-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
libcxx: In gdb test detect execute_mi with feature check instead of version check. #132291
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
libcxx: In gdb test detect execute_mi with feature check instead of version check. #132291
Conversation
Created using spr 1.3.6-beta.1
Created using spr 1.3.6-beta.1 [skip ci]
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx Author: Peter Collingbourne (pcc) ChangesThe existing version check can lead to test failures on some distribution Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132291.diff 1 Files Affected:
|
✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code formatter. |
Created using spr 1.3.6-beta.1 [skip ci]
Created using spr 1.3.6-beta.1 [skip ci]
Created using spr 1.3.6-beta.1
Ping @ldionne |
Is it documented somewhere that you're allowed to use |
Created using spr 1.3.6-beta.1
I guess |
It looks like your merge base is wrong. |
That's just what spr does, it will be applied onto main when it lands.
…On Tue, Apr 8, 2025, 23:52 Nikolas Klauser ***@***.***> wrote:
It looks like your merge base is wrong.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#132291 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADHYQB3BL4FF3UGLJZJXK32YS7T3AVCNFSM6AAAAABZORGEPWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDOOBYGUYTAOBYGM>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
*philnik777* left a comment (llvm/llvm-project#132291)
<#132291 (comment)>
It looks like your merge base is wrong.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#132291 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADHYQB3BL4FF3UGLJZJXK32YS7T3AVCNFSM6AAAAABZORGEPWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDOOBYGUYTAOBYGM>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Could you not use spr in that case? I can't see the diff as it would be merged AFAICT. |
Odd, if I go to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132291/files in
an incognito tab it just looks like this to me and that's what would be
applied.
…On Wed, Apr 9, 2025, 00:03 Nikolas Klauser ***@***.***> wrote:
Could you not use spr in that case? I can't see the diff as it would be
merged AFAICT.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#132291 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADHYQCKMPOMQS2VXD4L5PL2YTA3RAVCNFSM6AAAAABZORGEPWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDOOBYGU2DGNJZGE>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
*philnik777* left a comment (llvm/llvm-project#132291)
<#132291 (comment)>
Could you not use spr in that case? I can't see the diff as it would be
merged AFAICT.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#132291 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADHYQCKMPOMQS2VXD4L5PL2YTA3RAVCNFSM6AAAAABZORGEPWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDOOBYGU2DGNJZGE>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
@philnik777 FWIW I also see a normal diff in the webui. |
Created using spr 1.3.6-beta.1 [skip ci]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM assuming the diff landed is the same I see. I'm really not a fan of complicating things unnecessarily though.
Created using spr 1.3.6-beta.1 [skip ci]
…nstead of version check. The existing version check can lead to test failures on some distribution packages of gdb where not all components of the version number are integers, such as Fedora where gdb.VERSION can be something like "15.2-4.fc41". Fix it by replacing the version check with a feature check. Reviewers: philnik777 Reviewed By: philnik777 Pull Request: llvm/llvm-project#132291
…ersion check. The existing version check can lead to test failures on some distribution packages of gdb where not all components of the version number are integers, such as Fedora where gdb.VERSION can be something like "15.2-4.fc41". Fix it by replacing the version check with a feature check. Reviewers: philnik777 Reviewed By: philnik777 Pull Request: llvm#132291
The existing version check can lead to test failures on some distribution
packages of gdb where not all components of the version number are
integers, such as Fedora where gdb.VERSION can be something like
"15.2-4.fc41". Fix it by replacing the version check with a feature check.