Skip to content

[libc++] Remove the explicit Clang/LSV CI job #131667

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

ldionne
Copy link
Member

@ldionne ldionne commented Mar 17, 2025

Recent versions of Clang now enable LSV by default when building with modules enabled and C++20 and later. Since our CI job runs with the latest Standard, explicitly specifying LSV is redundant and doesn't add any additional coverage.

Recent versions of Clang now enable LSV by default when building with
modules enabled and C++20 and later. Since our CI job runs with the
latest Standard, explicitly specifying LSV is redundant and doesn't add
any additional coverage.
@ldionne ldionne requested a review from a team as a code owner March 17, 2025 20:21
@llvmbot llvmbot added libc++ libc++ C++ Standard Library. Not GNU libstdc++. Not libc++abi. github:workflow labels Mar 17, 2025
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Mar 17, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx

@llvm/pr-subscribers-github-workflow

Author: Louis Dionne (ldionne)

Changes

Recent versions of Clang now enable LSV by default when building with modules enabled and C++20 and later. Since our CI job runs with the latest Standard, explicitly specifying LSV is redundant and doesn't add any additional coverage.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131667.diff

4 Files Affected:

  • (modified) .github/workflows/libcxx-build-and-test.yaml (-1)
  • (removed) libcxx/cmake/caches/Generic-modules-lsv.cmake (-2)
  • (modified) libcxx/utils/ci/run-buildbot (-6)
  • (modified) libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/params.py (+7-8)
diff --git a/.github/workflows/libcxx-build-and-test.yaml b/.github/workflows/libcxx-build-and-test.yaml
index 8c011425abfcf..6b4e791369d50 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/libcxx-build-and-test.yaml
+++ b/.github/workflows/libcxx-build-and-test.yaml
@@ -137,7 +137,6 @@ jobs:
           'generic-hardening-mode-fast',
           'generic-hardening-mode-fast-with-abi-breaks',
           'generic-merged',
-          'generic-modules-lsv',
           'generic-no-exceptions',
           'generic-no-experimental',
           'generic-no-filesystem',
diff --git a/libcxx/cmake/caches/Generic-modules-lsv.cmake b/libcxx/cmake/caches/Generic-modules-lsv.cmake
deleted file mode 100644
index 395fccc217650..0000000000000
--- a/libcxx/cmake/caches/Generic-modules-lsv.cmake
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
-set(LIBCXX_TEST_PARAMS "enable_modules=clang-lsv" CACHE STRING "")
-set(LIBCXXABI_TEST_PARAMS "${LIBCXX_TEST_PARAMS}" CACHE STRING "")
diff --git a/libcxx/utils/ci/run-buildbot b/libcxx/utils/ci/run-buildbot
index 947932f3802a1..6fc6c8b658ede 100755
--- a/libcxx/utils/ci/run-buildbot
+++ b/libcxx/utils/ci/run-buildbot
@@ -454,12 +454,6 @@ generic-modules)
     check-runtimes
     check-abi-list
 ;;
-generic-modules-lsv)
-    clean
-    generate-cmake -C "${MONOREPO_ROOT}/libcxx/cmake/caches/Generic-modules-lsv.cmake"
-    check-runtimes
-    check-abi-list
-;;
 #
 # Parts removed
 #
diff --git a/libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/params.py b/libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/params.py
index 93dc3a8be3f08..ace4630472b6b 100644
--- a/libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/params.py
+++ b/libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/params.py
@@ -207,24 +207,23 @@ def getSuitableClangTidy(cfg):
     ),
     Parameter(
         name="enable_modules",
-        choices=["none", "clang", "clang-lsv"],
+        choices=["none", "clang"],
         type=str,
-        help="Whether to build the test suite with modules enabled. "
-             "Select `clang` for Clang modules, and 'clang-lsv' for Clang modules with Local Submodule Visibility.",
+        help="Whether to build the test suite with Clang modules enabled. Select `clang` for Clang modules, and "
+             "'none' for a non-modular build. Note that recent versions of Clang enable Local Submodule Visibility "
+             "by default in C++20 and later.",
         default="none",
         actions=lambda modules: filter(None, [
-            AddFeature("clang-modules-build")           if modules in ("clang", "clang-lsv") else None,
+            AddFeature("clang-modules-build")           if modules == "clang" else None,
 
             # Note: AppleClang disregards -fmodules entirely when compiling C++, so we also pass -fcxx-modules
             #       to enable modules for C++.
-            AddCompileFlag("-fmodules -fcxx-modules")   if modules in ("clang", "clang-lsv") else None,
+            AddCompileFlag("-fmodules -fcxx-modules")   if modules == "clang") else None,
 
             # Note: We use a custom modules cache path to make sure that we don't reuse
             #       the default one, which can be shared across CI builds with different
             #       configurations.
-            AddCompileFlag(lambda cfg: f"-fmodules-cache-path={cfg.test_exec_root}/ModuleCache") if modules in ("clang", "clang-lsv") else None,
-
-            AddCompileFlag("-Xclang -fmodules-local-submodule-visibility") if modules == "clang-lsv" else None,
+            AddCompileFlag(lambda cfg: f"-fmodules-cache-path={cfg.test_exec_root}/ModuleCache") if modules == "clang" else None,
         ])
     ),
     Parameter(

@ian-twilightcoder
Copy link
Contributor

Should we do this? #127015 only reproduces with C++17 and LSV.

@ldionne
Copy link
Member Author

ldionne commented Mar 18, 2025

No, you're right, I think we should instead switch the LSV job to use C++17 instead of C++23 to get back our coverage.

@ldionne ldionne closed this Mar 18, 2025
@ldionne ldionne deleted the review/remove-lsv-specific-job branch March 18, 2025 13:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
github:workflow libc++ libc++ C++ Standard Library. Not GNU libstdc++. Not libc++abi.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants