-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[RTSan][Darwin] Adjust OSSpinLock/_os_nospin_lock interceptor and tests #132867
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it be possible for the team to share some context about this line? I don't yet understand why we're aliasing a lock named
Spin
with a type that has the (seemingly contradictory)nospin
in its name. Any insight much appreciated here.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was done as part of the process for deprecating OSSpinLock years ago. What seems to have changed is the replacement happening in atomic_load seems to be due to the build min version of compiler rt library changing, which is why the behavior changed in a specific OS. I don't have info on why we deprecated the lock in this way.
Theoretically this should be a transparent interceptor, and you should only need to intercept OSSpinLock. But because atomic_load calls the alias and we expect to be able to intercept the atomic load behavior, we need to add this for that singular case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All good - that makes sense - thanks for the info. Would you mind adding this context as a comment into the code at the points where the
typedef
is made (here and inrtsan_interceptors_posix.cpp
)? I'd be happy to add the context comments myself, but I would want to get your approval on the wording before merging. Let me know - then I think this PR should be good to go in 👍