #cir.int<4> : !cir.int<u, 64>
+
+ unsigned long l = alignof(long);
+ // CHECK: cir.const #cir.int<8> : !cir.int<u, 64>
+
+ unsigned long f = alignof(float);
+ // CHECK: cir.const #cir.int<4> : !cir.int<u, 64>
+
+ unsigned long d = alignof(double);
+ // CHECK: cir.const #cir.int<8> : !cir.int<u, 64>
+}
diff --git a/clang/test/CIR/Lowering/unary-expr-or-type-trait.cpp b/clang/test/CIR/Lowering/unary-expr-or-type-trait.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..551a1c254216b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/CIR/Lowering/unary-expr-or-type-trait.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -fclangir -emit-llvm %s -o - 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+void foo() {
+ unsigned long b = sizeof(bool);
+ // CHECK: store i64 1, ptr {{%.*}}, align 4
+
+ unsigned long i = sizeof(int);
+ // CHECK: store i64 4, ptr {{%.*}}, align 4
+
+ unsigned long l = sizeof(long);
+ // CHECK: store i64 8, ptr {{%.*}}, align 4
+
+ unsigned long f = sizeof(float);
+ // CHECK: store i64 4, ptr {{%.*}}, align 4
+
+ unsigned long d = sizeof(double);
+ // CHECK: store i64 8, ptr {{%.*}}, align 4
+}
+
+void foo2() {
+ unsigned long b = alignof(bool);
+ // CHECK: store i64 1, ptr {{%.*}}, align 4
+
+ unsigned long i = alignof(int);
+ // CHECK: store i64 4, ptr {{%.*}}, align 4
+
+ unsigned long l = alignof(long);
+ // CHECK: store i64 8, ptr {{%.*}}, align 4
+
+ unsigned long f = alignof(float);
+ // CHECK: store i64 4, ptr {{%.*}}, align 4
+
+ unsigned long d = alignof(double);
+ // CHECK: store i64 8, ptr {{%.*}}, align 4
+}
|
mlir::Value ScalarExprEmitter::VisitUnaryExprOrTypeTraitExpr( | ||
const UnaryExprOrTypeTraitExpr *e) { | ||
const QualType typeToSize = e->getTypeOfArgument(); | ||
if (e->getKind() == UETT_SizeOf) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See here:
llvm-project/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp
Line 3471 in dc23234
ScalarExprEmitter::VisitUnaryExprOrTypeTraitExpr( |
This is missing A LOT of those things it needs. I think this function needs more work (even if it is just NYI).
if (e->getKind() == UETT_SizeOf) { | ||
if (const VariableArrayType *variableArrTy = | ||
cgf.getContext().getAsVariableArrayType(typeToSize)) { | ||
cgf.getCIRGenModule().errorNYI(e->getSourceRange(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How is this recovering? Will there be a known-const-int in this case to give a valid value? Same on 169.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will check EvaluateKnownConstInt
and create a dummy value for recovering
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think instead that after each of these errorNYI
diagnostics, we are better just returning a constant value that is reasonably sensible. A 1
or a ptr-size
both seem reasonable to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice i used 1 as recovering value for unimplemented yet cases
…nto cir_upstream_sizeof_alignof
I updated the test to include fixed size ArrayType |
This change adds the essential support for sizeof and alignof operators