-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[libc++][test] Small fixes for time tests #132532
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Comparing the `#if` to the `#else` case, it's clear that this half-copied check should be removed.
It's only used within `LIBCPP_STATIC_ASSERT`.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx Author: Stephan T. Lavavej (StephanTLavavej) Changes
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132532.diff 3 Files Affected:
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/time/time.clock/time.clock.gps/types.compile.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/time/time.clock/time.clock.gps/types.compile.pass.cpp
index af95c5fe73402..006ad9a2d243e 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/time/time.clock/time.clock.gps/types.compile.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/time/time.clock/time.clock.gps/types.compile.pass.cpp
@@ -36,11 +36,11 @@
#include "test_macros.h"
// class gps_clock
-using rep = std::chrono::gps_clock::rep;
-using period = std::chrono::gps_clock::period;
-using duration = std::chrono::gps_clock::duration;
-using time_point = std::chrono::gps_clock::time_point;
-constexpr bool is_steady = std::chrono::gps_clock::is_steady;
+using rep = std::chrono::gps_clock::rep;
+using period = std::chrono::gps_clock::period;
+using duration = std::chrono::gps_clock::duration;
+using time_point = std::chrono::gps_clock::time_point;
+[[maybe_unused]] constexpr bool is_steady = std::chrono::gps_clock::is_steady;
// Tests the values. part of them are implementation defined.
LIBCPP_STATIC_ASSERT(std::same_as<rep, std::chrono::utc_clock::rep>);
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/time/time.clock/time.clock.tai/types.compile.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/time/time.clock/time.clock.tai/types.compile.pass.cpp
index ddb057333f49a..a7123bc3e0b5c 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/time/time.clock/time.clock.tai/types.compile.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/time/time.clock/time.clock.tai/types.compile.pass.cpp
@@ -36,11 +36,11 @@
#include "test_macros.h"
// class tai_clock
-using rep = std::chrono::tai_clock::rep;
-using period = std::chrono::tai_clock::period;
-using duration = std::chrono::tai_clock::duration;
-using time_point = std::chrono::tai_clock::time_point;
-constexpr bool is_steady = std::chrono::tai_clock::is_steady;
+using rep = std::chrono::tai_clock::rep;
+using period = std::chrono::tai_clock::period;
+using duration = std::chrono::tai_clock::duration;
+using time_point = std::chrono::tai_clock::time_point;
+[[maybe_unused]] constexpr bool is_steady = std::chrono::tai_clock::is_steady;
// Tests the values. part of them are implementation defined.
LIBCPP_STATIC_ASSERT(std::same_as<rep, std::chrono::utc_clock::rep>);
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/time/time.syn/formatter.tai_time.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/time/time.syn/formatter.tai_time.pass.cpp
index 7ca088cc6e8f4..6a1d5bde44d35 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/time/time.syn/formatter.tai_time.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/time/time.syn/formatter.tai_time.pass.cpp
@@ -268,9 +268,6 @@ static void test_valid_values_day() {
lfmt,
cr::tai_seconds(1'613'259'090s)); // 23:31:30 TAI Friday, 13 February 2009
- // Use the global locale (fr_FR)
- check(SV("%d='01'\t%Od='01'\t%e=' 1'\t%Oe=' 1'\n"),
- lfmt,
#else // defined(_WIN32) || defined(__APPLE__) || defined(_AIX) || defined(__FreeBSD__)
check(loc,
SV("%d='01'\t%Od='一'\t%e=' 1'\t%Oe='一'\n"),
|
using period = std::chrono::gps_clock::period; | ||
using duration = std::chrono::gps_clock::duration; | ||
using time_point = std::chrono::gps_clock::time_point; | ||
[[maybe_unused]] constexpr bool is_steady = std::chrono::gps_clock::is_steady; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As the is_steady
is tested only once (ditto tai_clock::is_steady
) and doesn't seem necessary for twice, should we just remove it and write LIBCPP_STATIC_ASSERT(std::chrono::gps_clock::is_steady == false);
instead?
CC @mordante.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note that time.clock.utc/types.compile.pass.cpp
is also affected. (I missed gps and tai in my previous #131787.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree it's cleaner, but there are indeed more clocks affected. I've created #132546 to look into this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the fixes, LGTM!
using period = std::chrono::gps_clock::period; | ||
using duration = std::chrono::gps_clock::duration; | ||
using time_point = std::chrono::gps_clock::time_point; | ||
[[maybe_unused]] constexpr bool is_steady = std::chrono::gps_clock::is_steady; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree it's cleaner, but there are indeed more clocks affected. I've created #132546 to look into this.
formatter.tai_time.pass.cpp
.#if
to the#else
case, it's clear that this half-copied check should be removed.is_steady
as[[maybe_unused]]
.LIBCPP_STATIC_ASSERT
.